There actually only the unity packages needed to be compile against it
(which is no problem compile only these programs
against this patched gtk3 with a separate OBS project for unity :) )
2012/9/14 Pacho Ramos :
> El vie, 14-09-2012 a las 09:06 +0200, Damian Ivanov escribió:
>> > Co
>Better reasons than "all my friends have it".
Like in the last email, let's forget this argument and there are kick
ass reasons see previous mails,
It has a reason Mandriva searching for a new build system. And it
wouldn't be a start at step 1. It is an already
working alternative.
Here it is not like omg, I want to have my new toy, everybody has it.It is
wow lots of entreprise users reporting bugs. But ok, let's ignore that
point, there are other points.
;)
On Sep 14, 2012 6:54 PM, "Johnny A. Solbu" wrote:
> On Friday 14 September 2012 14:03, D
Hi Colin,
Thanks for you're answer!
> The "Here is my PPA where I do x, y and z" style approach to software
> repositories is always one we've deliberately avoided. It's creates
> significant problems for our (relatively) small teams when doing QA and
> addressing bug reports.
Agreed, I'm quite s
> Could both gtk+ versions be parallel instalable? (to keep using official
> gtk+ for most applications but those requiring ubuntu patches)
No, ubuntu patches patch actual files, it would not be possible to
have gtk2 + gtk2-module-ubuntu
> I'd rather have developers that actually use the distro they build for and
> test the fixes themselves too.
Oh, I use it on all my three private PC's
http://en.opensuse.org/openSUSE:Build_Service_comparison
http://blog.mandriva.com/en/2011/07/19/we-start-collecting-wishes-for-new-build-system/
There are lots of good reasons to switch to OBS
- OBS has a web interface ( lots of ppl including me do lot of
the spec file editing, patching etc. using the web interface from
windows e.g from work PC / mobile platforms)
- In OBS it's very easy to fix a package for everyone, if you have
an a
Hi,
> all that glitters is not gold... It's very hard to have a unique
> spec file, rpm macros, package names, etc are often if not always
> different, but i see some good things following libyui project...
I dind't say a unique spec file, the only things that differs are the
macros and the Requir
> You mean using opensuse build system?
Absolutely.
> As far as i can say adding the availability to build also mageia
> packages could be a good thing.
I think best would even be Mageia being build by OBS itself as whole
distribution.
> As far as user concerned though, using different repositori
I am not talking yet about getting unity included in Mageia, but to
have the repo that is available for openSUSE and Fedora users
available for Mageia too. Add repo ==> Update ==> install unity
> Well mentoring is important, users also but if there are zillions patches on
> core GNOME it's another
)
2012/9/12 Pacho Ramos :
> El mié, 12-09-2012 a las 12:33 +0200, Damian Ivanov escribió:
>> Hi,
>>
>>
>> My name isDamian Ivanov. Xiao-Long Chen and me are the maintainers of
>> unity desktop environment for openSUSE and Fedora, Xiao-Long
>> additionally maintains
he Mageia OBS backend, when it is fixed, is
there someone here interested in adjusting the spec files to Mageia?
Best regards,
Damian Ivanov
12 matches
Mail list logo
