Le 12 octobre 2011 21:24, Rémi Verschelde r...@verschelde.fr a écrit :
2011/10/12 Samuel Verschelde sto...@laposte.net:
Are there other packagers who would be interested in maintaining python
packages within a group ?
Samuel
I would, when I am a packager.
I'm just starting mentorship,
Le mercredi 12 octobre 2011 20:40:51, philippe makowski a écrit :
2011/9/14 Samuel Verschelde sto...@laposte.net:
You may know it or not, many packages have no maintainer.
If I do a mgarepo maintdb get | grep python- | grep nobody | wc -l
I get 148
if nobody stand, may be I can take them
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 11:06:07PM +0200, Samuel Verschelde wrote:
You may know it or not, many packages have no maintainer. This is due to the
fact that we had no maintainer database when we boostrapped the distribution.
Excluding perl packages (a lot of packages, all maintained by jq), we
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 2:33 PM, Sander Lepik sander.le...@eesti.ee wrote:
21.09.2011 22:21, Juan Luis Baptiste kirjutas:
Can you please send again the list of remaining unmaintained packages
? that would make it easier to pick some more.
mgarepo maintdb get |grep nobody
Live list ;)
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 2:19 PM, Samuel Verschelde sto...@laposte.net wrote:
Maintained: 2341
Unmaintained: 3737
Looks like the 2 previous days have not seen much package grabbing, are we all
full ?
Can you please send again the list of remaining unmaintained packages
? that would make it
On 18 September 2011 23:11, Samuel Verschelde sto...@laposte.net wrote:
Yesterday evening: 1993
Today: 2306
Here is the new objective: have more packages with a maintainer than packages
without a maintainer (still excluding perl packages).
I think you shouldn't exclude those
Le lundi 19 septembre 2011 09:30:11, Thierry Vignaud a écrit :
On 18 September 2011 23:11, Samuel Verschelde sto...@laposte.net wrote:
Yesterday evening: 1993
Today: 2306
Here is the new objective: have more packages with a maintainer than
packages without a maintainer (still
On 11/09/19 10:57 +0200, Samuel Verschelde wrote:
Le lundi 19 septembre 2011 09:30:11, Thierry Vignaud a écrit :
On 18 September 2011 23:11, Samuel Verschelde sto...@laposte.net wrote:
Yesterday evening: 1993
Today: 2306
Here is the new objective: have more packages with a maintainer
Le vendredi 16 septembre 2011 22:42:41, Samuel Verschelde a écrit :
Le jeudi 15 septembre 2011 23:13:35, Samuel Verschelde a écrit :
Le mercredi 14 septembre 2011 23:06:07, Samuel Verschelde a écrit :
The objective for the 7 following days is to reach 2000 packages with a
maintainer (not
Le vendredi 16 septembre 2011 à 19:20 +0200, Philippe DIDIER a écrit :
I'm perhaps a little more optimist, thinking that volunteers will catch the
bugs even if they
are not the official maintainer.
But I'm afraid that declaring that a bug catcher becomes a package maintainer
will prevent
2011/9/17 Philippe DIDIER philippedid...@laposte.net:
Funda Wang has done a huge work (not yet finished) to upgrade libpng in
Mageia.
He rebuilt at least hundred source packages to be coherent (and closed bug
reports
of people crying about some programs segfaulting since libpng was upgraded)
Le jeudi 15 septembre 2011 23:13:35, Samuel Verschelde a écrit :
Le mercredi 14 septembre 2011 23:06:07, Samuel Verschelde a écrit :
The objective for the 7 following days is to reach 2000 packages with a
maintainer (not counting perl packages, still). I will send you daily
results.
On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 3:42 PM, Samuel Verschelde sto...@laposte.net wrote:
Now the count is 1919. Let's reach 2000 tomorrow !
Per packager count:
6 juancho
Ohh I didn't knew that packages initially imported didn't had set
their maintainer. I just grabbed mine, so the count
On 14 September 2011 23:06, Samuel Verschelde sto...@laposte.net wrote:
Misc has a proposal to solve this : the next first submitter to an
unmaintained
package will automatically get maintainership for it ! And after some time, if
a package still has no maintainer, it is dropped from the
Le mercredi 14 septembre 2011 23:06:07, Samuel Verschelde a écrit :
The objective for the 7 following days is to reach 2000 packages with a
maintainer (not counting perl packages, still). I will send you daily
results. Deadline is the next packager meeting.
Samuel Verschelde, going to grab
You may know it or not, many packages have no maintainer. This is due to the
fact that we had no maintainer database when we boostrapped the distribution.
Excluding perl packages (a lot of packages, all maintained by jq), we have :
1118 packages with a maintainer
4931 without a maintainer !
16 matches
Mail list logo
