On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 05:45:35AM +0400, Dimitri Jakov wrote:
Yep guys, just forgotten to bump release stupidly (twice! :) Promise
that won't happen anymore :)
You should look at my commit history and grep for the number of SILENT
comments :P
--
Regards,
Olav
On 29.02.2012 00:10, Olav Vitters wrote:
and no need to mention you're bumping the release; if you didn't, the
buildsystem wouldn't allow you to submit
There is one bug. If you are rebuilding, without bumping the release,
when the previous build was for mgaX and the current is for mgaY (where
On 29 February 2012 09:55, Kamil Rytarowski n...@gmx.com wrote:
and no need to mention you're bumping the release; if you didn't, the
buildsystem wouldn't allow you to submit
There is one bug. If you are rebuilding, without bumping the release, when
the previous build was for mgaX and the
On Wed, 29 Feb 2012, Kamil Rytarowski wrote:
On 29.02.2012 00:10, Olav Vitters wrote:
and no need to mention you're bumping the release; if you didn't, the
buildsystem wouldn't allow you to submit
There is one bug. If you are rebuilding, without bumping the release, when
the previous build
On 29.02.2012 11:26, nicolas vigier wrote:
On Wed, 29 Feb 2012, Kamil Rytarowski wrote:
On 29.02.2012 00:10, Olav Vitters wrote:
and no need to mention you're bumping the release; if you didn't, the
buildsystem wouldn't allow you to submit
There is one bug. If you are rebuilding, without
Am 29.02.2012 11:31, schrieb Kamil Rytarowski:
On 29.02.2012 11:26, nicolas vigier wrote:
On Wed, 29 Feb 2012, Kamil Rytarowski wrote:
On 29.02.2012 00:10, Olav Vitters wrote:
and no need to mention you're bumping the release; if you didn't, the
buildsystem wouldn't allow you to submit
On Wed, 29 Feb 2012, Kamil Rytarowski wrote:
On 29.02.2012 11:26, nicolas vigier wrote:
On Wed, 29 Feb 2012, Kamil Rytarowski wrote:
On 29.02.2012 00:10, Olav Vitters wrote:
and no need to mention you're bumping the release; if you didn't, the
buildsystem wouldn't allow you to submit
Am 29.02.2012 11:31, schrieb Kamil Rytarowski:
On 29.02.2012 11:26, nicolas vigier wrote:
On Wed, 29 Feb 2012, Kamil Rytarowski wrote:
On 29.02.2012 00:10, Olav Vitters wrote:
and no need to mention you're bumping the release; if you didn't, the
buildsystem wouldn't allow you to submit
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 10:40, Oliver Burger oliver@googlemail.com wrote:
Am 29.02.2012 11:31, schrieb Kamil Rytarowski:
On 29.02.2012 11:26, nicolas vigier wrote:
On Wed, 29 Feb 2012, Kamil Rytarowski wrote:
On 29.02.2012 00:10, Olav Vitters wrote:
and no need to mention you're
Aand the bug was about what? Please include short (oneliner)
description about the bug next time.
Okay, will do next time. This particular one is about Evolution not
remembering the state of SMTP requires authentication checkbox (always
off). This bug was introduced in Evolution 3.2. For me it
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 09:19:46PM +0100, mitya wrote:
mitya mitya 3.3.90-2.mga2:
+ Revision: 215887
- bump release
- Fix GNOME bug #669294 (will be merged upstream in 3.3.91+)
If you forget to increase the release, you can do something like:
SILENT: bump release
anything with SILENT on the
Op woensdag 29 februari 2012 00:10:47 schreef Olav Vitters:
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 09:19:46PM +0100, mitya wrote:
mitya mitya 3.3.90-2.mga2:
+ Revision: 215887
- bump release
- Fix GNOME bug #669294 (will be merged upstream in 3.3.91+)
If you forget to increase the release, you can do
Yep guys, just forgotten to bump release stupidly (twice! :) Promise
that won't happen anymore :)
Mitya
2012/2/28 mitya buildsystem-dae...@mageia.org:
Name : evolution Relocations: (not relocatable)
Version : 3.3.90 Vendor: Mageia.Org
Release : 2.mga2 Build Date: Tue Feb 28 21:07:48
2012
Install Date: (not
14 matches
Mail list logo