On 17 March 2011 22:38, Remy CLOUARD wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 02:26:53PM +0100, Michael Scherer wrote:
>> Le vendredi 11 mars 2011 à 16:45 +0100, Remy CLOUARD a écrit :
>>
>> > Ok, so let’s drop firefox too, install epiphany and konqueror instead.
>> > (maybe those are already installed as
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 02:26:53PM +0100, Michael Scherer wrote:
> Le vendredi 11 mars 2011 à 16:45 +0100, Remy CLOUARD a écrit :
>
> > Ok, so let’s drop firefox too, install epiphany and konqueror instead.
> > (maybe those are already installed aside firefox ?)
>
> I do use epiphany and konquero
Quote: Maurice Batey wrote on Tue, 15 March 2011 18:54
> On Tue, 15 Mar 2011 16:37:13 +0100, Tux99 wrote:
>
> > so we are 2 in favor of dropping firefox.
> >
> > Now that would help a lot to get Mageia great reviews..
>
> I do hope you're
On Tue, 15 Mar 2011 16:37:13 +0100, Tux99 wrote:
> so we are 2 in favor of dropping firefox.
>
> Now that would help a lot to get Mageia great reviews..
I do hope you're joking...
--
/\/\aurice
(Retired in Surrey, UK) Registered Linux User #487649
Linux Mandriva 2010.2
Quote: Michael Scherer wrote on Tue, 15 March 2011 14:26
> Good, so we are 2 in favor of dropping firefox.
Now that would help a lot to get Mageia great reviews...
--
Mageia ML Forum Gateway: http://mageia.linuxtech.net/forum/
Le vendredi 11 mars 2011 à 16:45 +0100, Remy CLOUARD a écrit :
> Ok, so let’s drop firefox too, install epiphany and konqueror instead.
> (maybe those are already installed aside firefox ?)
I do use epiphany and konqueror ( when i was under kde ).
> If we follow one way, let’s be consistent with
On 3/11/11, Pierre Jarillon wrote:
>
> A user does not want a player X or Y, we need only a player which works in
> any case without any trouble.
>
Agreed. Part of the enjoyment of Linux is exploring the many, many
options for any application.
A novice will be happy with an app that "just works
Le vendredi 11 mars 2011 00:41:42, Ahmad Samir a écrit :
> IMHO, we should stick with dragon, it's a "simple" player usable for
> average users; also there's a good chance upstream will switch to
> phonon-vlc (or Mageia may switch to phonon-vlc when it stabilises
> more), so the best of both worlds
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 12:44:22AM +0100, Michael Scherer wrote:
> Le jeudi 10 mars 2011 à 23:38 +0100, JA Magallón a écrit :
> > On Thu, 10 Mar 2011 23:10:59 +0100, Rémi Verschelde
> > wrote:
> >
> > > When you say "media" player, does it concern stricty video playing or
> > > should the defaul
Le jeudi 10 mars 2011 à 23:38 +0100, JA Magallón a écrit :
> On Thu, 10 Mar 2011 23:10:59 +0100, Rémi Verschelde
> wrote:
>
> > When you say "media" player, does it concern stricty video playing or
> > should the default media player be suitable for both video and audio?
> > Personally I like to
IMHO, we should stick with dragon, it's a "simple" player usable for
average users; also there's a good chance upstream will switch to
phonon-vlc (or Mageia may switch to phonon-vlc when it stabilises
more), so the best of both worlds :)
(at such time it'll be easier to just add vlc main package as
Quote: jamagallon wrote on Thu, 10 March 2011 23:38
> All desktops have their own 'standard' or 'official' media players.
> I will talk about gnome, you can translate it to kde, for which I have
> no idea of which will be the equivalents.
The 'offical' DE players are not necessarily the best ch
On Thu, 10 Mar 2011 23:10:59 +0100, Rémi Verschelde
wrote:
> When you say "media" player, does it concern stricty video playing or
> should the default media player be suitable for both video and audio?
> Personally I like to keep these two separated, I feel that a
> specialised player will best
When you say "media" player, does it concern stricty video playing or
should the default media player be suitable for both video and audio?
Personally I like to keep these two separated, I feel that a
specialised player will best fulfil its purpose than a multimedia
player like Windows Media Player
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 09:17:28AM +0100, Dimitrios Glentadakis wrote:
> 2011/3/10 Oliver Burger
>
> > There was already a discussion about that in the alpha2 iso thread but I
> > think
> > it's better to discuss this in a thread of its own.
> >
> > Most people "voted" for smplayer in the other t
On 10 March 2011 08:41, Michael Scherer wrote:
> Le jeudi 10 mars 2011 à 08:55 +0100, Oliver Burger a écrit :
>> There was already a discussion about that in the alpha2 iso thread but I
>> think
>> it's better to discuss this in a thread of its own.
>>
>> Most people "voted" for smplayer in the o
Le jeudi 10 mars 2011 à 08:55 +0100, Oliver Burger a écrit :
> There was already a discussion about that in the alpha2 iso thread but I
> think
> it's better to discuss this in a thread of its own.
>
> Most people "voted" for smplayer in the other thread, which would be fine
> with
> me. It's
2011/3/10 Oliver Burger
> There was already a discussion about that in the alpha2 iso thread but I
> think
> it's better to discuss this in a thread of its own.
>
> Most people "voted" for smplayer in the other thread, which would be fine
> with
> me. It's qt based (nothing against gtk, but using
There was already a discussion about that in the alpha2 iso thread but I think
it's better to discuss this in a thread of its own.
Most people "voted" for smplayer in the other thread, which would be fine with
me. It's qt based (nothing against gtk, but using a gtk based application as
default
19 matches
Mail list logo
