Re: [Mageia-dev] base system size for next beta1

2011-03-18 Thread andre999
Anne nicolas a écrit : Hi there We've had quite a lot of comments, proved or not, about base system size. Looks like it's growing much too fast. So one job for next beta would be to investigate on this: - check real size - check deps - check rpmsrate for isos ... Comments welcome good

Re: [Mageia-dev] Alpha 2 fresh install dvd i586

2011-03-18 Thread andre999
Wolfgang Bornath a écrit : 2011/3/17 JA Magallónjamagal...@ono.com: If this option is not clearly visible, you can easily wipe windows boot menu and many users will be disappointed. No, because Mageia grub recognises a Windows installation and adds it to the boot menue. But I agree,

Re: [Mageia-dev] base system size for next beta1

2011-03-18 Thread Pascal Terjan
On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 08:05, andre999 and...@laposte.net wrote: In principle, I think it should be something required by virtually any working Mageia system. I notice  that there is a basesystem-minimal and a basesystem, which adds requires kernel and bootloader ?! (Both of which seem kind

Re: [Mageia-dev] base system size for next beta1

2011-03-18 Thread Thierry Vignaud
On 18 March 2011 08:05, andre999 and...@laposte.net wrote: good question In principle, I think it should be something required by virtually any working Mageia system. I notice  that there is a basesystem-minimal and a basesystem, which adds requires kernel and bootloader ?! (Both of which

Re: [Mageia-dev] base system size for next beta1

2011-03-18 Thread JA Magallón
On Thu, 17 Mar 2011 21:14:14 +0100, Anne nicolas enna...@gmail.com wrote: Hi there We've had quite a lot of comments, proved or not, about base system size. Looks like it's growing much too fast. So one job for next beta would be to investigate on this: - check real size - check deps -

Re: [Mageia-dev] base system size for next beta1

2011-03-18 Thread Thierry Vignaud
On 17 March 2011 21:14, Anne nicolas enna...@gmail.com wrote: Hi there We've had quite a lot of comments, proved or not, about base system size. Looks like it's growing much too fast. So one job for next beta would be to investigate on this: - check real size - check deps - check rpmsrate

Re: [Mageia-dev] RFT: Thunderbird, gnomevfs vs. GIO

2011-03-18 Thread Thierry Vignaud
On 18 March 2011 03:27, Ahmad Samir ahmadsamir3...@gmail.com wrote: gnome-vfs has been deprecated by Gvfs/GIO a long time ago[1]. I think now is a good time thunderbird gets built with gio support (and disable gnome-vfs support); it's long enough before Mageia's first stable release that bugs

Re: [Mageia-dev] Mageia default Input platform policy

2011-03-18 Thread Thierry Vignaud
On 18 March 2011 00:08, Thierry Vignaud thierry.vign...@gmail.com wrote: For Mageia 1, we can keep both, and make sure they work fine. drakxtools allows to chose between the two. ibus should probably be preferred if we get it to work fine, we would have trouble solving scim issues since it is

[Mageia-dev] removing packages from svn

2011-03-18 Thread nicolas vigier
Hello, When we are removing a package from svn because it is no more wanted on the repository, we usually do svn rm. However it makes it more difficult to see old packages, or see it existed if we want to reimport it. So I think it would be better to move it to an other directory. Packages are

Re: [Mageia-dev] removing packages from svn

2011-03-18 Thread Maarten Vanraes
Op vrijdag 18 maart 2011 17:22:12 schreef nicolas vigier: Hello, When we are removing a package from svn because it is no more wanted on the repository, we usually do svn rm. However it makes it more difficult to see old packages, or see it existed if we want to reimport it. So I think it

[Mageia-dev] base system size for next beta1

2011-03-18 Thread 'Priscus' Hugot
Greetings, As JA Magallón suspected, the problem is in the installer, not the packages requirements: kdelibs4-core and phonon-gstreamer are automatically selected, even for a minimal install (along with their own dependencies, ending at about 550 packages total, and over 800 Mbytes). Bug

Re: [Mageia-dev] base system size for next beta1

2011-03-18 Thread Thierry Vignaud
On 18 March 2011 18:51, 'Priscus' Hugot wizz...@twa-corbies.net wrote: As JA Magallón suspected, the problem is in the installer, not the packages requirements: Wrong urpmi -v --debug basesystem showed the same behavior. This is because the stage2 wasn't updated with

Re: [Mageia-dev] second impressions of mageia 1 alpha 2 (upgrade from MDV 2010 x86_64 PWP)

2011-03-18 Thread Maarten Vanraes
Op vrijdag 18 maart 2011 01:55:13 schreef Maarten Vanraes: Hello, first i noticed that 64bit iso is 3.8GB, while 32bit is more than 4GB. upgrading mdv 2010.1 x86_64 PWP with mageia 1 alpha 2 x86_64 DVD: - i noticed that the delay in text is still there during boot from DVD(#61) - in

Re: [Mageia-dev] base system size for next beta1

2011-03-18 Thread Maarten Vanraes
Op vrijdag 18 maart 2011 20:29:46 schreef Thierry Vignaud: 1) Please STOP creating new threads. On 18 March 2011 20:13, 'Priscus' Hugot wizz...@twa-corbies.net wrote: I could have said it more clearly, then, but definitely not wrong: by installer, I (and most probably Magallón too) meant

Re: [Mageia-dev] RFT: Thunderbird, gnomevfs vs. GIO

2011-03-18 Thread Ahmad Samir
On 18 March 2011 12:33, Frank Griffin f...@roadrunner.com wrote: On 03/17/2011 10:27 PM, Ahmad Samir wrote: On 18 March 2011 00:25, Ahmad Samirahmadsamir3...@gmail.com  wrote: gnome-vfs has been deprecated by Gvfs/GIO a long time ago[1]. Has this any relation to

Re: [Mageia-dev] removing packages from svn

2011-03-18 Thread nicolas vigier
On Sat, 19 Mar 2011, Ahmad Samir wrote: On 18 March 2011 18:41, Olivier Blin mag...@blino.org wrote: nicolas vigier bo...@mars-attacks.org writes: Hello, When we are removing a package from svn because it is no more wanted on the repository, we usually do svn rm. However it makes it

Re: [Mageia-dev] Chinese fonts

2011-03-18 Thread Kira
在 Sat, 19 Mar 2011 13:46:21 +0800, Ahmad Samir ahmadsamir3...@gmail.com寫道: From bug: https://bugs.mageia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=235 I don't know which font is used by default nor which one would be best... My main question is, does anyone who know Chinese can reproduce this issue? also does