On Thu, 13 Dec 2012 14:53:04 +0800
Joseph Wang wrote:
> Looking over this page:
>
> https://wiki.mageia.org/en/Python_policy
>
> * python-pyp2rpm is undergoing review right now. Once it's in
> cauldron, I'd like to
> point to that package as something that packagers you should use to
> get a f
On Sun, 02 Dec 2012 10:32:41 +
Robert Wood wrote:
> FWIW, I agree wholeheartedly with having a longer support time. Getting
> Mageia 1 right on my laptop was a long and painful process; I feel I've
> only just got it going (OK, it's a year down the line really) and I have
> to go through it
On Sun, 11 Nov 2012 11:12:41 +0100
Thierry Vignaud
wrote:
> On 9 November 2012 21:44, wrote:
> > Revision 6430 Author neoclust Date 2012-11-09 21:44:52 +0100 (Fri, 09 Nov
> > 2012)
> >
> > Log Message
> >
> > Do not mix tabs and spaces
>
> Please refrain to do this on soft you don't maintain.
>
On Wed, 19 Sep 2012 10:17:55 +0200
Pascal Terjan wrote:
>
> I would vote for
> - Live DVDs (1 per arch)
> - dual arch free CD
> - dual arch nonfree CD
>
> maybe we can replace the dual-arch CDs by enlarged boot.iso, need to
> send more about it :)
>
> I know machines with CD and not DVD still e
On Wed, 19 Sep 2012 09:40:27 +0200
Anne Nicolas wrote:
> Hi there
>
> So here is the discussion about what isos we should keep or have for
> final release. We had several (many!) proposals on that topics and we
> need to take some decisions.
>
> Here are some prerequisites I can see for what I
On Sat, 08 Sep 2012 13:00:32 +0200
eatdirt wrote:
> Hi,
> am I alone to get pthread segfaults in the log for various programs??
>
> upowerd[759]: segfault at 0 ip 7f7a03efbfe0 sp 7fff5497d498
> error 4 in libc-2.16.so[7f7a03dfc000+1a2000]
>
> motion[3066]: segfault at 18 ip 7f98abe7
On Mon, 20 Aug 2012 20:49:05 +0200
Guillaume Rousse
wrote:
> Here are several packages candidate for removal:
>
> - apache-mod_python: doesn't build with apache 2.4, unmaintained
> upstream, dropped from fedora, no response from current maintainer
> (https://bugs.mageia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7024
On Tue, 19 Jun 2012 14:01:53 +0200
Oliver Burger
wrote:
> While looking into the Mageia2 python package I noticed we do have those
> berkley db patches in the cauldron package we don't have in the Mga2 one:
> http://svnweb.mageia.org/packages/cauldron/python/current/SOURCES/Python-2.7.1-berkeley-
On Mon, 18 Jun 2012 21:32:24 +0200
Oliver Burger
wrote:
> Am 18.06.2012 21:23, schrieb Antoine Pitrou:
> > Can the patch be viewed somewhere?
>
> Of course:
> http://svnweb.mageia.org/packages/cauldron/python/current/SOURCES/python-2.7.3-upstream-pypirc-secure.patch?revision=
On Mon, 18 Jun 2012 20:24:34 +0200
Oliver Burger
wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I commited an update to the python package today to resolve
> https://bugs.mageia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5843
> Since python is a rather central and big package I'd like someone to
> have a look at it before I submit it to Cau
They definitely do.
Regards
Antoine.
On Sun, 22 Apr 2012 07:35:43 +0800
Funda Wang wrote:
> I guess yes. But I couldn't find relative notes in here:
> http://www.python.org/news/security/
>
> 2012/4/22 David Walser :
> > Funda Wang wrote:
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> Could somebody push python-2.7.
On Thu, 19 Apr 2012 09:13:12 +0800
Funda Wang wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Could somebody push python-2.7.3 and python3-3.2.3 into cauldron? They
> fixed CVE-2012-0876, oCERT-2011-003, CVE-2012-0845, CVE-2011-3389,
> and a lot of other minor bugs.
Note that oCERT-2011-003 is not plugged by default, bec
On Fri, 24 Feb 2012 14:37:48 +0200
Buchan Milne
wrote:
> On Friday, 24 February 2012 14:30:10 Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> > On Fri, 24 Feb 2012 14:26:04 +0200
> > Buchan Milne
> >
> > wrote:
> > > > I think rpmdrake should only show x86_64 packages
> &
On Fri, 24 Feb 2012 14:26:04 +0200
Buchan Milne
wrote:
>
> > I think rpmdrake should only show x86_64 packages
> > on x86_64 by default.
>
> So, rpmdrake shouldn't show get-skype or wine32?
>
> That sounds less usable to me.
I guess it could hide 32-bit packages when there's a 64-bit counterpa
On Wed, 22 Feb 2012 07:33:32 +0100
Marja van Waes wrote:
> Sounds indeed like there is no urgent reason for a change. Besides,
> python-virtualenv users who run both Mageia and Mandriva, or switch
> between them, will probably be glad the package behaves the same in both
> distro's :)
>
> It's
On Thu, 12 Jan 2012 11:05:34 +0200
Buchan Milne wrote:
>
> An approach that doens't include a bug filed with the distribution means the
> user doesn't really seem interested in receiving an update from the
> distribution.
Do note there are bugs that may go unnoticed by the user even though
the
On Wed, 11 Jan 2012 15:13:05 -0500
Juan Luis Baptiste
wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 3:05 PM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> >
> > “Just because someone doesn't file a bug against Mageia doesn't mean the
> > bug doesn't bother anybody, because many users don't
On Wed, 11 Jan 2012 14:41:54 -0500
Juan Luis Baptiste
wrote:
>
> As I said, when there's a bug report on mga, we start investigating
> the problem and go and look at upstream for a bug report there for
> *that* particular bug.
So let me repeat myself from two messages above (!):
“Just because s
On Wed, 11 Jan 2012 13:33:41 -0500
Juan Luis Baptiste
wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 1:22 PM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> > On Wed, 11 Jan 2012 12:43:35 -0500
> > But how do you choose which patches you want to backport from the
> > stream of bugfixes done by upstream?
&g
On Wed, 11 Jan 2012 12:43:35 -0500
Juan Luis Baptiste
wrote:
> > Sure, you cannot be save of regressions, but what makes you think you
> > are smarter than upstream? What makes you so sure that not the one
> > commit you add as a patch to your package is the one that causes the
> > regressions?
>
On Wed, 11 Jan 2012 16:51:55 +0100
Guillaume Rousse
wrote:
> Le 11/01/2012 16:09, Antoine Pitrou a écrit :
> > As a Mageia user I would expect Mageia to package significant *bugfix
> > releases* and ship them in the updates for the stable distro.
> You'd rather read th
On Tue, 10 Jan 2012 20:28:15 -0600
Luis Daniel Lucio Quiroz
wrote:
>
> You dont get me,
>
> I mean, stop asking updates for mageia 1 just because there is another
> newversion.
Uh.
As a Mageia user I would expect Mageia to package significant *bugfix
releases* and ship them in the updates for
On Mon, 1 Aug 2011 14:50:10 +0200
Wolfgang Bornath
wrote:
> 2011/8/1 Sigrid Carrera :
> > Hi Wolfgang, *,
> >
> > On Mon, 1 Aug 2011 13:10:08 +0200
> > Wolfgang Bornath wrote:
> >>
> >> As you see, my "mileage" varies from yours. :)
> >
> > Yes, indeed, the experiences vary. But this doesn't mean
On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 18:09:23 +0200
Wolfgang Bornath
wrote:
>
> - gmane is clumsy, slow - my tests last September/October reveilled
> that with an active list you see 2 replies in the list before the
> initial mail is available in gmane. So, people using gmane for posting
> will always be behind
On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 14:14:02 +0200
Samuel Verschelde
wrote:
>
> Le mardi 14 juin 2011 13:56:29, Dexter Morgan a écrit :
> > Hello,
> >
> > do we wait firefox 5 rc or we can start to update to firefox 5 soon ?
>
> Mandriva now has several packages for firefox (like for chromium), following
> th
On Thu, 12 May 2011 01:56:25 +0100
Zé wrote:
> Seams your confused, plf freetype it simply put fonts worst,,
Please don't mistake your opinions for facts.
As a user, I have always installed the PLF freetype (and I am still
enjoying it on the very machine I am typing this message on) because the
d
On Mon, 4 Apr 2011 14:13:43 +0200
Anne nicolas wrote:
> >
> > This is from my own experience. Now, I can manage to learn how to use nano
> > or vi (I use emacs personally), but editing in text console was such a pain
> > when I started using Linux until I found out about mcedit. So...
> >
> > Coul
On Sun, 27 Mar 2011 17:11:07 +0200
Wolfgang Bornath
wrote:
> 2011/3/27 Tux99 :
> >
> > And why should all of us suffer the hassle of a DVD + a CD (how would that
> > work for all those that use USB-sticks, do they now need two sticks? And
> > do you expect magazines to include a DVD+CD to please M
My two cents as an user:
> Presumably, FLOSS supporters are satisfied with the state of the current
> ISOs, and https://bugs.mageia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=523 would address
> extending install functionality without changing the content of the
> existing ISOs, which should be an improvement over w
On Fri, 4 Mar 2011 14:21:08 +0100
Anne nicolas wrote:
> Hi there
>
> I'm working on next isos for alpha2. Here is content I have for now:
> http://pastebin.com/ekj2HVLq
>
> Please have a look an check what could be missing as important
> packages and we will see how we can deal with it
Since I
On Wed, 19 Jan 2011 08:25:23 +0100
Michael scherer wrote:
>
> > I'm not sure about "twice the work": you don't need to track twice the
> > software releases (except for the interpreter itself), or twice the
> > upstream patches, etc.
>
> Well, if we handle this like 2 separates languages, that m
On Wed, 19 Jan 2011 00:55:40 +0100
Michael scherer wrote:
>
> > The solution of generating bytecode at install time looks fine. I am
> > not an RPM specialist though, but if you have non-RPM specific questions
> > feel free to ask them, I'd be glad to answer.
>
> Well, that's not satisfying from
On Mon, 17 Jan 2011 09:21:56 +0100
Michael scherer wrote:
>
> There is also the issue on bytecompilation (
> https://qa.mandriva.com/show_bug.cgi?id=50484 ).
> I have exposed there the various problem, and apart from explaining
> that the solution I chosed was not better than the other, no one
On Sat, 8 Jan 2011 00:25:51 +0100
Anne nicolas wrote:
> Hi there
>
> As planned in our last meeting, work has started with about 40
> packagers who had already packager account in Mandriva Linux. They are
> at the moment creating their account, getting right access and
> importing first packages.
34 matches
Mail list logo
