hi,
after release, there are a lot of perl modules to be updated (at least
196 regular modules according to magpie).
however, please refrain from updating them: i'd like first to update
perl to 5.14.0, which is binary incompatible with perl 5.12.3.
therefore, updating perl modules after 5.14
root-odjjhxpcy38dnm+yrof...@public.gmane.org skrev 30.5.2011 14:44:
Revision
1601
Author
pterjan
Date
2011-05-30 13:44:17 +0200 (Mon, 30 May 2011)
Log Message
Do not append .%distro_section if section is core
[...]
Modified: rpm/rpm-setup/trunk/build.macros.in
On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 13:08, Thomas Backlund t...@mageia.org wrote:
root-odjjhxpcy38dnm+yrof...@public.gmane.org skrev 30.5.2011 14:44:
Revision
1601
Author
pterjan
Date
2011-05-30 13:44:17 +0200 (Mon, 30 May 2011)
Log Message
Do not append .%distro_section if section
On Mon, 30 May 2011, Michael Scherer wrote:
Hi,
as we have uploaded the new version of mageia-release, some of you may
have seen that urpmi sources have been changed to use
distrib/1/ instead of distrib/cauldron/ , especially if you didn't touch
to the default configuration.
Not all
Le lundi 30 mai 2011 à 18:42 +0200, nicolas vigier a écrit :
On Mon, 30 May 2011, Michael Scherer wrote:
Hi,
as we have uploaded the new version of mageia-release, some of you may
have seen that urpmi sources have been changed to use
distrib/1/ instead of distrib/cauldron/ ,
mån 2011-05-30 klockan 22:39 +0300 skrev Daniel Le Berre:
Le 30/05/2011 19:55, Michael Scherer a écrit :
We should have waited before uploading this rpm.
People being upgraded to stable is a demand from users ( see -discuss ),
and that would have been saner to wait at least until
Le 30/05/2011 22:18, Thomas Backlund a écrit :
mån 2011-05-30 klockan 23:15 +0300 skrev Thomas Backlund:
mån 2011-05-30 klockan 22:39 +0300 skrev Daniel Le Berre:
Le 30/05/2011 19:55, Michael Scherer a écrit :
We should have waited before uploading this rpm.
People being upgraded to stable
Le 30/05/2011 22:34, Daniel Le Berre a écrit :
Le 30/05/2011 22:18, Thomas Backlund a écrit :
mån 2011-05-30 klockan 23:15 +0300 skrev Thomas Backlund:
mån 2011-05-30 klockan 22:39 +0300 skrev Daniel Le Berre:
Le 30/05/2011 19:55, Michael Scherer a écrit :
We should have waited before
On Mon, 30 May 2011 23:18:54 +0300, Thomas Backlund t...@mageia.org wrote:
mån 2011-05-30 klockan 23:15 +0300 skrev Thomas Backlund:
That should be:
mageia-release-common-1-2.mga1
mageia-release-Default-1.2.mga1
Well, as I did not update today until late at night (spain timezone), I
2011/5/31 JA Magallón jamagal...@ono.com:
On Mon, 30 May 2011 23:18:54 +0300, Thomas Backlund t...@mageia.org wrote:
mån 2011-05-30 klockan 23:15 +0300 skrev Thomas Backlund:
That should be:
mageia-release-common-1-2.mga1
mageia-release-Default-1.2.mga1
Well, as I did not update today
freetype2 didn't get a tainted build yet; I've committed the changes
in SVN; not sure if there's still time to submit it, but ideally it
wouldn't affect the release ISO's as they'll only have the non-tainted
freetype2 build.
--
Ahmad Samir
Is there any specific reason (regressions, incompatibilites?) why Mageia
(and Mandriva) still ships dkms 2.0.19 even though 2.1.1.2 is the latest
upstream release, or is it simply because nobody has updated the package?
--
Mageia ML Forum Gateway: http://mageia.linuxtech.net/forum/
I thought the core build of freetype2 already has the bytecode interpreter
enabled (since the patent expired).
Why is there still a need for a tainted version?
--
Mageia ML Forum Gateway: http://mageia.linuxtech.net/forum/
13 matches
Mail list logo
