Op vrijdag 02 september 2011 05:38:01 schreef Funda Wang:
2011/9/2 Thomas Spuhler tho...@btspuhler.com:
When upgrading lilypond I noticed that someone else mad the doc package
noarch to make the huge doc subpackage be noarch
1. What is the advantage of this? We have noarch packages in
On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 03:57, Thomas Spuhler tho...@btspuhler.com wrote:
When upgrading lilypond I noticed that someone else mad the doc package noarch
to make the huge doc subpackage be noarch
1. What is the advantage of this? We have noarch packages in i586 and x86_64
anyway
They are
02.09.2011 10:15, Pascal Terjan kirjutas:
Yes there is still a bug in the build system, packages switching
between arch/noarch are not deleted
Is there bug about this issue? Who should fix it?
--
Sander
On 2 September 2011 03:23, Funda Wang fundaw...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
Is there any possibility that we ship libpng 1.5.x as default for
mga2? My idea will be:
* libpng = 1.5.x for default installation
* libpng12, libpng12-devel for old packages which cannot be rebuilt or
some other
'Twas brillig, and Olivier Blin at 01/09/11 22:40 did gyre and gimble:
- network config is by default user-dependant, and not available in
display manager
Just on this small point... The latest GDM exposes networking config
with network manager in the DM. Not tried playing with it (too busy
Le 02/09/2011 09:48, Colin Guthrie a écrit :
fighting intel driver issues - quite crashy), but to save e.g. any wifi
passwords, you'd have to enter the root password.
Which seems to be the rule for all shared connections for 0.9 branch.
--
BOFH excuse #296:
The hardware bus needs a new
'Twas brillig, and Guillaume Rousse at 02/09/11 09:07 did gyre and gimble:
Le 02/09/2011 09:48, Colin Guthrie a écrit :
fighting intel driver issues - quite crashy), but to save e.g. any wifi
passwords, you'd have to enter the root password.
Which seems to be the rule for all shared
Le jeudi 1 septembre 2011 23:57:50, Thomas Spuhler a écrit :
When upgrading lilypond I noticed that someone else mad the doc package
noarch to make the huge doc subpackage be noarch
1. What is the advantage of this? We have noarch packages in i586 and
x86_64 anyway
2. The result wasn't as
On 09/01/2011 11:38 PM, Funda Wang wrote:
We may split noarch packages into a new directory in the future, like
what opensuse is doing. That will save a lot of space for mirrors.
Whoever finally decided this, your children and your children's
children will rise up and call you blessed :-)
Le vendredi 02 septembre 2011 à 11:38 +0800, Funda Wang a écrit :
2011/9/2 Thomas Spuhler tho...@btspuhler.com:
When upgrading lilypond I noticed that someone else mad the doc package
noarch
to make the huge doc subpackage be noarch
1. What is the advantage of this? We have noarch
FYI, I'm rsync'ing distrib-coffee with -lH flags, and watching
lilypond-doc download in full to each of the tree directories. Either
distrib isn't rsync'ing correctly (unlikely), or lilypond-doc isn't
packaged as a link ?
Any other opinions?
2011/9/2 Thierry Vignaud thierry.vign...@gmail.com:
On 2 September 2011 03:23, Funda Wang fundaw...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
Is there any possibility that we ship libpng 1.5.x as default for
mga2? My idea will be:
* libpng = 1.5.x for default installation
* libpng12,
On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 4:04 PM, Funda Wang fundaw...@gmail.com wrote:
Any other opinions?
i do not see any pb as we are early in mga 2 development and as you
keep libpng12 in parallel.
for me this is a please do.
2011/9/2 Thierry Vignaud thierry.vign...@gmail.com:
On 2 September 2011 03:23,
On 2 September 2011 14:06, Michael Scherer m...@zarb.org wrote:
It would help would be by having smaller hdlists, but I am not sure it
would really help mirror so much. ( ie, I would not say lots of space
even if that still a saving )
Actualy hdlist are pretty much unused these days.
urpmi
2011/9/2 Thierry Vignaud thierry.vign...@gmail.com:
On 2 September 2011 03:23, Funda Wang fundaw...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
Is there any possibility that we ship libpng 1.5.x as default for
mga2? My idea will be:
* libpng = 1.5.x for default installation
* libpng12, libpng12-devel for old
Op vrijdag 02 september 2011 16:50:00 schreef Thierry Vignaud:
On 2 September 2011 14:06, Michael Scherer m...@zarb.org wrote:
It would help would be by having smaller hdlists, but I am not sure it
would really help mirror so much. ( ie, I would not say lots of space
even if that still a
Am 02.09.2011 20:15, schrieb Maarten Vanraes:
Op vrijdag 02 september 2011 16:50:00 schreef Thierry Vignaud:
On 2 September 2011 14:06, Michael Schererm...@zarb.org wrote:
It would help would be by having smaller hdlists, but I am not sure it
would really help mirror so much. ( ie, I would
On Thu, 01 Sep 2011 06:43:17 -0400, Buchan Milne bgmi...@staff.telkomsa.net
wrote:
On Thursday, 1 September 2011 12:12:46 Samuel Verschelde wrote:
Le jeudi 25 août 2011 11:03:42, David W. Hodgins a écrit :
If the Mandriva way is kept, we must ensure all needed dependencies
are available in
2011/9/2 Thierry Vignaud thierry.vign...@gmail.com:
On 2 September 2011 14:06, Michael Scherer m...@zarb.org wrote:
It would help would be by having smaller hdlists, but I am not sure it
would really help mirror so much. ( ie, I would not say lots of space
even if that still a saving )
19 matches
Mail list logo
