JA Magallón writes:
> On 09/24/2012 07:51 PM, Olav Vitters wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 12:42:58AM +0200, JA Magallón wrote:
>>> Perhaps polkit-gnome is out of sync ?
>>
>>>From the .spec:
>>
>> # install the autostart file manually, since upstream doesn't ship it any
>> more
>> # and decid
Thomas Backlund a écrit :
zezinho skrev 24.9.2012 12:52:
Em 24-09-2012 09:55, Thomas Backlund escreveu:
Just because they have a 64bit hw, it does not mean they have accees
to cheap bw since that depends on where they live, what isp they have,
and so on...
Well, we can't keep the same servic
Op dinsdag 25 september 2012 01:21:05 schreef andre999:
> Thomas Backlund a écrit :
> > andre999 skrev 24.9.2012 09:57:
> >> Anne Nicolas a écrit :
> >>> Hi there
> >>>
> >>> So here is the discussion about what isos we should keep or have for
> >>> final release. We had several (many!) proposals
Thomas Backlund a écrit :
andre999 skrev 24.9.2012 09:57:
Anne Nicolas a écrit :
Hi there
So here is the discussion about what isos we should keep or have for
final release. We had several (many!) proposals on that topics and we
need to take some decisions.
Here are some prerequisites I can s
On 2012-09-24 13:21 (GMT-0400) Liam R E Quin composed:
. rendering quality - irregularities tend to be distracting and cause
fatigue but people often say they like them at first;
Rendering quality is highly influenced by screen pixel density. The higher
the density, the more pixels are requir
On 2012-09-24 16:58 (GMT+0400) Dimitri composed:
The changes in default fonts might be related to recent
fonts-ttf-liberation update. Since 2.00, this package ships fontconfig
settings that by default substitute Liberation fonts for "sans-serif",
"serif" and "mono" families. This is done
by /etc
On 09/24/2012 07:51 PM, Olav Vitters wrote:
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 12:42:58AM +0200, JA Magallón wrote:
Perhaps polkit-gnome is out of sync ?
From the .spec:
# install the autostart file manually, since upstream doesn't ship it any more
# and decided that it's the job of each DE to start
Op maandag 24 september 2012 13:33:49 schreef Thomas Backlund:
> zezinho skrev 24.9.2012 12:52:
> > Em 24-09-2012 09:55, Thomas Backlund escreveu:
> >> Just because they have a 64bit hw, it does not mean they have accees
> >> to cheap bw since that depends on where they live, what isp they have,
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I finally got around to connecting my netbook, which has been running
Cauldron for some time. This was fully up to date before my holidays,
and apart from the recent display problem (which as Angelo Naselli
suspected, is a KDE problem) it has behaved
On 23/09/12 21:16, zezinho wrote:
"svn export" gives a better tarball...
Yes - thanks for the correction - maybe even better to use:
svn co https://svn.linuxsampler.org/svn/linuxsampler/trunk linuxsampler
tar -czf linuxsampler.tar.gz linuxsampler/ --exclude-vcs
.. which strips the svn stuff
On Mon, 2012-09-24 at 18:34 +0100, brian.sm...@blueyonder.co.uk wrote:
> I assume any default font should have the complete UTF8 Character set?
This isn't really meaningful, because of unification - fonts implement
glyphs, not characters, and there are a great many Unicode characters
that represe
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 12:42:58AM +0200, JA Magallón wrote:
> Perhaps polkit-gnome is out of sync ?
>From the .spec:
# install the autostart file manually, since upstream doesn't ship it any more
# and decided that it's the job of each DE to start
polkit-gnome-authentication-agent-1
# this does
On Monday 24 Sep 2012 13:21:58 Liam R E Quin wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-09-24 at 15:57 +0200, EatDirt wrote:
> > I think we should pay attention to the default fonts we will choose for
> > mga3, indeed. That's the very first reflex of any user, either you like,
> > or you don't, that would even deserve
On Mon, 2012-09-24 at 15:57 +0200, EatDirt wrote:
> I think we should pay attention to the default fonts we will choose for
> mga3, indeed. That's the very first reflex of any user, either you like,
> or you don't, that would even deserve a contest may be.
Reaction to typefaces depends on sever
On 24/09/12 14:58, Dimitri wrote:
Hi guys,
The changes in default fonts might be related to recent
fonts-ttf-liberation update. Since 2.00, this package ships fontconfig
settings that by default substitute Liberation fonts for "sans-serif",
"serif" and "mono" families. This is done
by /etc/fonts
Hi guys,
The changes in default fonts might be related to recent
fonts-ttf-liberation update. Since 2.00, this package ships fontconfig
settings that by default substitute Liberation fonts for "sans-serif",
"serif" and "mono" families. This is done
by /etc/fonts/conf.d/59-liberation-*.conf files (
Thomas Backlund a écrit :
>
>
>
> Actually the way to fix it is to look at the error to help narrow down
> where the fix is needed:
>
>
>
> --
> Thomas
I won ...
I found that there is only one Makefile.in to modify
1 chance among more that 2 millions combinations ... and I did it,
thanks fo
Thomas Backlund writes:
> and the technical side:
> - stuffing more than one DE on liveDVDs means altering build process,
It should be fine already.
IIRC, dual-desktop live systems were done at Mandriva.
> also giving more problem for little if any gain
> - every DE on liveDVDs still need
Thomas Backlund a écrit :
> PhilippeDidier skrev 24.9.2012 14:25:
>>
>> Hey ! You ! you are a happiness breaker :-(
>>
>
> [...]
>>
>> Argh !
>> You killed me ;-(
>>
>
> Nope, just showing how to learn about and fix some problems :)
>
>> Mageia will have to wait for sometime :...
>> There are 2
PhilippeDidier skrev 24.9.2012 14:25:
Hey ! You ! you are a happiness breaker :-(
[...]
Argh !
You killed me ;-(
Nope, just showing how to learn about and fix some problems :)
Mageia will have to wait for sometime :...
There are 21 makefiles
There are 0 or 1 or 2 links to add to them
Thomas Backlund a écrit :
>>> writes:
>> Hello !
>> Some news :
>> Indeed it was more difficult than I thought :
>> There were 21 different Makefile.in in 21 directories to modify :
>> I wrote a patch that replaces
>> -LDFLAGS = @LDFLAGS@
>> by
>> +LDFLAGS = @LDFLAGS@ -lpthread
>> in each of them
On Sun, 23 Sep 2012 11:30:49 +0200
eatdirt wrote:
> Hi,
> is that a bug that all default fonts on kdm, firefox, terminal titles
> changed to an ugly one? ;)
>
I noticed the change too on my system - Mageia 3/Cauldron x86-64 , KDE 4.9.1,
Core i3 machine.
Regards,
Shlomi Fish
> cheer
On 09/24/2012 12:42 AM, JA Magallón wrote:
Hi...
After latest updates GDM works again, but
I get a sad-computer-screen-of-death when I try to log in in Gnome.
The culprit seems to be the gnome-shell / polkit interaction.
With startx from vconsole I get this on .xsession-errors:
Window manager w
zezinho skrev 24.9.2012 12:52:
Em 24-09-2012 09:55, Thomas Backlund escreveu:
Just because they have a 64bit hw, it does not mean they have accees
to cheap bw since that depends on where they live, what isp they have,
and so on...
Well, we can't keep the same service to users without keeping
Em 24-09-2012 09:55, Thomas Backlund escreveu:
Just because they have a 64bit hw, it does not mean they have accees
to cheap bw since that depends on where they live, what isp they have,
and so on...
Well, we can't keep the same service to users without keeping the same
number of medias. And
On 23/09/12 14:28, brian.sm...@blueyonder.co.uk
wrote:
I noticed the change...
but on my machine it looks like an improvement
I don't know if just my eyesight or the change is having different effects on
different set ups.
I'm using X86-64 with a Radeon graphics card
On 24/09/12 08:31, Liutau
andre999 skrev 24.9.2012 09:57:
Anne Nicolas a écrit :
Hi there
So here is the discussion about what isos we should keep or have for
final release. We had several (many!) proposals on that topics and we
need to take some decisions.
Here are some prerequisites I can see for what I can read in c
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 24/09/12 08:26, Thierry Vignaud wrote:
> On 23 September 2012 11:18, Anne Wilson
> wrote:
Package nfs-utils blahblah is already installed
>>> nfs-common service, sorry.
>>>
>> That may well point to the problem, though I've no idea what
>> ne
On 23 September 2012 11:18, Anne Wilson wrote:
>>> Package nfs-utils blahblah is already installed
>> nfs-common service, sorry.
>>
> That may well point to the problem, though I've no idea what needs
> doing to solve it:
>
> service nfs-commons status
> Cannot find nfs-commons service
that's "nf
Anne Nicolas a écrit :
Hi there
So here is the discussion about what isos we should keep or have for
final release. We had several (many!) proposals on that topics and we
need to take some decisions.
Here are some prerequisites I can see for what I can read in comments
and review about Mageia o
30 matches
Mail list logo
