Hi,
I have run liveusb-creator and it does not detect the usb stick, no
matter if i unplug and plug the usb stick it continues without being
detected.
The same problem also happens in unetbootin, so currently in Mageia
there is no application providing a GUI to burn .iso images into usb
discs.
15.06.2012 18:24, Damien Lallement kirjutas:
> Le 15/06/2012 16:57, Angelo Naselli a écrit :
>>> I think this would be worth a backport to mga2 - a lot of people will look
>>> for it and most don't have a clue how to get stuff from Cauldron and that
>>> it is safe to do so (mixing Cauldron and sta
Le 15/06/2012 16:57, Angelo Naselli a écrit :
I think this would be worth a backport to mga2 - a lot of people will look
for it and most don't have a clue how to get stuff from Cauldron and that
it is safe to do so (mixing Cauldron and stable being bad idea in general).
Backports are not open y
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Il 15/06/2012 19:56, Sander Lepik ha scritto:
> 15.06.2012 20:43, Claire Robinson kirjutas:
>> Shouldn't this be a normal update to get-skype rather than a
>> backport?
That's why i said what maintainer and our policy can do :D
> So long there is no
15.06.2012 20:43, Claire Robinson kirjutas:
> Shouldn't this be a normal update to get-skype rather than a backport?
>
> Claire
>
So long there is no reason to do that. 2.0.0.35 is still available and has no
know secuirty
issues.
--
Sander
On 15/06/12 18:37, Angelo Naselli wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Well, it's only the tag in name (mga3) that changes. Nothing
else.
In this case yes, but other folks who don't know the package
might not know that and, buoyed by the success of installing this
package may
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
>>> Well, it's only the tag in name (mga3) that changes. Nothing
>>> else.
>>
>> In this case yes, but other folks who don't know the package
>> might not know that and, buoyed by the success of installing this
>> package may be tempted to install oth
On 15 June 2012 17:54, Colin Guthrie wrote:
But for that
you have to get the rpm manually from cauldron's repo.
>>> it's a noarch, and could be installed easily, but you
>>> will have a mga3 package in your mga1 or mga2 distro
>>>
>>> Angelo
>> Well, it's only the tag in name (mga3)
'Twas brillig, and Sander Lepik at 15/06/12 16:18 did gyre and gimble:
> 15.06.2012 17:59, Angelo Naselli kirjutas:
>> venerdì 15 giugno 2012 alle 14:45, Sander Lepik ha scritto:
>>> But for that
>>> you have to get the rpm manually from cauldron's repo.
>> it's a noarch, and could be installed eas
15.06.2012 17:59, Angelo Naselli kirjutas:
> venerdì 15 giugno 2012 alle 14:45, Sander Lepik ha scritto:
>> But for that
>> you have to get the rpm manually from cauldron's repo.
> it's a noarch, and could be installed easily, but you
> will have a mga3 package in your mga1 or mga2 distro
>
> A
venerdì 15 giugno 2012 alle 14:45, Sander Lepik ha scritto:
> But for that
> you have to get the rpm manually from cauldron's repo.
it's a noarch, and could be installed easily, but you
will have a mga3 package in your mga1 or mga2 distro
Angelo
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally
> I think this would be worth a backport to mga2 - a lot of people will look
> for it and most don't have a clue how to get stuff from Cauldron and that
> it is safe to do so (mixing Cauldron and stable being bad idea in general).
Backports are not open yet, they should be soon, at the end of our
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 4:00 PM, Colin Guthrie wrote:
> 'Twas brillig, and D.Morgan at 15/06/12 14:38 did gyre and gimble:
>> On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 3:23 PM, David Walser wrote:
>>> --- On Fri, 6/15/12, Colin Guthrie wrote:
From: Colin Guthrie
Subject: Re: [Mageia-dev] unpackaged fil
'Twas brillig, and D.Morgan at 15/06/12 14:38 did gyre and gimble:
> On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 3:23 PM, David Walser wrote:
>> --- On Fri, 6/15/12, Colin Guthrie wrote:
>>> From: Colin Guthrie
>>> Subject: Re: [Mageia-dev] unpackaged files lurking in the weeds
>>> To: "Mageia development mailing-l
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 3:23 PM, David Walser wrote:
> --- On Fri, 6/15/12, Colin Guthrie wrote:
>> From: Colin Guthrie
>> Subject: Re: [Mageia-dev] unpackaged files lurking in the weeds
>> To: "Mageia development mailing-list"
>> Cc: "David Walser"
>> Date: Friday, June 15, 2012, 4:53 AM
>> '
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 2:45 PM, Sander Lepik wrote:
> It should be possible to run it on mga1 and mga2 too (i'm using it on
> mga2). But for that
> you have to get the rpm manually from cauldron's repo.
>
>
I think this would be worth a backport to mga2 - a lot of people will look
for it and mo
--- On Fri, 6/15/12, Colin Guthrie wrote:
> From: Colin Guthrie
> Subject: Re: [Mageia-dev] unpackaged files lurking in the weeds
> To: "Mageia development mailing-list"
> Cc: "David Walser"
> Date: Friday, June 15, 2012, 4:53 AM
> 'Twas brillig, and David Walser at
> 15/06/12 01:42 did gyre an
15.06.2012 15:24, John kirjutas:
>>> Eh? All I can see is version 2.2.0.35 ??
>>>
>>> John
>> Are you using cauldron? Is your mirror synced?
> Opps!! Goes back to hole - looking in wrong box :-)
>
> John
It should be possible to run it on mga1 and mga2 too (i'm using it on mga2).
But for that
you
On Fri, 15 Jun 2012 15:16:09 +0300
Sander Lepik wrote:
> 15.06.2012 15:14, John kirjutas:
> > On Fri, 15 Jun 2012 10:40:48 +0200
> > D.Morgan wrote:
> >
> >> this is in nonfree already
> > Eh? All I can see is version 2.2.0.35 ??
> >
> > John
> Are you using cauldron? Is your mirror synced?
Opps!
Le 15/06/2012 14:14, John a écrit :
Eh? All I can see is version 2.2.0.35 ??
Read again
"I run Mageia Cauldron 64bit mostly - would be great to get a package in
Cauldron for our Distro!"
15.06.2012 15:14, John kirjutas:
> On Fri, 15 Jun 2012 10:40:48 +0200
> D.Morgan wrote:
>
>> this is in nonfree already
> Eh? All I can see is version 2.2.0.35 ??
>
> John
Are you using cauldron? Is your mirror synced?
--
Sander
On Fri, 15 Jun 2012 10:40:48 +0200
D.Morgan wrote:
> this is in nonfree already
Eh? All I can see is version 2.2.0.35 ??
John
On Fri, 2012-06-15 at 10:40 +0200, D.Morgan wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 10:25 AM, Robert Fox wrote:
> > I don't know about you guys, but I've been waiting for this release for
> > some time - unfortunately, they only offer it for the "other"
> > distributions:
> >
> > Select your Linux distri
On 15 June 2012 12:20, Pascal Terjan wrote:
>> see with upstream. We won't change the behaviour of rpm for this "only
>> in mageia" and be inconsistent with fedora/opensuse/...
>
> Isn't it the upstream behavior already that he is describing?
He's basically complaining that mdv's rpm behavior dif
On Fri, 15 Jun 2012, Shlomi Fish wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I would like to prepare Mageia packages for more UNIX fortune cookies'
> collections (see the fortune-mod program and
> http://www.shlomifish.org/humour/fortunes/ ), but I'm wondering when it is
> acceptable to package them and when it wouldn'
Hi all,
I would like to prepare Mageia packages for more UNIX fortune cookies'
collections (see the fortune-mod program and
http://www.shlomifish.org/humour/fortunes/ ), but I'm wondering when it is
acceptable to package them and when it wouldn't be, given that fortune files
often contain texts an
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 10:38 AM, D.Morgan wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 10:53 AM, Colin Guthrie wrote:
>> 'Twas brillig, and David Walser at 15/06/12 01:42 did gyre and gimble:
>>> So, maybe we should do something about this. My preference would
>>> have rpm still complain about unpackaged %
Hi!
Attached you'll find an updated version of the patch that gives %setup
special behaviour for ruby gems.
This takes care of automatically extracting the data.tar.gz as well so
that it's no longer necessary to manually extract it after %setup in
%prep.
It also replaces use of the obsolete rinde
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 10:53 AM, Colin Guthrie wrote:
> 'Twas brillig, and David Walser at 15/06/12 01:42 did gyre and gimble:
>> So, maybe we should do something about this. My preference would
>> have rpm still complain about unpackaged %excluded files, but not
>> die, just give a warning inst
'Twas brillig, and David Walser at 15/06/12 01:42 did gyre and gimble:
> So, maybe we should do something about this. My preference would
> have rpm still complain about unpackaged %excluded files, but not
> die, just give a warning instead.
Personally, I don't see the point in using %exclude to
On Thu, 14 Jun 2012, David Walser wrote:
>
> So, maybe we should do something about this. My preference would have rpm
> still complain about unpackaged %excluded files, but not die, just give a
> warning instead.
My preference would be to keep upstream behaviour. And I see that the
patch has
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 10:25 AM, Robert Fox wrote:
> I don't know about you guys, but I've been waiting for this release for
> some time - unfortunately, they only offer it for the "other"
> distributions:
>
> Select your Linux distribution
> Ubuntu 10.04 32-bit
> Ubuntu 10.04 64-bit
> Debian 6.0
I don't know about you guys, but I've been waiting for this release for
some time - unfortunately, they only offer it for the "other"
distributions:
Select your Linux distribution
Ubuntu 10.04 32-bit
Ubuntu 10.04 64-bit
Debian 6.0 32-bit
Debian 6.0 64-bit
Fedora 16 32bit
OpenSUSE 12.1 32bit
I ru
On Fri, 15 Jun 2012 01:07:20 -0400, andre999 wrote:
If the fact it is a backport is ignored, then every backport would be,
by definition, an update. Even packages newly imported to Mageia.
It depends on whether the user has set the backport repsository
as an update repository, or not.
Bac
34 matches
Mail list logo
