On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 09:49:24AM +0100, Romain d'Alverny wrote:
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 02:07, Olivier Thauvin
nanar...@nanardon.zarb.org wrote:
I am supposed to be the maintainers of this software, required by base
of the system:
perl-MDV-Distribconf-4.02-1mdv2010.1.src.rpm
On 17 January 2011 10:44, Michael scherer m...@zarb.org wrote:
As Hoyt points out, it would be more relevant to change the tag
if/when/once this code base grows independantly from the original one.
Well, we can also ( and I think we should ) aim for keeping compatibility,
and in fact, try to
Hi,
I am supposed to be the maintainers of this software, required by base
of the system:
perl-MDV-Distribconf-4.02-1mdv2010.1.src.rpm
perl-MDV-Packdrakeng-1.13-5mdv2010.1.src.rpm
Should we remove the 'MDV' part ?
Notice changing this is not only about the rpm itself, MDV is part of
the
On 1/16/11, Olivier Thauvin nanar...@nanardon.zarb.org wrote:
So I am favor to import it with this name (we didn't rename RPM because
it mean RedHat Package Manager...).
At the risk of being called pedantic, RPM _now_ stands for RPM
Package Manager in all its GNU recursive acronym goodness
