Le vendredi 5 août 2011 19:05:21, nicolas vigier a écrit :
> On Tue, 26 Jul 2011, Samuel Verschelde wrote:
> > *** Old backports ***
> > Remove old backports when newer ones are submitted
> > - otherwise we let people use old bugged or plagged with security issues
> > packages, when they don't nece
On Tue, 26 Jul 2011, Samuel Verschelde wrote:
>
> *** Old backports ***
> Remove old backports when newer ones are submitted
> - otherwise we let people use old bugged or plagged with security issues
> packages, when they don't necessarily know that there are problems with them
> - simpler cho
on Tue, 26 Jul 2011 17:20
in the Usenet newsgroup gmane.linux.mageia.devel
Samuel Verschelde wrote:
> Le mardi 26 juillet 2011 07:56:36, blind Pete a écrit :
>> on Tue, 26 Jul 2011 08:34
>> in the Usenet newsgroup gmane.linux.mageia.devel
>> Samuel Verschelde wrote:
>>
>> [snip]
>>
>> > *** Old
Samuel Verschelde a écrit :
Le mardi 26 juillet 2011 07:56:36, blind Pete a écrit :
on Tue, 26 Jul 2011 08:34
in the Usenet newsgroup gmane.linux.mageia.devel
Samuel Verschelde wrote:
[snip]
*** Old backports ***
Remove old backports when newer ones are submitted
- otherwise we let people use
Le mardi 26 juillet 2011 07:56:36, blind Pete a écrit :
> on Tue, 26 Jul 2011 08:34
> in the Usenet newsgroup gmane.linux.mageia.devel
> Samuel Verschelde wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
> > *** Old backports ***
> > Remove old backports when newer ones are submitted
> > - otherwise we let people use old bug
on Tue, 26 Jul 2011 08:34
in the Usenet newsgroup gmane.linux.mageia.devel
Samuel Verschelde wrote:
[snip]
> *** Old backports ***
> Remove old backports when newer ones are submitted
> - otherwise we let people use old bugged or plagged with security issues
> packages, when they don't necessar
I have finally taken the time to re-read all the backports discussion and tried
to summarize it. However, as there were various positions expressed during the
discussion and I didn't want to repeat them all (just read the discussion for
that), I chose to build a coherent proposal out of this, ta
