Re: OT: Mailinglist Reply To All (was Re: [Fwd: Re: Skype video?])

2008-01-18 Thread hendrik
On Thu, Jan 17, 2008 at 10:18:36PM -0500, Mike Lococo wrote: The basic points have been summarized for newcomers, which is as far as the discussion need proceed. If you have further comments, please take the discussion off-list. Exactly. To take a discussion offlist, you need an unmunged

Re: OT: Mailinglist Reply To All (was Re: [Fwd: Re: Skype video?])

2008-01-17 Thread Frantisek Dufka
Tilman Vogel wrote: I'd suggest to remove the individual recipients then (like I did now), because many people don't like to get individual duplicates on mailing list posts. Is there some reasoning or RFC regarding this? I'm quite ambivalent on this and mostly leave people in. I only remove

OT: Mailinglist Reply To All (was Re: [Fwd: Re: Skype video?])

2008-01-17 Thread Tilman Vogel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Johan Helsingius schrieb: Use Reply All if you want to send to the whole list too. I'd suggest to remove the individual recipients then (like I did now), because many people don't like to get individual duplicates on mailing list posts. Some mail

Re: OT: Mailinglist Reply To All (was Re: [Fwd: Re: Skype video?])

2008-01-17 Thread Tilman Vogel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Frantisek Dufka schrieb: Tilman Vogel wrote: I'd suggest to remove the individual recipients then (like I did now), because many people don't like to get individual duplicates on mailing list posts. Is there some reasoning or RFC regarding

Re: OT: Mailinglist Reply To All (was Re: [Fwd: Re: Skype video?])

2008-01-17 Thread Kevin T. Neely
On Thu, Jan 17, 2008 at 12:45:13PM +0100, Tilman Vogel wrote: Johan Helsingius schrieb: Use Reply All if you want to send to the whole list too. I'd suggest to remove the individual recipients then (like I did now), because many people don't like to get individual duplicates on mailing

OT: Mailinglist Reply To All (was Re: [Fwd: Re: Skype video?])

2008-01-17 Thread Peter Flynn
Matt Emson wrote: Why does Thunderbird always send to individuals rather than the list for this mailing list? Weird! It's due to a grotesque misunderstanding. It's an article of faith among strict mail gurus that replies should always go back to the sender, and any variance from this is

Re: OT: Mailinglist Reply To All (was Re: [Fwd: Re: Skype video?])

2008-01-17 Thread Mike Lococo
Greetings, Why does Thunderbird always send to individuals rather than the list for this mailing list? Weird! It's an article of faith among strict mail gurus that replies should always go back to the sender, and any variance from this is regarded as meddling (see the rant at

Re: OT: Mailinglist Reply To All (was Re: [Fwd: Re: Skype video?])

2008-01-17 Thread R. G. Newbury
Peter Flynn wrote: A normal mailing-list reader should NOT have to make a mental decision each time they write a reply: the Reply-To header ought to have been set appropriately by the mailing list. But it won't change. It's up to the owners of mailing lists to set the appropriate