On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 8:05 AM, Matt Emson mem...@interalpha.co.uk wrote:
Mark wrote:
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 4:20 PM, kenneth marken kemar...@broadpark.no
wrote:
i wish i could point you to the law text, but sadly its only in
norwegian...
To quote Dickens, the law is an ass.
hend...@topoi.pooq.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 09, 2009 at 01:15:58PM -0700, lakestevensdental wrote:
* W7 requires 4 partitions, leaving only 1 partition for a dual boot
to Ubuntu or other OS. Ubuntu currently recommends an separate
partition for swap memory, but W7 isn't
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 02:41:25PM -0700, lakestevensdental wrote:
hend...@topoi.pooq.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 09, 2009 at 01:15:58PM -0700, lakestevensdental wrote:
* W7 requires 4 partitions, leaving only 1 partition for a dual boot
to Ubuntu or other OS. Ubuntu currently
kenneth marken wrote:
lakestevensdental wrote:
On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 5:28 PM, kenneth marken
kemar...@broadpark.no wrote:
iirc, when first launched the linux variant was the lowest spec-ed
one, and
the windows variants both came with rebates that made them as
cheap or
cheaper then the
lakestevensdental wrote:
kenneth marken wrote:
lakestevensdental wrote:
On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 5:28 PM, kenneth marken
kemar...@broadpark.no wrote:
iirc, when first launched the linux variant was the lowest spec-ed
one, and
the windows variants both came with rebates that made them as
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 12:57 PM, kenneth marken kemar...@broadpark.no wrote:
more likely that said computer would be returned for a refund. that is,
if it was not bought with XP in the first place...
Yeah, good luck with that. None of the stores I know would take back
that kind of a product for
John Holmblad wrote:
Fred C,
re your comment
...with more core memory.
Where can I get some of that?
The long boot time of windows XP, and, for that matter Vista, explains
why Microsoft is racing to get Windows 7 out the door to fix that
Achilles heel vs Linux.
Mark wrote:
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 12:57 PM, kenneth marken kemar...@broadpark.no wrote:
more likely that said computer would be returned for a refund. that is,
if it was not bought with XP in the first place...
Yeah, good luck with that. None of the stores I know would take back
that kind
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 3:04 PM, kenneth marken kemar...@broadpark.no wrote:
Mark wrote:
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 12:57 PM, kenneth marken kemar...@broadpark.no
wrote:
more likely that said computer would be returned for a refund. that is,
if it was not bought with XP in the first place...
Mark wrote:
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 3:04 PM, kenneth marken kemar...@broadpark.no wrote:
Mark wrote:
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 12:57 PM, kenneth marken kemar...@broadpark.no
wrote:
more likely that said computer would be returned for a refund. that is,
if it was not bought with XP in the first
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 4:20 PM, kenneth marken kemar...@broadpark.no wrote:
i wish i could point you to the law text, but sadly its only in norwegian...
To quote Dickens, the law is an ass. I consider ethics to be
stronger than law. In other words, there are plenty of things that are
legal but
Fred C,
re your comment
...with more core memory.
Where can I get some of that?
The long boot time of windows XP, and, for that matter Vista, explains
why Microsoft is racing to get Windows 7 out the door to fix that
Achilles heel vs Linux. Microsoft are only too
John Holmblad wrote:
Fred C,
re your comment
...with more core memory.
Where can I get some of that?
I've got a 16K x 1 core memory plane from a Collins 8500B computer
here. However, core memory tends to be very expensive, slow, power
hungry bulky. Not sure
lakestevensdental wrote:
On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 5:28 PM, kenneth marken kemar...@broadpark.no
wrote:
iirc, when first launched the linux variant was the lowest spec-ed
one, and
the windows variants both came with rebates that made them as cheap or
cheaper then the start out config of the
On Fri, Mar 06, 2009 at 07:53:28PM -0500, hend...@topoi.pooq.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 06, 2009 at 06:42:05PM -0300, Fernando Cassia wrote:
On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 5:28 PM, kenneth marken kemar...@broadpark.no
wrote:
iirc, when first launched the linux variant was the lowest spec-ed one,
kenneth marken wrote:
Ognen Duzlevski wrote:
the only company that has given linux a fair chance in all this is asus,
and they have the worst linux distro in use...
Luckily, Ubuntu runs on Eee.
while true, people will give xandros a spin, find it a nightmare and
then
On Thu, 2009-03-05 at 14:21 -0800, lakestevensdental wrote:
After using a variety of small internet communication/computing devices,
(n800, n810, netbook-eee PC on Xandros, Ubuntu and now XP, plus and Ipod
Touch), I've come to some conclusions that might be worth sharing.
1. None of
On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 8:21 PM, lakestevensdental
lakestevensden...@verizon.net wrote:
After using a variety of small internet communication/computing devices,
(n800, n810, netbook-eee PC on Xandros, Ubuntu and now XP, plus and Ipod
Touch), I've come to some conclusions that might be worth
Fernando Cassia wrote:
On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 8:21 PM, lakestevensdental
lakestevensden...@verizon.net wrote:
After using a variety of small internet communication/computing devices,
(n800, n810, netbook-eee PC on Xandros, Ubuntu and now XP, plus and Ipod
Touch), I've come to some conclusions
the only company that has given linux a fair chance in all this is asus,
and they have the worst linux distro in use...
Luckily, Ubuntu runs on Eee.
Ognen
___
maemo-users mailing list
maemo-users@maemo.org
Ognen Duzlevski wrote:
the only company that has given linux a fair chance in all this is asus,
and they have the worst linux distro in use...
Luckily, Ubuntu runs on Eee.
while true, people will give xandros a spin, find it a nightmare and
then return the whole eeepc for the windows
funny then how more and more of the companies are dropping linux...
I start to wonder if all these Asus/Acer/etc don't ship a Linux
version first to obtain better OEM deal with microsoft later :-)
___
maemo-users mailing list
maemo-users@maemo.org
Cedric Cellier wrote:
funny then how more and more of the companies are dropping linux...
I start to wonder if all these Asus/Acer/etc don't ship a Linux
version first to obtain better OEM deal with microsoft later :-)
would not be the first time, it also made microsoft keep xp alive longer
On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 6:19 PM, kenneth marken kemar...@broadpark.no wrote:
Cedric Cellier wrote:
funny then how more and more of the companies are dropping linux...
I start to wonder if all these Asus/Acer/etc don't ship a Linux
version first to obtain better OEM deal with microsoft later
On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 5:28 PM, kenneth marken kemar...@broadpark.no wrote:
iirc, when first launched the linux variant was the lowest spec-ed one, and
the windows variants both came with rebates that made them as cheap or
cheaper then the start out config of the linux one.
March 1, 2009
Fernando Cassia wrote:
On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 5:28 PM, kenneth marken kemar...@broadpark.no wrote:
iirc, when first launched the linux variant was the lowest spec-ed one, and
the windows variants both came with rebates that made them as cheap or
cheaper then the start out config of the linux
On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 5:28 PM, kenneth marken kemar...@broadpark.no
wrote:
iirc, when first launched the linux variant was the lowest spec-ed
one, and
the windows variants both came with rebates that made them as cheap or
cheaper then the start out config of the linux one.
FYI, you can
On Fri, Mar 06, 2009 at 06:42:05PM -0300, Fernando Cassia wrote:
On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 5:28 PM, kenneth marken kemar...@broadpark.no wrote:
iirc, when first launched the linux variant was the lowest spec-ed one, and
the windows variants both came with rebates that made them as cheap or
After using a variety of small internet communication/computing devices,
(n800, n810, netbook-eee PC on Xandros, Ubuntu and now XP, plus and Ipod
Touch), I've come to some conclusions that might be worth sharing.
1. None of these devices is a truly one size fits all solution for small
Samer Azmy wrote:
Interesting point of view but I wanted to add something regarding the
Nokia N770,N8xx
that they enjoy the Openness which means even if there is an Itouch
application tht you cant find on the Nokia , you simply can program it
I see Nokia tablet is more open ended
On Thu, Mar 05, 2009 at 03:56:58PM -0800, lakestevensdental wrote:
Having used an ASUS eee PC for several months, I'm growing to like the
netbook format more and more, especially after installing XP so it
interfaces with all my business and other stuff.
Interesting. I'm planning to get
I do agree with what you said, and I have eee for sometime now
the only problem I have is this tiny winy screen, which has it's own reason.
I wonder if any of you tried any portable that has e-ink display
Samer
On Fri, Mar 6, 2009 at 1:05 AM, hend...@topoi.pooq.com wrote:
On Thu, Mar 05, 2009
32 matches
Mail list logo
