On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 01:51, Michael Scherer m...@zarb.org wrote:
The second check if a binary rpm is missing a source rpm. ( there is
some false positive due to clever trick, like rpmlint-mageia-policy )
So that's likely one for admins for now.
But do not blindly import missing rpms,
On 5 April 2011 11:54, Pascal Terjan pter...@gmail.com wrote:
On the other hand, errors like the one of backuppc may be a error in the
check.
No it's not, it's a noarch package which contains binary, and was
built on x86_64 so is not installable eon i586
# rpm -qp --requires
* Thierry Vignaud (thierry.vign...@gmail.com) wrote:
On 5 April 2011 11:54, Pascal Terjan pter...@gmail.com wrote:
On the other hand, errors like the one of backuppc may be a error in the
check.
No it's not, it's a noarch package which contains binary, and was
built on x86_64 so is not
Le mardi 05 avril 2011 à 14:05 +0200, Thierry Vignaud a écrit :
On 5 April 2011 12:19, Olivier Thauvin nanar...@nanardon.zarb.org wrote:
Then we should block upload of packages with the following rpmlint error:
arch-independent-package-contains-binary-or-object
Take care to not block
Hi
for those who were packagers at Mandriva ( or PLF ), we used to have a
website showing result of various check, called youri-check :
http://youri.zarb.org/demo/mandriva/
Pascal completed the installation of our own instance of youri on
http://check.mageia.org/ yesterday.
For now, that's
