On Thu, Jan 10, 2008 at 03:32:51AM +0100, sebastian maemo wrote:
> Dear Marius:
>
> 2007/12/29, Marius Gedminas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > So, what command-line tools do you miss? I've got an idle scratchbox
> > here.
>
> Could you please make a deb package for aircrack-ng for 770?
If it's a simp
Dear Marius:
2007/12/29, Marius Gedminas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>
> So, what command-line tools do you miss? I've got an idle scratchbox
> here.
Could you please make a deb package for aircrack-ng for 770?
Thank you very much in advance.
Salut,
Sebas.
_
On Fri, Jan 04, 2008 at 02:33:41AM -0800, James Sparenberg wrote:
> On Wednesday 02 January 2008 06:07:47 Marius Gedminas wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 01, 2008 at 11:42:01PM -0800, James Sparenberg wrote:
> > > Hendrik,
> > >
> > > Actually ping requires root on all systems. Since in order to
> > > d
On Wednesday 02 January 2008 06:07:47 Marius Gedminas wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 01, 2008 at 11:42:01PM -0800, James Sparenberg wrote:
> > Hendrik,
> >
> > Actually ping requires root on all systems. Since in order to
> > do icmp you need to put the nic into a different mode than it
> > runs in norma
On Tue, Jan 01, 2008 at 11:42:01PM -0800, James Sparenberg wrote:
> Hendrik,
>
> Actually ping requires root on all systems. Since in order to do
> icmp you need to put the nic into a different mode than it runs in
> normally. The way it is normally done on every other linux distro is
>
Hi,
ext Marius Gedminas wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 27, 2007 at 04:43:51PM +0100, Zoran Kolic wrote:
>>> If you're a new user, I'd forget O7 and go directly to 08. There's
>>> enough 08 stuff for a new user that you'll spend a week or more
>>> exploring all that's available, and by then, even more s
On Sunday 30 December 2007 08:10:39 am Peter Flynn wrote:
> Tuomas Kulve wrote:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >> That's bizarre. What security implications are there in ping
> >> that would mean it has to be run only by root? Forcing people
> >> to use root when not necessary is itself a securit
On Sunday 30 December 2007 06:50:05 am [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 29, 2007 at 07:23:15PM -0500, James Knott wrote:
> > Peter Flynn wrote:
> > > Marius Gedminas wrote:
> > >> On Thu, Dec 27, 2007 at 04:43:51PM +0100, Zoran Kolic wrote:
> > If you're a new user, I'd forget O7 and
On Sun, Dec 30, 2007 at 08:46:45PM +, Neil MacLeod wrote:
> Marius Gedminas wrote:
> >
> > I've built some today (less, links, mc, wget; made vim actually
> > installable). I don't have upload privileges to maemo extras yet, so
> > you can find them only at http://mg.pov.lt/770/
>
> Just to
According to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Sat, Dec 29, 2007 at 07:23:15PM -0500, James Knott wrote:
> >
> > Ping is there, but you have to be root to use it.
>
> That's bizarre. What security implications are there in ping that would
> mean it has to be run only by root? Forcing people to use ro
Marius Gedminas wrote:
>
> I've built some today (less, links, mc, wget; made vim actually
> installable). I don't have upload privileges to maemo extras yet, so
> you can find them only at http://mg.pov.lt/770/
>
Just to say that wget, less and traceroute are already available in
repos[i]tory
On Sun, Dec 30, 2007 at 12:10:27AM +, Peter Flynn wrote:
> Marius Gedminas wrote:
> > So, what command-line tools do you miss? I've got an idle scratchbox
> > here.
>
> ping and traceroute would be useful.
Here you are:
http://mg.pov.lt/770/ping.install
http://mg.pov.lt/770/traceroute.i
On Sun, Dec 30, 2007 at 07:54:44PM +0200, Tuomas Kulve wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > There's a big difference between setuid root ahd having to be root.
>
> Ping is just a link to busybox and setting busybox as setuid wouldn't
> probably be a good solution either.
How about a /usr/bin/
Tuomas Kulve wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>
>> There's a big difference between setuid root ahd having to be root.
>>
>
> Ping is just a link to busybox and setting busybox as setuid wouldn't
> probably be a good solution either.
>
>
So are vi and pwd, but they both work, without
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> There's a big difference between setuid root ahd having to be root.
Ping is just a link to busybox and setting busybox as setuid wouldn't
probably be a good solution either.
--
Tuomas
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On Sun, Dec 30, 2007 at 05:03:42PM +0200, Tuomas Kulve wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > That's bizarre. What security implications are there in ping that would
> > mean it has to be run only by root? Forcing people to use root when not
> > necessary is itself a security problem.
>
> Pi
Peter Flynn wrote:
> Tuomas Kulve wrote:
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>
>>> That's bizarre. What security implications are there in ping that would
>>> mean it has to be run only by root? Forcing people to use root when not
>>> necessary is itself a security problem.
>> Ping seems to be setuid ro
Tuomas Kulve wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>> That's bizarre. What security implications are there in ping that would
>> mean it has to be run only by root? Forcing people to use root when not
>> necessary is itself a security problem.
>
> Ping seems to be setuid root on my debian. So i
> I've built some today (less, links, mc, wget; made vim actually
> installable). I don't have upload privileges to maemo extras yet, so
> you can find them only at http://mg.pov.lt/770/
>
...
>
> Marius Gedminas
Hi Marius,
thanks for providing "mc". That makes remote working on the device much
> > That's bizarre. What security implications are there in ping that would
> > mean it has to be run only by root? Forcing people to use root when not
> > necessary is itself a security problem.
>
> I have no idea, but I've come across a few things in the N800 that cause
> me to question some
Tuomas Kulve wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>
>> That's bizarre. What security implications are there in ping that would
>> mean it has to be run only by root? Forcing people to use root when not
>> necessary is itself a security problem.
>>
>
> Ping seems to be setuid root on my d
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> Ping is there, but you have to be root to use it.
>>
>
> That's bizarre. What security implications are there in ping that would
> mean it has to be run only by root? Forcing people to use root when not
> necessary is itself a security problem.
>
>
I have no
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> That's bizarre. What security implications are there in ping that would
> mean it has to be run only by root? Forcing people to use root when not
> necessary is itself a security problem.
Ping seems to be setuid root on my debian. So it's run as root here too.
--
On Sat, Dec 29, 2007 at 07:23:15PM -0500, James Knott wrote:
> Peter Flynn wrote:
> > Marius Gedminas wrote:
> >
> >> On Thu, Dec 27, 2007 at 04:43:51PM +0100, Zoran Kolic wrote:
> >>
> If you're a new user, I'd forget O7 and go directly to 08. There's
> enough 08 stuff for a
> > A lot of useful command line tools have gone to the mist.
> > Hope the same will not get perl, python, ruby...
>
> So, what command-line tools do you miss? I've got an idle scratchbox
> here.
None. I still have my 770 and it works fine. I made a mistake
and said my word or two about trend in
Peter Flynn wrote:
> Marius Gedminas wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Dec 27, 2007 at 04:43:51PM +0100, Zoran Kolic wrote:
>>
If you're a new user, I'd forget O7 and go directly to 08. There's
enough 08 stuff for a new user that you'll spend a week or more
exploring all that's availa
Marius Gedminas wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 27, 2007 at 04:43:51PM +0100, Zoran Kolic wrote:
>>> If you're a new user, I'd forget O7 and go directly to 08. There's
>>> enough 08 stuff for a new user that you'll spend a week or more
>>> exploring all that's available, and by then, even more stuff will
On Thu, Dec 27, 2007 at 04:43:51PM +0100, Zoran Kolic wrote:
> > If you're a new user, I'd forget O7 and go directly to 08. There's
> > enough 08 stuff for a new user that you'll spend a week or more
> > exploring all that's available, and by then, even more stuff will be
> > available.
>
> A
28 matches
Mail list logo
