[root@mainfox rfox]# urpmq ssh
No package named ssh
[root@mainfox rfox]# urpmq sshd
No package named sshd
[root@mainfox rfox]# urpmq kernel
No package named kernel
[root@mainfox rfox]# urpmq kde
No package named kde
Doesn't seem to work anymore . . .
Merry XMas -
R.Fox
26.12.2012 16:33, Robert Fox kirjutas:
[root@mainfox rfox]# urpmq ssh
No package named ssh
[root@mainfox rfox]# urpmq sshd
No package named sshd
[root@mainfox rfox]# urpmq kernel
No package named kernel
[root@mainfox rfox]# urpmq kde
No package named kde
Doesn't seem to work anymore . .
On Wed, Dec 26, 2012 at 3:23 PM, Sander Lepik sander.le...@eesti.ee wrote:
26.12.2012 16:33, Robert Fox kirjutas:
[root@mainfox rfox]# urpmq ssh
No package named ssh
[root@mainfox rfox]# urpmq sshd
No package named sshd
[root@mainfox rfox]# urpmq kernel
No package named kernel
On 12/26/2012 04:29 PM, Pascal Terjan wrote:
I think you have to use urpmq -y ssh
Or --fuzzy if you like the long version.
Yes it seems the default has changed, I noticed it recently...
So do I, I was also wondering why?
In particular, any usage of
urpmq blabla
has now a high probability
On 26 December 2012 22:53, Eatdirt dirt...@gmail.com wrote:
I think you have to use urpmq -y ssh
Or --fuzzy if you like the long version.
Yes it seems the default has changed, I noticed it recently...
So do I, I was also wondering why?
people were complaining there was no exact mode in
Op woensdag 26 december 2012 23:18:22 schreef Thierry Vignaud:
On 26 December 2012 22:53, Eatdirt dirt...@gmail.com wrote:
I think you have to use urpmq -y ssh
Or --fuzzy if you like the long version.
Yes it seems the default has changed, I noticed it recently...
So do I, I was also
On 12/26/2012 11:42 PM, AL13N wrote:
i think this is fine, escpecially considering there's scripts that could use
this, so exact match is much better as default.
there's nothing worse than mistyping and a different package is installed
because it matched...
Ok, but the behaviour and man of
