I just updated my cauldron to the latest packages, but some can't be installed
due to a file conflict.
=
To satisfy dependencies, the following packages are going to be installed:
PackageVersion Release Arch
(medium Core Release)
docbook-style-xsl
The are some problems with your rpm and urpmi installation. As you may
noticed, the conflicting files are from same packages but higher version.
Please upgrade your rpm and urpmi at first.
2012/11/7 Johnny A. Solbu coo...@solbu.net
I just updated my cauldron to the latest packages, but some
On Wednesday 07 November 2012 09:23, Funda Wang wrote:
The are some problems with your rpm and urpmi installation. As you may
noticed, the conflicting files are from same packages but higher version.
I just did. and those packages where the last ones.
==
rpm -qi rpm urpmi|grep Install Date
On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 8:55 AM, Johnny A. Solbu coo...@solbu.net wrote:
On Wednesday 07 November 2012 09:29, Johnny A. Solbu wrote:
I just did. and those packages where the last ones.
Just to be clear, to avoid any misunderstanding.
I updated some 1570 packages (urpmi --auto-update), and
On Wednesday 07 November 2012 10:07, Pascal Terjan wrote:
what does rpm -qa docbook-style-xsl say?
LC_ALL=C rpm -qa docbook-style-xsl
error: rpmdbNextIterator: skipping h#1596 Header SHA1 digest: BAD
Expected(c6ed3d6bd8d5eb24a8d846991acbb3a7470ae598) !=
Funda Wang skrev 7.11.2012 07:04:
Hello,
Could sysadmin push new rpmlint-mageia-policy to our ifra so that we
could deal with new libreoffice and some other ruby packages.
Thanks.
rpmlint-mageia-policy-0.2.24-1 is now installed.
--
Thomas
On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 10:16:10AM +0200, Olav Vitters wrote:
On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 09:50:16AM +0200, Oliver Burger wrote:
In what way does that touch Mageia aside from GNOME packaging?
We can't abandon Python 2 in the distro since there's loads of
Python 2 software out there.
So this
On 7 November 2012 00:33, anssi buildsystem-dae...@mageia.org wrote:
anssi anssi 11.2.202.251-1.mga3:
+ Revision: 315408
- new version 11.2.202.251
o fixes CVE-2012-5274, CVE-2012-5275, CVE-2012-5276, CVE-2012-5277,
CVE-2012-5278, CVE-2012-5279, CVE-2012-5280
This should be pushed as
Hi all,
well it is very pleasing to see there is discussion about Admin Panel on
the very day it is uploaded, I hope such enthusiasm continues.
I think I have just learned another lesson, and that is that I should
have made some sort of announcement prior to dumping the code in svn, so
here
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Official announcement! \o/
We still need to do a fair bit on the core of Admin Panel
I'd like to add a more scalable solution to load modules, so
that modules are able to be added without the need to change
core configuration, i will work on it
Le 07/11/2012 11:02, Thierry Vignaud a écrit :
On 7 November 2012 00:33, anssibuildsystem-dae...@mageia.org wrote:
anssianssi 11.2.202.251-1.mga3:
+ Revision: 315408
- new version 11.2.202.251
o fixes CVE-2012-5274, CVE-2012-5275, CVE-2012-5276, CVE-2012-5277,
CVE-2012-5278,
Le samedi 8 septembre 2012 08:26:04 Funda Wang a écrit :
Hello,
Hello,
As ruby 1.8 will be dead soon upstream, I'll push ruby 1.9 soon
directly to core/release. The plan is, for those modules which cannot
be built or run with ruby 1.9, or dead upstream, it should be dropped.
Could you have a
Em 06-11-2012 01:33, Johnny A. Solbu escreveu:
How is the procedure for adding games in «task-games».
Can I just add any game or is there a policy or rule as to whom, how or which
games can be added?
Just add the games you want : the idea is to install all good games in
one click.
Em 06-11-2012 10:01, Olav Vitters escreveu:
In case the drivers are not good enough, GNOME 3 will be unusable.
All is said here : I install lots of Mageia on bad hardware. Always used
KDE that disables eyecandy if drivers or hardware suck.
I don't think Gnome can afford Microsoft huge
Hi all,
On Wed, 7 Nov 2012 00:39:43 +0200
Shlomi Fish shlo...@shlomifish.org wrote:
Hi all,
I'm including here a draft of a letter we are planning to send to the Software
Freedom Law Center ( SFLC- http://www.softwarefreedom.org/ ) about faac vs.
cinelerra. (see the last meeting at
Le mardi 6 novembre 2012 23:39:43, Shlomi Fish a écrit :
So our question is: assuming we package faac as a package, can we still
provide pre-made and binary packages of GPLed programs that use it?
you can add few words about interoperability
http://interoperability-definition.info/en/
which
On Wednesday 07 November 2012 18:41, zezinho wrote:
Just add the games you want : the idea is to install all good games in
one click.
Nice. :-)=
Thank you.
--
Johnny A. Solbu
PGP key ID: 0xFA687324
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On Wednesday 07 November 2012 11:39, Pascal Terjan wrote:
LC_ALL=C rpm -qa docbook-style-xsl
error: rpmdbNextIterator: skipping h# 1596 Header SHA1 digest: BAD
Expected(c6ed3d6bd8d5eb24a8d846991acbb3a7470ae598) !=
(a8240d38d9d4fd25e5ed19a367ea386b4f4a4229)
So, it seems your rpm db
18 matches
Mail list logo
