On 10 November 2011 11:09, Colin Guthrie wrote:
>> as Anssi made me aware msec currently has a Requires on
>> sendmail-command for cauldron, this was the outcome of the
>> last discussion about msec / MTA.
>> However, currently in /etc/urpmi/prefer.vendor.list postfix
>> is preferred as sendmail-c
'Twas brillig, and Florian Hubold at 09/11/11 18:38 did gyre and gimble:
> Hi there,
>
> as Anssi made me aware msec currently has a Requires on
> sendmail-command for cauldron, this was the outcome of the
> last discussion about msec / MTA.
> However, currently in /etc/urpmi/prefer.vendor.list po
Michael Scherer a écrit :
Le mercredi 09 novembre 2011 à 22:41 +0200, Anssi Hannula a écrit :
On 09.11.2011 22:34, Florian Hubold wrote:
Am 09.11.2011 20:48, schrieb Michael Scherer:
Le mercredi 09 novembre 2011 à 19:38 +0100, Florian Hubold a écrit :
Hi there,
as
Le mercredi 09 novembre 2011 à 22:41 +0200, Anssi Hannula a écrit :
> On 09.11.2011 22:34, Florian Hubold wrote:
> > Am 09.11.2011 20:48, schrieb Michael Scherer:
> >> Le mercredi 09 novembre 2011 à 19:38 +0100, Florian Hubold a écrit :
> >>> Hi there,
> >>>
> >>> as Anssi made me aware msec curren
Le Wed, 09 Nov 2011 19:38:07 +0100,
Florian Hubold a écrit :
> Hi there,
>
> as Anssi made me aware msec currently has a Requires on
> sendmail-command for cauldron, this was the outcome of the
> last discussion about msec / MTA.
> However, currently in /etc/urpmi/prefer.vendor.list postfix
> is
Am 09.11.2011 21:41, schrieb Anssi Hannula:
On 09.11.2011 22:34, Florian Hubold wrote:
Am 09.11.2011 20:48, schrieb Michael Scherer:
Le mercredi 09 novembre 2011 à 19:38 +0100, Florian Hubold a écrit :
Hi there,
as Anssi made me aware msec currently has a Requires on
sendmail-command for caul
On 09.11.2011 22:34, Florian Hubold wrote:
> Am 09.11.2011 20:48, schrieb Michael Scherer:
>> Le mercredi 09 novembre 2011 à 19:38 +0100, Florian Hubold a écrit :
>>> Hi there,
>>>
>>> as Anssi made me aware msec currently has a Requires on
>>> sendmail-command for cauldron, this was the outcome of
Am 09.11.2011 20:48, schrieb Michael Scherer:
Le mercredi 09 novembre 2011 à 19:38 +0100, Florian Hubold a écrit :
Hi there,
as Anssi made me aware msec currently has a Requires on
sendmail-command for cauldron, this was the outcome of the
last discussion about msec / MTA.
However, currently in
Le mercredi 09 novembre 2011 à 19:38 +0100, Florian Hubold a écrit :
> Hi there,
>
> as Anssi made me aware msec currently has a Requires on
> sendmail-command for cauldron, this was the outcome of the
> last discussion about msec / MTA.
> However, currently in /etc/urpmi/prefer.vendor.list postfi
Le mercredi 9 novembre 2011 19:38:07 Florian Hubold a écrit :
> Hi there,
[...]
> However, currently in /etc/urpmi/prefer.vendor.list postfix
> is preferred as sendmail-command and mail-server.
>
> Anssi's vote and mine is to replace preference on postfix
> with dma to ensure users get dma install
Hi there,
as Anssi made me aware msec currently has a Requires on
sendmail-command for cauldron, this was the outcome of the
last discussion about msec / MTA.
However, currently in /etc/urpmi/prefer.vendor.list postfix
is preferred as sendmail-command and mail-server.
Anssi's vote and mine is to
11 matches
Mail list logo