Le 21/03/2011 16:10, Stefano Negro a écrit :
>
>
> 2011/3/21 Thorsten van Lil mailto:tv...@gmx.de>>
>
> The last time I installed Ubuntu (one year ago, i think) it detected my
> mandriva installation and set it up in the grub. Nevertheless it doesn't
> worked and I had to manipulate grub2
Le 11/01/2011 12:27, Michael Scherer a écrit :
>
> Le mardi 11 janvier 2011 à 08:17 +0100, Farfouille a écrit :
>> Le 11/01/2011 00:00, Michael Scherer a écrit :
>>>
>>> Le lundi 10 janvier 2011 à 21:02 +0100, Farfouille a écrit :
>>>
>>> The
Le 11/01/2011 08:07, Farfouille a écrit :
>
> Le 10/01/2011 23:45, Renaud MICHEL a écrit :
>>
>> On lundi 10 janvier 2011 at 21:02, Farfouille wrote :
>> I suppose this page is meant to replace
>> http://mageia.org/wiki/doku.php?id=java_policy
> Yes
I&
Le 10/01/2011 21:56, Romain d'Alverny a écrit :
>
> On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 21:02, Farfouille wrote:
>> Licence discrepency : dokuwiki template says licence is 'CC
>> Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported' but web application policy
>> (http://mageia.org/w
urce. But for something like NetBeans or
> Eclipse, that's going to be a lot of work
>
>
>
I propose to keep the restriction, but to allow some exception, mainly
blockbuster like
Eclipse and Netbeans in order to build an appealing distro.
Do you know other softwares that are worth to be exception ?
--
Farfouille
Le 11/01/2011 00:00, Michael Scherer a écrit :
>
> Le lundi 10 janvier 2011 à 21:02 +0100, Farfouille a écrit :
>
> The part about Requires should IMHO be pushed in rpm dependency solver .
Apologize for maybe a noob question (btw I'm a noob packager waiting for his
turn to be
Le 10/01/2011 23:45, Renaud MICHEL a écrit :
>
> On lundi 10 janvier 2011 at 21:02, Farfouille wrote :
> I suppose this page is meant to replace
> http://mageia.org/wiki/doku.php?id=java_policy
Yes
>
>
> About the GCJ section, how about replacing it with:
> "Buildin
are
Alike 3.0 Unported' but web application policy
(http://mageia.org/wiki/doku.php?id=web_applications_policy) claims 'Creative
Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 2.5 License' (end of the page)
Cheers
--
Farfouille
allowed by its licence, but I don't know if it is possible or desirable
to attribute some Mageia policy stuff to Fedora. Help on this point is welcome.
--
Farfouille
Le 08/01/2011 12:30, Renaud MICHEL a écrit :
>
> On samedi 08 janvier 2011 at 10:39, Farfouille wrote :
>> I will be very interested at least to try. I propose to work on it until
>> sunday evening and come back here with my attempt.
>
> Thank you, I will review it (from
it until sunday
evening and come back here with my attempt.
>
> --
> Mit freundlichen Grüßen
>
> Greetings
>
> Daniel Kreuter
--
farfouille
te, it supports only Java 1.4 and some stuff of 1.5, it has not
been updated since september 2009.
Therefore I think it is better to put effort on openjdk/icedtea and Oracle jdk
policies rather than gcj
My 2 cents.
Farfouille
Le 05/01/2011 15:24, Anne nicolas a écrit :
[...]
> If you have a *gmail* address could you please check you did receive
> your password. If not please ping me so that we can send it again
Only for those who have a *gmail* address or is it a typo ?
Btw, I have still not received any password.
Le 02/01/2011 19:56, Anne nicolas a écrit :
> 2011/1/2 Farfouille :
>> Le 02/01/2011 15:49, Anne nicolas a écrit :
>>> - all people in wiki list of packagers have been added in voters list
>>>
>> I'm afraid I've been forgotten. Despite I was able to
ou have enough people.
Farfouille - farfouille64 at laposte dot net
discussion
Cheers,
farfouille.
___
Mageia-dev mailing list
Mageia-dev@mageia.org
https://www.mageia.org/mailman/listinfo/mageia-dev
16 matches
Mail list logo
