Re: umac.ko for 2.6.26

2008-08-22 Thread Kalle Valo
ext Gregoire Gentil [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: [ 274.247192] umac: module license 'Proprietary' taints kernel. [ 1328.262176] sm_drv_spi_probe [ 1328.262237] sm_drv_netdev_create [ 1328.262298] Registering WLAN platform device [ 1328.262847] Creating WLAN sysfs [ 1328.463775]

Re: umac.ko for 2.6.26

2008-08-18 Thread Gregoire Gentil
On Sun, 2008-08-17 at 17:03 -0400, Gregoire Gentil wrote: Faheem, Thanks for the tip. I tried it and it worked. I can insmod both umac and cx3110x in 2.6.26 and it looks fine in dmesg: cx3110x: chip variant STLC4550 cx3110x: firmware version 2.13.0.0.a.22.8. cx3110x: driver version

Re: umac.ko for 2.6.26

2008-08-17 Thread Kalle Valo
ext Gregoire Gentil [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hello, Hi, I'm experimenting with 2.6.26 on N810. I have successfully compiled cx3110x but I need umac.ko. How can I get this proprietary module compiled for 2.6.26? (Obviously, I can't insmod the 2.6.21 version). You simply can't. But we

Re: umac.ko for 2.6.26

2008-08-17 Thread Faheem Pervez
Hi, A bit of a dirty trick, but have you tried loading umac.ko in a hex editor and changing the string vermagic=2.6.21-omap1? I managed to recompile cx3110x against my preempt kernel by using the mamona patch for cx3110x and a dummy_umac.c file from 0.8.1 + binary_umac.o (renamed umac.ko from my

umac.ko for 2.6.26

2008-08-16 Thread Gregoire Gentil
Hello, I'm experimenting with 2.6.26 on N810. I have successfully compiled cx3110x but I need umac.ko. How can I get this proprietary module compiled for 2.6.26? (Obviously, I can't insmod the 2.6.21 version). Thanks in advance, Gregoire ___ maemo

Re: umac.ko

2007-12-12 Thread Kalle Valo
ext [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I also very much would like this to work with packet injection, Me too. and be able to modify the source completely for other reasons. I also would like you to be able to modify the source code, no doubt about that. I'm a strong supporter of

Re: umac.ko

2007-12-11 Thread davidruff
En/na Kalle Valo ha escrit: ext Luca Olivetti luca[at]ventoso.org writes: En/na Kalle Valo ha escrit: ext Alex Iliadis alex[at]immunityinc.com writes: [packet injection] Is there a way that we can modify the source of the umac.ko module supplied with the N810 or N800? The answer

Re: umac.ko

2007-12-11 Thread Brian Waite
of the umac.ko module supplied with the N810 or N800? The answer is plain and simple no. The umac.ko module is proprietary and the source code is not available. Sorry. But somebody has access to that sources, so he or she could add this often requested feature, right? I find

Re: umac.ko

2007-12-07 Thread Kalle Valo
ext Luca Olivetti [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I find that very unlikely. If you can come with a good business _and_ use case, I might reconsider taking this to higher-ups. But the reasons would have to be really good. Mmh, so I guess that ranking better on

Re: umac.ko

2007-12-06 Thread Kalle Valo
ext Luca Olivetti [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: En/na Kalle Valo ha escrit: ext Alex Iliadis [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: [packet injection] Is there a way that we can modify the source of the umac.ko module supplied with the N810 or N800? The answer is plain and simple no. The umac.ko module

Re: umac.ko

2007-12-06 Thread Luca Olivetti
En/na Kalle Valo ha escrit: ext Luca Olivetti [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: En/na Kalle Valo ha escrit: ext Alex Iliadis [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: [packet injection] Is there a way that we can modify the source of the umac.ko module supplied with the N810 or N800? The answer is plain

Re: umac.ko

2007-12-05 Thread Luca Olivetti
En/na Kalle Valo ha escrit: ext Alex Iliadis [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Is there a way that we can modify the source of the umac.ko module supplied with the N810 or N800? The answer is plain and simple no. The umac.ko module is proprietary and the source code is not available. Sorry