Hi,
There has been support for and no objections to the below proposal.
How do we go about implementing this?
Thanks,
Neal
At Tue, 13 Dec 2011 14:00:54 +0100,
Neal H. Walfield wrote:
Thanks to everyone for the feedback. I'm happy to learn that there is
already infrastructure for
Thanks to everyone for the feedback. I'm happy to learn that there is
already infrastructure for differentiating super-testers from normal
tesers. I think promoting orphaned packages is a different discussion
and I think this should be decided seperately.
My new proposal is:
- quarantine for
Em 13-12-2011 11:00, Neal H. Walfield escreveu:
Thanks to everyone for the feedback. I'm happy to learn that there is
already infrastructure for differentiating super-testers from normal
tesers. I think promoting orphaned packages is a different discussion
and I think this should be decided
Hi,
I'm afraid that extras is dying due to a lack of interest in testing
packages.
Last month, I uploaded some Woodchuck-related packages to
extras-devel. I asked on #maemo a few times for people to test my
packages. I asked on this mailing list. And, I asked on
talk.maemo.org. In the end,
Hi,
I propose that since most devs are asking others to vote for them
we remove the whole testing requirement and make promoting to extras-testing
something that's at the will of the developer.
--
Sent from my Nokia N950
Regards,
Mohammad Abu-Garbeyyeh
On 12/12/11 05:47 PM Neal H. Walfield
Hi Neal,
Thank you for taking the time to post this and to make a proposal. In my
opinion, the testing of packages is an essential function of the community
and we should come up with a solution that accounts for the lesser volume
of active participants in maemo these days.
FWIW, the council
On 12 December 2011 17:44, robert bauer nyba...@gmail.com wrote:
FWIW, the council (of which I am a member) suggested the idea of a limited
number of supertesters to Nemein awhile ago. The approval of a single
supertester would, in the absence of any disapproval, be sufficient for
promotion.
: maemo-developers-boun...@maemo.org
[mailto:maemo-developers-boun...@maemo.org] Per conto di Andrew Flegg
Inviato: lunedì 12 dicembre 2011 18:51
A: robert bauer
Cc: maemo-developers
Oggetto: Re: promotion to extras
On 12 December 2011 17:44, robert bauer nyba...@gmail.com wrote:
FWIW
On 12/12/2011 08:19 PM, emme...@gmail.com wrote:
You should also solve the problem of those applications that are ready to be promoted,
but the maintainer is no longer alive.
For example, after one month of the release, the promotion may become
automatic, or we should enable Supertester to do
20:01
A: emme...@gmail.com
Cc: 'Andrew Flegg'; 'maemo-developers'
Oggetto: Re: R: promotion to extras
On 12/12/2011 08:19 PM, emme...@gmail.com wrote:
You should also solve the problem of those applications that are ready to be
promoted, but the maintainer is no longer alive.
For example
emme...@gmail.com wrote:
So, in my opinion, if Supertester have given the green light to these
applications, I think it's fair that they be promoted in extras.
IMHO, the person doing the promoting should become the maintainer. If
not that person, then certainly one of the users of the
conto di Michael Cronenworth
Inviato: lunedì 12 dicembre 2011 20:25
A: maemo-developers@maemo.org
Oggetto: Re: R: R: promotion to extras
emme...@gmail.com wrote:
So, in my opinion, if Supertester have given the green light to these
applications, I think it's fair that they be promoted in extras
Hi,
few minutes ago I promoted (or better, tried to promote) Xournal to
extras-testing for approval to Extras.
After logging in and clicking on the Promote Package on the ARMEL
version, the browser hung.
Now, whenever I load the ARMEL package page:
Not sure if someone worked on this, but it is fine now.
Thanks!
anidel
On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 14:25, Aniello Del Sorbo ani...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
few minutes ago I promoted (or better, tried to promote) Xournal to
extras-testing for approval to Extras.
After logging in and clicking on
] On Behalf Of ext ds
Sent: 11 January, 2010 22:17
To: maemo-developers@maemo.org
Subject: Promotion to extras
Hello,
some weeks ago I promoted to extras. I could not find any changes.
I have Karma 11 in extras testing: Why is there not promotion link now?
Last time it was.
http
Message-
From: maemo-developers-boun...@maemo.org [mailto:maemo-developers-
boun...@maemo.org] On Behalf Of ext ds
Sent: 11 January, 2010 22:17
To: maemo-developers@maemo.org
Subject: Promotion to extras
Hello,
some weeks ago I promoted to extras. I could not find any changes
Hello,
some weeks ago I promoted to extras. I could not find any changes.
I have Karma 11 in extras testing: Why is there not promotion link now?
Last time it was.
http://maemo.org/packages/package_instance/view/fremantle_extras-testing_free_armel/vncviewer/0.6.4-fremantle2/
thanks a lot
Hi,
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 8:17 PM, ds d...@physik.de wrote:
Hello,
some weeks ago I promoted to extras. I could not find any changes.
I have Karma 11 in extras testing: Why is there not promotion link now?
The packages have to pass 10 days of quarantine[1] in testing before the
2010/1/11 Valerio Valerio vdv...@gmail.com:
Hi,
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 8:17 PM, ds d...@physik.de wrote:
Hello,
some weeks ago I promoted to extras. I could not find any changes.
I have Karma 11 in extras testing: Why is there not promotion link now?
The packages have to pass 10 days
Am Montag, den 11.01.2010, 23:02 +0200 schrieb Ed Bartosh:
2010/1/11 Valerio Valerio vdv...@gmail.com:
Hi,
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 8:17 PM, ds d...@physik.de wrote:
Hello,
some weeks ago I promoted to extras. I could not find any changes.
I have Karma 11 in extras testing: Why
20 matches
Mail list logo
