Hello all!
After reading this article:
http://it.slashdot.org/story/13/02/16/2129244/ssh-password-gropers-are-now-trying-high-ports?utm_source=rss1.0mainlinkanonutm_medium=feed
I have been using Blockhosts (http://www.aczoom.com/blockhosts) for many
years now without issue (I also use a
Sounds like a good idea to have something in place out of the box.
PC-BSD, which has SSH server running by default also has DenyHosts
configured and running by default.
--
finid
On 2013-02-19 09:55, Robert Fox wrote:
Hello all!
After reading this article:
Le 19/02/2013 11:06, fi...@linuxbsdos.com a écrit :
Sounds like a good idea to have something in place out of the box.
PC-BSD, which has SSH server running by default also has DenyHosts
configured and running by default.
That's a asysadmin choice, not a packager one. Bloating every machines
If that's how you feel about having a program like DenyHosts running by
default, do you feel the same way about having a firewall running and
configured out of the box.
Is a firewall a sysadmin's or packager's choice?
--
finid
On 2013-02-19 11:03, Guillaume Rousse wrote:
Le 19/02/2013
Le 19/02/2013 12:20, fi...@linuxbsdos.com a écrit :
If that's how you feel about having a program like DenyHosts running by
default, do you feel the same way about having a firewall running and
configured out of the box.
Is a firewall a sysadmin's or packager's choice?
A sysadmin choice.
On Tue, 2013-02-19 at 12:35 +0100, Guillaume Rousse wrote:
Le 19/02/2013 12:20, fi...@linuxbsdos.com a écrit :
If that's how you feel about having a program like DenyHosts running by
default, do you feel the same way about having a firewall running and
configured out of the box.
Is a
'Twas brillig, and Robert Fox at 19/02/13 11:45 did gyre and gimble:
On Tue, 2013-02-19 at 12:35 +0100, Guillaume Rousse wrote:
Le 19/02/2013 12:20, fi...@linuxbsdos.com a écrit :
If that's how you feel about having a program like DenyHosts running by
default, do you feel the same way about
On 2013-02-19 12:13, Colin Guthrie wrote:
'Twas brillig, and Robert Fox at 19/02/13 11:45 did gyre and gimble:
On Tue, 2013-02-19 at 12:35 +0100, Guillaume Rousse wrote:
Le 19/02/2013 12:20, fi...@linuxbsdos.com a écrit :
If that's how you feel about having a program like DenyHosts
running
On 2013-02-19 11:45, Robert Fox wrote:
On Tue, 2013-02-19 at 12:35 +0100, Guillaume Rousse wrote:
Le 19/02/2013 12:20, fi...@linuxbsdos.com a écrit :
If that's how you feel about having a program like DenyHosts
running by
default, do you feel the same way about having a firewall running
'Twas brillig, and fi...@linuxbsdos.com at 19/02/13 12:44 did gyre and
gimble:
On 2013-02-19 12:13, Colin Guthrie wrote:
So overall I'd welcome a default setup that allows things to be more
secure/robust by default (obviously balanced against user experience -
e.g. a *very* secure setup would
On 19/02/13 12:51, fi...@linuxbsdos.com wrote:
On 2013-02-19 11:45, Robert Fox wrote:
On Tue, 2013-02-19 at 12:35 +0100, Guillaume Rousse wrote:
Le 19/02/2013 12:20, fi...@linuxbsdos.com a écrit :
If that's how you feel about having a program like DenyHosts
running by
default, do you
11 matches
Mail list logo
