Thomas Backlund skrev 1.12.2012 18:09:
Hi,
as shown with the recent pcre case, we need to be more verbose on
the -dev ml about packages that are WIP and/or known to break bs...
I'm in the process of updating ppl from 0.11.2 to 1.0
(and cloog-ppl to whatever matching version is)
Now, if this
Thomas Backlund wrote:
Thomas Backlund skrev 1.12.2012 18:09:
Hi,
as shown with the recent pcre case, we need to be more verbose on
the -dev ml about packages that are WIP and/or known to break bs...
I'm in the process of updating ppl from 0.11.2 to 1.0
(and cloog-ppl to whatever matching
David Walser skrev 2.12.2012 19:30:
Thomas Backlund wrote:
Thomas Backlund skrev 1.12.2012 18:09:
Hi,
as shown with the recent pcre case, we need to be more verbose on
the -dev ml about packages that are WIP and/or known to break bs...
I'm in the process of updating ppl from 0.11.2 to 1.0
Hi,
as shown with the recent pcre case, we need to be more verbose on
the -dev ml about packages that are WIP and/or known to break bs...
I'm in the process of updating ppl from 0.11.2 to 1.0
(and cloog-ppl to whatever matching version is)
Now, if this package hits the buildsystem mirrors