On 20/11/11 05:29, Juan Luis Baptiste wrote:
Yesterday I updated oxygen-gtk to 1.1.5 and the changelog mentions
some bug fixes and rendering improvements for libreoffice, firefox,
and google-chrome, give it a try and let us know how it behaves.
Hi there,
it is indeed faster and behaves well on
On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 3:52 PM, eatdirt wrote:
>
> I am concerned about this because already on my 4 years old machine, the
> oxygen-gtk menu are slightly slower than the basic gtk. So I am pretty sure
> people with old machines won't be happy to have nice rounded blue slow
> menus.
>
Yesterday
eatdirt a écrit :
On 18/11/11 15:34, John Balcaen wrote:
I tried to remove it the hard way, rpm -e --nodep, and all my gtk
windows
work good. So, are you sure about this? Maybe if not found, there is a
default behaviour.
Probably because you already switch from oxygen-gtk to another style.
On 18/11/11 15:34, John Balcaen wrote:
I tried to remove it the hard way, rpm -e --nodep, and all my gtk windows
work good. So, are you sure about this? Maybe if not found, there is a
default behaviour.
Probably because you already switch from oxygen-gtk to another style.
So gtk apps are alre
2011/11/18 EatDirt :
> On 18/11/11 11:41, Funda Wang wrote:
>>
>> It is wanted, because we default to oxygen gtk-style, which is hardcoded
>> in gtk's configuration files and source code.
>
> Hi Funda
> I tried to remove it the hard way, rpm -e --nodep, and all my gtk windows
> work good. So, are y
On 18/11/11 11:41, Funda Wang wrote:
It is wanted, because we default to oxygen gtk-style, which is hardcoded
in gtk's configuration files and source code.
Hi Funda
I tried to remove it the hard way, rpm -e --nodep, and all my gtk
windows work good. So, are you sure about this? Maybe if not fo
It is wanted, because we default to oxygen gtk-style, which is hardcoded in
gtk's configuration files and source code.
在 2011-11-18 下午3:52，"eatdirt" 写道：
> Hi,
> trying to remove oxygen-gtk triggers the removal of 300 packages because
> it seems to be required by gtk+2.0.
>
> I don't think it is th
Hi,
trying to remove oxygen-gtk triggers the removal of 300 packages because
it seems to be required by gtk+2.0.
I don't think it is the case, shall I open a bug report if true?
Cheers,
Chris.
