Marc Paré a écrit :
Le 2010-10-08 23:45, andré a écrit :
Frank Griffin a écrit :
Marc Paré wrote:
Thanks. So this thread is to see if there were a possibility to
programme a more efficient roll-back option so that it would be more
aware of the previous dependencies needs for the previous
On Sat, 09 Oct 2010 02:15:18 -0400
andré and...@laposte.net wrote:
Marc Paré a écrit :
Le 2010-10-08 23:45, andré a écrit :
Frank Griffin a écrit :
Marc Paré wrote:
Thanks. So this thread is to see if there were a possibility
to programme a more efficient roll-back option so that it
Le 2010-10-09 03:57, Margot a écrit :
There has been a lengthy debate about users' wishes for the Mageia
release cycle, but one important voice has been missing from this
debate: the collective voice of the devs who will be responsible
for producing the releases.
Before we start having polls
Marc Paré m...@marcpare.com schrieb am 2010-10-09
Before we start having polls and surveys, it would be useful to
hear from our devs. I'm hoping that they have already been
communicating with one another in the background (IRC? private
emails?) and working out what can actually be done.
I
On samedi 09 octobre 2010 at 05:45, andré wrote :
Note that configuration files that have been changed from the
installation default are often already saved. (Generally .old is
appended to the configuration file name, sometimes .new to the new
configuration file.)
But here you are only
On Sat, Oct 09, 2010 at 08:05:08AM +0100, Margot wrote:
There are already various options which can be run with urpmi, such
as --noclean and --repackage (see man urpmi) and perhaps these
could be incorporated into the GUI - with full simple explanations
for the user on exactly what will happen
On Sat, Oct 09, 2010 at 11:10:36AM +0200, Renaud MICHEL wrote:
On samedi 09 octobre 2010 at 05:45, andré wrote :
Note that configuration files that have been changed from the
installation default are often already saved. (Generally .old is
appended to the configuration file name, sometimes
On Sat, 9 Oct 2010 12:28:44 +0200, Luca Berra wrote about Re: [Mageia-dev]
Proposal: Updating released versions (long post):
--repackage has been dropped from urpmi since it has been dropped from
rpm 4.6
Will you post it in Mdv Bugzilla?
TIA
=Dick Gevers=
Luca Berra a écrit :
On Sat, Oct 09, 2010 at 11:10:36AM +0200, Renaud MICHEL wrote:
On samedi 09 octobre 2010 at 05:45, andré wrote :
Note that configuration files that have been changed from the
installation default are often already saved. (Generally .old is
appended to the configuration
Frank Griffin a écrit :
Part of the recent thread about what the desirable release cycle should
be devolved into a discussion of how backports works and whether or not
it's suitable. I'd like to examine this issue.
The current urpmi repository architecture serves purposes that were
meaningful
andré skrev 9.10.2010 17:41:
BTW, a feature to blacklist the installation of a particular version of
a package would be very useful. I.e. an option never install this
package or never select automatically this package.
This would prevent a package found to be problematic on a particular
system
On Sat, Oct 09, 2010 at 01:16:09PM +, Dick Gevers wrote:
On Sat, 9 Oct 2010 12:28:44 +0200, Luca Berra wrote about Re: [Mageia-dev]
Proposal: Updating released versions (long post):
--repackage has been dropped from urpmi since it has been dropped from
rpm 4.6
Will you post it in Mdv
12 matches
Mail list logo
