Re: [Mageia-dev] GNOME 3.2 or 3.4 for Mageia 2?

2011-10-01 Thread Olav Vitters
On Sat, Oct 01, 2011 at 11:02:57AM +0200, Dexter Morgan wrote: > i think 3.4 would be a nice choice ut as told it depends of the > schedule. If you think this can be ok, i trust you. GNOME schedule wise it is ok, I just don't know what things need to be done from a distribution. e.g. iso file siz

Re: [Mageia-dev] GNOME 3.2 or 3.4 for Mageia 2?

2011-10-01 Thread Colin Guthrie
'Twas brillig, and Olav Vitters at 29/09/11 19:28 did gyre and gimble: > On http://mageia.org/wiki/doku.php?id=iso2:technical_specification it > has: > | Number Description Proposed by Comment Bugzilla > | 045.Gnome 3.2x dmorgan > > Found the schedule at > http:/

Re: [Mageia-dev] GNOME 3.2 or 3.4 for Mageia 2?

2011-10-01 Thread D.Morgan
On Sat, Oct 1, 2011 at 5:06 AM, Olav Vitters wrote: > On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 05:52:06PM +0200, Samuel Verschelde wrote: >> Le vendredi 30 septembre 2011 15:00:45, Olav Vitters a écrit : >> > On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 09:33:59PM +0200, Samuel Verschelde wrote: >> > > However, how great is GNOME 3.4

Re: [Mageia-dev] GNOME 3.2 or 3.4 for Mageia 2?

2011-09-30 Thread Olav Vitters
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 05:52:06PM +0200, Samuel Verschelde wrote: > Le vendredi 30 septembre 2011 15:00:45, Olav Vitters a écrit : > > On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 09:33:59PM +0200, Samuel Verschelde wrote: > > > However, how great is GNOME 3.4 going to be as compared to 3.2.2 ? :) > > > > For me it i

Re: [Mageia-dev] GNOME 3.2 or 3.4 for Mageia 2?

2011-09-30 Thread Samuel Verschelde
Le vendredi 30 septembre 2011 15:00:45, Olav Vitters a écrit : > On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 09:33:59PM +0200, Samuel Verschelde wrote: > > However, how great is GNOME 3.4 going to be as compared to 3.2.2 ? :) > > For me it is multiple things: > 1. More stable; The more people use a recent version of

Re: [Mageia-dev] GNOME 3.2 or 3.4 for Mageia 2?

2011-09-30 Thread Olav Vitters
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 09:33:59PM +0200, Samuel Verschelde wrote: > However, how great is GNOME 3.4 going to be as compared to 3.2.2 ? :) For me it is multiple things: 1. More stable; The more people use a recent version of GNOME, more fixes will go into GNOME and long term GNOME is more stabl

Re: [Mageia-dev] GNOME 3.2 or 3.4 for Mageia 2?

2011-09-29 Thread Olav Vitters
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 10:38:18PM +0300, Thomas Backlund wrote: > Olav Vitters skrev 29.9.2011 22:22: > >On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 09:50:57PM +0300, Thomas Backlund wrote: > >>And you can obviously guarantee that the gnome release schedule wont slip... > > > >Guarantee, no, but the combined total nu

Re: [Mageia-dev] GNOME 3.2 or 3.4 for Mageia 2?

2011-09-29 Thread Thomas Backlund
Olav Vitters skrev 29.9.2011 22:54: On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 10:38:18PM +0300, Thomas Backlund wrote: Olav Vitters skrev 29.9.2011 22:22: On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 09:50:57PM +0300, Thomas Backlund wrote: And you can obviously guarantee that the gnome release schedule wont slip... Guarantee, no

Re: [Mageia-dev] GNOME 3.2 or 3.4 for Mageia 2?

2011-09-29 Thread Thomas Backlund
Samuel Verschelde skrev 29.9.2011 22:33: Le jeudi 29 septembre 2011 20:28:33, Olav Vitters a écrit : On http://mageia.org/wiki/doku.php?id=iso2:technical_specification it has: | NumberDescription Proposed by Comment Bugzilla | 045. Gnome 3.2x dmorgan Found the sch

Re: [Mageia-dev] GNOME 3.2 or 3.4 for Mageia 2?

2011-09-29 Thread Thomas Backlund
Thomas Backlund skrev 29.9.2011 22:45: Samuel Verschelde skrev 29.9.2011 22:33: Le jeudi 29 septembre 2011 20:28:33, Olav Vitters a écrit : On http://mageia.org/wiki/doku.php?id=iso2:technical_specification it has: | NumberDescription Proposed by Comment Bugzilla | 045.

Re: [Mageia-dev] GNOME 3.2 or 3.4 for Mageia 2?

2011-09-29 Thread Thomas Backlund
Olav Vitters skrev 29.9.2011 22:22: On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 09:50:57PM +0300, Thomas Backlund wrote: And you can obviously guarantee that the gnome release schedule wont slip... Guarantee, no, but the combined total number of days delayed over the last 5 years or so is probably 1 day. The rele

Re: [Mageia-dev] GNOME 3.2 or 3.4 for Mageia 2?

2011-09-29 Thread Samuel Verschelde
Le jeudi 29 septembre 2011 20:28:33, Olav Vitters a écrit : > On http://mageia.org/wiki/doku.php?id=iso2:technical_specification it > > has: > | Number Description Proposed by Comment Bugzilla > | 045.Gnome 3.2x dmorgan > > Found the schedule at > http://blog.mag

Re: [Mageia-dev] GNOME 3.2 or 3.4 for Mageia 2?

2011-09-29 Thread Olav Vitters
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 09:50:57PM +0300, Thomas Backlund wrote: > And you can obviously guarantee that the gnome release schedule wont slip... Guarantee, no, but the combined total number of days delayed over the last 5 years or so is probably 1 day. The release cycle is *very* stable. I am one

Re: [Mageia-dev] GNOME 3.2 or 3.4 for Mageia 2?

2011-09-29 Thread Thomas Backlund
Olav Vitters skrev 29.9.2011 21:28: On http://mageia.org/wiki/doku.php?id=iso2:technical_specification it has: | NumberDescription Proposed by Comment Bugzilla | 045. Gnome 3.2x dmorgan Found the schedule at http://blog.mageia.org/en/2011/07/17/mageia-2-release-cyc

[Mageia-dev] GNOME 3.2 or 3.4 for Mageia 2?

2011-09-29 Thread Olav Vitters
On http://mageia.org/wiki/doku.php?id=iso2:technical_specification it has: | NumberDescription Proposed by Comment Bugzilla | 045. Gnome 3.2x dmorgan Found the schedule at http://blog.mageia.org/en/2011/07/17/mageia-2-release-cycle-support-and-planning/: Alpha 1