On Thu, 13 Dec 2012 14:53:04 +0800
Joseph Wang joequ...@gmail.com wrote:
Looking over this page:
https://wiki.mageia.org/en/Python_policy
* python-pyp2rpm is undergoing review right now. Once it's in
cauldron, I'd like to
point to that package as something that packagers you should use
On Sun, 02 Dec 2012 10:32:41 +
Robert Wood robert.w...@apostrophe.co.uk wrote:
FWIW, I agree wholeheartedly with having a longer support time. Getting
Mageia 1 right on my laptop was a long and painful process; I feel I've
only just got it going (OK, it's a year down the line really) and
On Sun, 11 Nov 2012 11:12:41 +0100
Thierry Vignaud
thierry.vign...@gmail.com wrote:
On 9 November 2012 21:44, r...@mageia.org wrote:
Revision 6430 Author neoclust Date 2012-11-09 21:44:52 +0100 (Fri, 09 Nov
2012)
Log Message
Do not mix tabs and spaces
Please refrain to do this on
On Wed, 19 Sep 2012 09:40:27 +0200
Anne Nicolas enna...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi there
So here is the discussion about what isos we should keep or have for
final release. We had several (many!) proposals on that topics and we
need to take some decisions.
Here are some prerequisites I can see
On Wed, 19 Sep 2012 10:17:55 +0200
Pascal Terjan pter...@gmail.com wrote:
I would vote for
- Live DVDs (1 per arch)
- dual arch free CD
- dual arch nonfree CD
maybe we can replace the dual-arch CDs by enlarged boot.iso, need to
send more about it :)
I know machines with CD and not DVD
On Sat, 08 Sep 2012 13:00:32 +0200
eatdirt dirt...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
am I alone to get pthread segfaults in the log for various programs??
upowerd[759]: segfault at 0 ip 7f7a03efbfe0 sp 7fff5497d498
error 4 in libc-2.16.so[7f7a03dfc000+1a2000]
motion[3066]: segfault at 18 ip
On Mon, 20 Aug 2012 20:49:05 +0200
Guillaume Rousse
guillomovi...@gmail.com wrote:
Here are several packages candidate for removal:
- apache-mod_python: doesn't build with apache 2.4, unmaintained
upstream, dropped from fedora, no response from current maintainer
On Tue, 19 Jun 2012 14:01:53 +0200
Oliver Burger oliver@googlemail.com
wrote:
While looking into the Mageia2 python package I noticed we do have those
berkley db patches in the cauldron package we don't have in the Mga2 one:
On Mon, 18 Jun 2012 20:24:34 +0200
Oliver Burger oliver@googlemail.com
wrote:
Hi there,
I commited an update to the python package today to resolve
https://bugs.mageia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5843
Since python is a rather central and big package I'd like someone to
have a look at it
On Mon, 18 Jun 2012 21:32:24 +0200
Oliver Burger oliver@googlemail.com
wrote:
Am 18.06.2012 21:23, schrieb Antoine Pitrou:
Can the patch be viewed somewhere?
Of course:
http://svnweb.mageia.org/packages/cauldron/python/current/SOURCES/python-2.7.3-upstream-pypirc-secure.patch?revision
They definitely do.
Regards
Antoine.
On Sun, 22 Apr 2012 07:35:43 +0800
Funda Wang fundaw...@gmail.com wrote:
I guess yes. But I couldn't find relative notes in here:
http://www.python.org/news/security/
2012/4/22 David Walser luigiwalser-/e1597as9lqavxtiumw...@public.gmane.org:
Funda
On Thu, 19 Apr 2012 09:13:12 +0800
Funda Wang fundaw...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
Could somebody push python-2.7.3 and python3-3.2.3 into cauldron? They
fixed CVE-2012-0876, oCERT-2011-003, CVE-2012-0845, CVE-2011-3389,
and a lot of other minor bugs.
Note that oCERT-2011-003 is not plugged
On Fri, 24 Feb 2012 14:26:04 +0200
Buchan Milne
bgmi...@staff.telkomsa.net wrote:
I think rpmdrake should only show x86_64 packages
on x86_64 by default.
So, rpmdrake shouldn't show get-skype or wine32?
That sounds less usable to me.
I guess it could hide 32-bit packages when there's
On Fri, 24 Feb 2012 14:37:48 +0200
Buchan Milne
bgmi...@staff.telkomsa.net wrote:
On Friday, 24 February 2012 14:30:10 Antoine Pitrou wrote:
On Fri, 24 Feb 2012 14:26:04 +0200
Buchan Milne
bgmi...@staff.telkomsa.net wrote:
I think rpmdrake should only show x86_64 packages
On Thu, 12 Jan 2012 11:05:34 +0200
Buchan Milne bgmi...@zarb.org wrote:
An approach that doens't include a bug filed with the distribution means the
user doesn't really seem interested in receiving an update from the
distribution.
Do note there are bugs that may go unnoticed by the user
On Tue, 10 Jan 2012 20:28:15 -0600
Luis Daniel Lucio Quiroz
dlu...@okay.com.mx wrote:
You dont get me,
I mean, stop asking updates for mageia 1 just because there is another
newversion.
Uh.
As a Mageia user I would expect Mageia to package significant *bugfix
releases* and ship them in
On Wed, 11 Jan 2012 16:51:55 +0100
Guillaume Rousse
guillomovi...@gmail.com wrote:
Le 11/01/2012 16:09, Antoine Pitrou a écrit :
As a Mageia user I would expect Mageia to package significant *bugfix
releases* and ship them in the updates for the stable distro.
You'd rather read the current
On Wed, 11 Jan 2012 12:43:35 -0500
Juan Luis Baptiste juan...@mageia.org
wrote:
Sure, you cannot be save of regressions, but what makes you think you
are smarter than upstream? What makes you so sure that not the one
commit you add as a patch to your package is the one that causes the
On Wed, 11 Jan 2012 13:33:41 -0500
Juan Luis Baptiste juan...@mageia.org
wrote:
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 1:22 PM, Antoine Pitrou solip...@pitrou.net wrote:
On Wed, 11 Jan 2012 12:43:35 -0500
But how do you choose which patches you want to backport from the
stream of bugfixes done by upstream
On Wed, 11 Jan 2012 14:41:54 -0500
Juan Luis Baptiste juan...@mageia.org
wrote:
As I said, when there's a bug report on mga, we start investigating
the problem and go and look at upstream for a bug report there for
*that* particular bug.
So let me repeat myself from two messages above (!):
On Wed, 11 Jan 2012 15:13:05 -0500
Juan Luis Baptiste juan...@mageia.org
wrote:
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 3:05 PM, Antoine Pitrou solip...@pitrou.net wrote:
“Just because someone doesn't file a bug against Mageia doesn't mean the
bug doesn't bother anybody, because many users don't report
On Mon, 1 Aug 2011 14:50:10 +0200
Wolfgang Bornath molc...@googlemail.com
wrote:
2011/8/1 Sigrid Carrera sigrid.carr...@googlemail.com:
Hi Wolfgang, *,
On Mon, 1 Aug 2011 13:10:08 +0200
Wolfgang Bornath molc...@googlemail.com wrote:
As you see, my mileage varies from yours. :)
On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 14:14:02 +0200
Samuel Verschelde sto...@laposte.net
wrote:
Le mardi 14 juin 2011 13:56:29, Dexter Morgan a écrit :
Hello,
do we wait firefox 5 rc or we can start to update to firefox 5 soon ?
Mandriva now has several packages for firefox (like for chromium),
On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 18:09:23 +0200
Wolfgang Bornath molc...@googlemail.com
wrote:
- gmane is clumsy, slow - my tests last September/October reveilled
that with an active list you see 2 replies in the list before the
initial mail is available in gmane. So, people using gmane for posting
will
On Thu, 12 May 2011 01:56:25 +0100
Zé mmode...@gmail.com wrote:
Seams your confused, plf freetype it simply put fonts worst,,
Please don't mistake your opinions for facts.
As a user, I have always installed the PLF freetype (and I am still
enjoying it on the very machine I am typing this message
On Mon, 4 Apr 2011 14:13:43 +0200
Anne nicolas enn...@mageia.org wrote:
This is from my own experience. Now, I can manage to learn how to use nano
or vi (I use emacs personally), but editing in text console was such a pain
when I started using Linux until I found out about mcedit. So...
On Sun, 27 Mar 2011 17:11:07 +0200
Wolfgang Bornath molc...@googlemail.com
wrote:
2011/3/27 Tux99 tux99-...@uridium.org:
And why should all of us suffer the hassle of a DVD + a CD (how would that
work for all those that use USB-sticks, do they now need two sticks? And
do you expect
My two cents as an user:
Presumably, FLOSS supporters are satisfied with the state of the current
ISOs, and https://bugs.mageia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=523 would address
extending install functionality without changing the content of the
existing ISOs, which should be an improvement over
On Fri, 4 Mar 2011 14:21:08 +0100
Anne nicolas enna...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi there
I'm working on next isos for alpha2. Here is content I have for now:
http://pastebin.com/ekj2HVLq
Please have a look an check what could be missing as important
packages and we will see how we can deal with
On Wed, 19 Jan 2011 08:25:23 +0100
Michael scherer m...@zarb.org wrote:
I'm not sure about twice the work: you don't need to track twice the
software releases (except for the interpreter itself), or twice the
upstream patches, etc.
Well, if we handle this like 2 separates languages,
On Wed, 19 Jan 2011 00:55:40 +0100
Michael scherer m...@zarb.org wrote:
The solution of generating bytecode at install time looks fine. I am
not an RPM specialist though, but if you have non-RPM specific questions
feel free to ask them, I'd be glad to answer.
Well, that's not satisfying
On Sat, 8 Jan 2011 00:25:51 +0100
Anne nicolas enna...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi there
As planned in our last meeting, work has started with about 40
packagers who had already packager account in Mandriva Linux. They are
at the moment creating their account, getting right access and
importing
32 matches
Mail list logo
