Re: [Mageia-dev] maintainer groups

2010-10-25 Thread andre999
Ahmad Samir a écrit : On 25 October 2010 19:44, Michael Scherer wrote: Le lundi 25 octobre 2010 à 19:29 +0200, Luca Berra a écrit : this is a suggestion i already made with mandriva but it landed nowhere, let's try again. At the moment we have 1to1 relationship in all tools between

Re: [Mageia-dev] maintainer groups

2010-10-25 Thread Maarten Vanraes
Op maandag 25 oktober 2010 19:29:18 schreef Luca Berra: > this is a suggestion i already made with mandriva but it landed nowhere, > let's try again. > > At the moment we have 1to1 relationship in all tools between maintainer > and package. But for some packages we have more than one people willin

Re: [Mageia-dev] maintainer groups

2010-10-25 Thread Ahmad Samir
On 25 October 2010 19:44, Michael Scherer wrote: > Le lundi 25 octobre 2010 à 19:29 +0200, Luca Berra a écrit : >> this is a suggestion i already made with mandriva but it landed nowhere, >> let's try again. >> >> At the moment we have 1to1 relationship in all tools between maintainer >> and packa

Re: [Mageia-dev] maintainer groups

2010-10-25 Thread Luca Berra
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 07:44:19PM +0200, Michael Scherer wrote: Le lundi 25 octobre 2010 à 19:29 +0200, Luca Berra a écrit : this would result that in case a ticket is opened in bugzilla vs package, all interested parties would be notified, and start working on a solution. (this might require a

Re: [Mageia-dev] maintainer groups

2010-10-25 Thread Michael Scherer
Le lundi 25 octobre 2010 à 19:29 +0200, Luca Berra a écrit : > this is a suggestion i already made with mandriva but it landed nowhere, > let's try again. > > At the moment we have 1to1 relationship in all tools between maintainer > and package. But for some packages we have more than one people w

[Mageia-dev] maintainer groups

2010-10-25 Thread Luca Berra
this is a suggestion i already made with mandriva but it landed nowhere, let's try again. At the moment we have 1to1 relationship in all tools between maintainer and package. But for some packages we have more than one people willing to work on that package. Besides, for some critical package it