> I don't think a GUID would be very useful. When I installed Mandriva, I
> installed it on one machine, setup the configurations the way I wanted
> them, and then cloned the hd for 4 other systems. The GUID would be
> identical on all four systems.
Though I am against this idea, there is more
Marc Paré wrote:
>
> I guess both of your suggestions would work André and Margot.
>
> So, this sounds like it could be something that could be worked out. I
> would prefer, as a user, Margot's process. Of course the user would
> have to be able to see the usage and re-claimed space due to his use
Luca Berra wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 09, 2010 at 11:10:36AM +0200, Renaud MICHEL wrote:
>>
>> But here you are only talking about system-wide configuration files,
>> which are known of rpm as they are part of the package and marked as
>> config files.
>> But what about user specific configuration files?
On Sat, Oct 09, 2010 at 06:48:40PM +, Dick Gevers wrote:
On Sat, 9 Oct 2010 18:42:25 +0200, Luca Berra wrote about Re: [Mageia-dev]
Proposal: Updating released versions (long post):
--repackage has been dropped from urpmi since it has been dropped from
rpm 4.6
Will you post it in Mdv Bugz
On 9 October 2010 20:48, Dick Gevers wrote:
> On Sat, 9 Oct 2010 18:42:25 +0200, Luca Berra wrote about Re: [Mageia-dev]
> Proposal: Updating released versions (long post):
>
--repackage has been dropped from urpmi since it has been dropped from
rpm 4.6
>>>
>>>Will you post it in Mdv Bugzi
On Sat, 9 Oct 2010 18:42:25 +0200, Luca Berra wrote about Re: [Mageia-dev]
Proposal: Updating released versions (long post):
>>>--repackage has been dropped from urpmi since it has been dropped from
>>>rpm 4.6
>>
>>Will you post it in Mdv Bugzilla?
>
>what for?
To request / remember that urpmi s
On Sat, Oct 09, 2010 at 01:16:09PM +, Dick Gevers wrote:
On Sat, 9 Oct 2010 12:28:44 +0200, Luca Berra wrote about Re: [Mageia-dev]
Proposal: Updating released versions (long post):
--repackage has been dropped from urpmi since it has been dropped from
rpm 4.6
Will you post it in Mdv Bugz
andré skrev 9.10.2010 17:41:
BTW, a feature to blacklist the installation of a particular version of
a package would be very useful. I.e. an option "never install this
package" or "never select automatically this package".
This would prevent a package found to be problematic on a particular
syst
Frank Griffin a écrit :
Part of the recent thread about what the desirable release cycle should
be devolved into a discussion of how backports works and whether or not
it's suitable. I'd like to examine this issue.
The current urpmi repository architecture serves purposes that were
meaningful t
Luca Berra a écrit :
On Sat, Oct 09, 2010 at 11:10:36AM +0200, Renaud MICHEL wrote:
On samedi 09 octobre 2010 at 05:45, andré wrote :
Note that configuration files that have been changed from the
installation default are often already saved. (Generally ".old" is
appended to the configuration
On Sat, 9 Oct 2010 12:28:44 +0200, Luca Berra wrote about Re: [Mageia-dev]
Proposal: Updating released versions (long post):
>--repackage has been dropped from urpmi since it has been dropped from
>rpm 4.6
Will you post it in Mdv Bugzilla?
TIA
=Dick Gevers=
On Sat, Oct 09, 2010 at 11:10:36AM +0200, Renaud MICHEL wrote:
On samedi 09 octobre 2010 at 05:45, andré wrote :
Note that configuration files that have been changed from the
installation default are often already saved. (Generally ".old" is
appended to the configuration file name, sometimes "
On Sat, Oct 09, 2010 at 08:05:08AM +0100, Margot wrote:
There are already various options which can be run with urpmi, such
as --noclean and --repackage (see man urpmi) and perhaps these
could be incorporated into the GUI - with full simple explanations
for the user on exactly what will happen if
On samedi 09 octobre 2010 at 05:45, andré wrote :
> Note that configuration files that have been changed from the
> installation default are often already saved. (Generally ".old" is
> appended to the configuration file name, sometimes ".new" to the new
> configuration file.)
But here you are
Marc Paré schrieb am 2010-10-09
> > Before we start having polls and surveys, it would be useful to
> > hear from our devs. I'm hoping that they have already been
> > communicating with one another in the background (IRC? private
> > emails?) and working out what can actually be done.
I can rememb
Le 2010-10-09 03:57, Margot a écrit :
There has been a lengthy debate about users' wishes for the Mageia
release cycle, but one important voice has been missing from this
debate: the collective voice of the devs who will be responsible
for producing the releases.
Before we start having polls and
There has been a lengthy debate about users' wishes for the Mageia
release cycle, but one important voice has been missing from this
debate: the collective voice of the devs who will be responsible
for producing the releases.
Before we start having polls and surveys, it would be useful to
hear fro
Le 2010-10-09 03:05, Margot a écrit :
On Sat, 09 Oct 2010 02:15:18 -0400
andré wrote:
Marc Paré a écrit :
Le 2010-10-08 23:45, andré a écrit :
Frank Griffin a écrit :
Marc Paré wrote:
Thanks. So this thread is to see if there were a possibility
to programme a more efficient roll-back opti
On Sat, 09 Oct 2010 02:15:18 -0400
andré wrote:
> Marc Paré a écrit :
> >
> > Le 2010-10-08 23:45, andré a écrit :
> >> Frank Griffin a écrit :
> >>> Marc Paré wrote:
> Thanks. So this thread is to see if there were a possibility
> to programme a more efficient roll-back option so that
19 matches
Mail list logo
