Le 04/01/2012 20:13, Luc Menut a écrit :
Le 04/01/2012 17:20, Guillaume Rousse a écrit :
1) add support for optional README.*.urpmi (%ghost in spec):
This will allow to build this README.*.urpmi at install time in %pre,
%post or %trigger only when it's necessary.
That will create files on the
On 05.01.2012 14:54, Guillaume Rousse wrote:
Le 04/01/2012 20:13, Luc Menut a écrit :
Le 04/01/2012 17:20, Guillaume Rousse a écrit :
1) add support for optional README.*.urpmi (%ghost in spec):
This will allow to build this README.*.urpmi at install time in %pre,
%post or %trigger only when
Hello,
We have recently discussed here about task-obsolete.
http://www.mail-archive.com/mageia-dev@mageia.org/msg09762.html
https://bugs.mageia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3786
I like the idea.
But I think that we need to inform the user about the package(s) that we
will obsolete and remove on his
Le 04/01/2012 16:53, Luc Menut a écrit :
Hello,
We have recently discussed here about task-obsolete.
http://www.mail-archive.com/mageia-dev@mageia.org/msg09762.html
https://bugs.mageia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3786
I like the idea.
But I think that we need to inform the user about the package(s)
On Wednesday 04 January 2012 17:20, Guillaume Rousse wrote:
a subset of them being automatically displayed during installation (ruining
urpmi mass update output).
I have an idea regarding this.
What about storing all those notices in a file during install that one can
review after the
Le 04/01/2012 17:20, Guillaume Rousse a écrit :
1) add support for optional README.*.urpmi (%ghost in spec):
This will allow to build this README.*.urpmi at install time in %pre,
%post or %trigger only when it's necessary.
That will create files on the system unknown from rpm database, and
On 04.01.2012 17:53, Luc Menut wrote:
Hello,
We have recently discussed here about task-obsolete.
http://www.mail-archive.com/mageia-dev@mageia.org/msg09762.html
https://bugs.mageia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3786
I like the idea.
But I think that we need to inform the user about the package(s)
On 04.01.2012 18:20, Guillaume Rousse wrote:
Here are a few proposal of mines to make the situation better:
- use a unique file name, enforced by convention, rather than references
in package description, the same way Debian does with README.debian
- display its content only in graphical
Le 04/01/2012 20:26, Anssi Hannula a écrit :
On 04.01.2012 17:53, Luc Menut wrote:
[...]
1) add support for optional README.*.urpmi (%ghost in spec):
This will allow to build this README.*.urpmi at install time in %pre,
%post or %trigger only when it's necessary.
One use case from the
