Julian Toler wrote:
> I am not too worried about video with Skype (although of course it
> would be nice!) - what I really miss compared with Desktop Skype is
> the ability to send SMS text messages. This is a brilliant feature of
> Skype and saves me a load of cash (I only have a PAYG mobile ph
"ext Joshua Layne" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The biggest problem for me is that if I am connected to my phone (say, on
> my commute...) it keeps the phone connection even if the Home wireless
> network is available. Same is true of the work network, although the work
> network never autoconne
Peter Flynn wrote:
> A normal mailing-list reader should NOT have to make a mental decision
> each time they write a reply: the Reply-To header ought to have been set
> appropriately by the mailing list.
>
> But it won't change. It's up to the owners of mailing lists to set the
> appropriate d
Greetings,
>> Why does Thunderbird always send to individuals rather than the
>> list for this mailing list? Weird!
>
> It's an article of faith among strict mail gurus that replies should
> always go back to the sender, and any variance from this is regarded
> as meddling (see the rant at
> http
Ok, I just checked in kmail and I can simply hit the L key all by itself to
reply to the mailing list... :-)
I think I like the folders because sometimes I keep certain messages around
and I don't have to move them if I want to keep them.
tim
On 01/17/2008 09:01, Michael R. Head wrote:
> On T
Matt Emson wrote:
> Why does Thunderbird always send to individuals rather than the list for
> this mailing list? Weird!
It's due to a grotesque misunderstanding.
It's an article of faith among strict mail gurus that replies should
always go back to the sender, and any variance from this is reg
On Thu, Jan 17, 2008 at 11:45:01AM +0100, Johan Helsingius wrote:
> Matt,
>
> > Why does Thunderbird always send to individuals rather than the list for
> > this mailing list? Weird!
>
> Not at all weird, and not in any way Thunderbird-specific. The mailing
> list keeps the sender address in the
On Thu, 2008-01-17 at 13:50 -0500, Russ Wenner wrote:
> Is anyone else having trouble dragging icons/windows on their N800
> OS2008 desktop?
Icons? Man I would love the ability to iconify an app on the desktop.
Surely you didn't mean icons?
___
maem
I found that if I click "Home" > "Select applets..." > then un-check
the offending applet > OK. Then repeat the process by re-selecting
the applets I want. Only then, for a short time, can I drag windows
around. In time they will no longer drag willingly, if a fuss with
them they will drag, but I
On Thu, 17 Jan 2008 10:56:07 -0800, "Wayne Fiori" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Have you tried using ``Lock touch screen and keys'' ??
>
> Press the power button briefly and select it from the Device Mode menu.
> --
It would be really nice to be able to lock the applets on the page. I've
had th
I posted about this exact same issue as it's how the iPhone works and
one of the very cool features of that device.
http://www.maemoapps.com/2007/10/23/maemo-feature-request-connection-switching/
In the comments is a link to the roadmap wishlist -
http://maemo.org/community/wiki/roadmapwishlist/
Have you tried using ``Lock touch screen and keys'' ??
Press the power button briefly and select it from the Device Mode menu.
--
=Wayne
On Jan 17, 2008 10:50 AM, Russ Wenner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> PS...Of course, If I stick the N800 in my coat pocket and take it back
> out all the i
Is anyone else having trouble dragging icons/windows on their N800
OS2008 desktop? I never had trouble with this under OS2007; it seems
suddenly that everything is stuck in one place. Is there a setting
that controls this?
Thanks in advance...
PS...Of course, If I stick the N800 in my coat pock
I am wondering if this is even possible, but is there a way to set up
priorities (as in wpa_supplicant.conf, for example) for the different
networking connections (including tethered BT)? I am getting really sick
of having to manually reconnect each connection.
My personal setup:
Home network: vis
giskard wrote:
> /dev/mmcblk0p1 on /media/mmc2 type vfat
> (rw,nosuid,nodev,uid=2,fmask=0133,dmask=,codepage=cp437,iocharset=iso8859-1,shortname=mixed,utf8)
>
> Nokia-N810-50-2:/media/mmc2/src/powertop-1.9# ./powertop
> -sh: ./powertop: Permission denied
Looks like your fmask excludes the
On Thu, Jan 17, 2008 at 12:45:13PM +0100, Tilman Vogel wrote:
> Johan Helsingius schrieb:
> > Use "Reply All" if you want to send to the
> > whole list too.
>
> I'd suggest to remove the individual recipients then (like I did now),
> because many people don't like to get individual duplicates on m
hello,
don't know if this is the right place where ask this kind of questions.
i've built by myself powertop on my n810, but when i try to exec it i
get this error.
Nokia-N810-50-2:/media/mmc2/src/powertop-1.9# ./powertop
-sh: ./powertop: Permission denied
people told me that the mmc partition
On Thu, 2008-01-17 at 06:24 -0800, Tim Ashman wrote:
> I use kmail, it has a feature where you setup a folder, mark it as a mailing
> list, set it reply to address once, then set a rule to move the messages from
> the inbox to the correct folder then when I use the reply it does the right
> thi
On Thu, Jan 17, 2008 at 09:41:20AM +0100, Frantisek Dufka wrote:
> Marius Gedminas wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 15, 2008 at 07:49:06PM +0100, Frantisek Dufka wrote:
> >> You don't need scratchbox, any linux distribution will do. Follow this
> >> guide to unpack and recreate initfs by Rodrigo Vivi
> >>
Kalle Valo wrote:
> That's strange. Did you reboot the device in the mean time? Also, do
> you remember what channel your AP is configured to?
I'm not sure when the connection started working again, but I did reboot the
N800 and the WRT when I was experiencing the problem. The WRT has Linksys
fi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Frantisek Dufka schrieb:
> Tilman Vogel wrote:
>> I'd suggest to remove the individual recipients then (like I did now),
>> because many people don't like to get individual duplicates on mailing
>> list posts.
>
> Is there some reasoning or RFC regard
Oh, I see. Yes then that would be cool.
tim
On 01/17/2008 01:21, Tilman Vogel wrote:
> Tim Ashman schrieb:
> > Hmm, my n810 does flash video.. What am I missing here.
>
> I think, this thread was about using the webcam which can also be done
> in flash. Playing back video is a different story.
I use kmail, it has a feature where you setup a folder, mark it as a mailing
list, set it reply to address once, then set a rule to move the messages from
the inbox to the correct folder then when I use the reply it does the right
thing.
tim
On 01/17/2008 06:15, Kevin T. Neely wrote:
> On Thu,
On Thu, Jan 17, 2008 at 10:09:04AM +, Matt Emson wrote:
> Why does Thunderbird always send to individuals rather than the list for
> this mailing list? Weird!
It is the way this list is setup. Thunderbird (and mutt in my case) is doing
"the right thing" and replying as the headers specify.
Tilman Vogel wrote:
> I'd suggest to remove the individual recipients then (like I did now),
> because many people don't like to get individual duplicates on mailing
> list posts.
Is there some reasoning or RFC regarding this? I'm quite ambivalent on
this and mostly leave people in. I only remove
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Johan Helsingius schrieb:
> Use "Reply All" if you want to send to the
> whole list too.
I'd suggest to remove the individual recipients then (like I did now),
because many people don't like to get individual duplicates on mailing
list posts.
Some ma
Matt,
> Why does Thunderbird always send to individuals rather than the list for
> this mailing list? Weird!
Not at all weird, and not in any way Thunderbird-specific. The mailing
list keeps the sender address in the "From:" field, so responses go
to the original sender. Use "Reply All" if you wa
Why does Thunderbird always send to individuals rather than the list for
this mailing list? Weird!
Resent the below:
Tim Ashman wrote:
> Hmm, my n810 does flash video.. What am I missing here.
Sorry, my mistake, I though the context was clear enough ;-)
Flash _webcam_ support. Allowing flash t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tim Ashman schrieb:
> Hmm, my n810 does flash video.. What am I missing here.
I think, this thread was about using the webcam which can also be done
in flash. Playing back video is a different story.
Tilman
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: Gnu
Marius Gedminas wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 15, 2008 at 07:49:06PM +0100, Frantisek Dufka wrote:
>> You don't need scratchbox, any linux distribution will do. Follow this
>> guide to unpack and recreate initfs by Rodrigo Vivi
>> http://labs.vivi.eng.br/blog/?p=29
>
> And here's where it breaks down:
>
30 matches
Mail list logo
