On 11 June 2011 23:52, Pascal Terjan pter...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for helping but
1) Please use a better changelog message, like Rebuild for perl
5.14. Increase rel for rebuild is not interesting when looking at the
history of a package.
we should really reject one word commit messages, at
On 11/06/12 16:02 -0700, Thomas Spuhler wrote:
I am not a perl guru. I agreed with sander85 to start at the end so we don't
both work on the same packages.
thanks for your help!
I used this list: http://pkgsubmit.mageia.org/data/src.txt
the list to use is:
$ urpmf --requires :perlapi-5.12
On Saturday, June 11, 2011 02:52:43 pm Pascal Terjan wrote:
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 17:00, Thomas Spuhler tho...@btspuhler.com wrote:
On Saturday, June 11, 2011 03:33:18 am Olivier Blin wrote:
Jerome Quelin jque...@gmail.com writes:
hi,
perl 5.14.0 should arrive soon. it compiles
Jerome Quelin jque...@gmail.com writes:
hi,
perl 5.14.0 should arrive soon. it compiles fine on both i586 x86_64,
and it seem we fixed the only problem arisen in perl-URPM.
since other packages need to be rebuilt in the same loop, and given that
urpmi is written in perl, it needs a
On Saturday, June 11, 2011 03:33:18 am Olivier Blin wrote:
Jerome Quelin jque...@gmail.com writes:
hi,
perl 5.14.0 should arrive soon. it compiles fine on both i586 x86_64,
and it seem we fixed the only problem arisen in perl-URPM.
since other packages need to be rebuilt in the
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 17:00, Thomas Spuhler tho...@btspuhler.com wrote:
On Saturday, June 11, 2011 03:33:18 am Olivier Blin wrote:
Jerome Quelin jque...@gmail.com writes:
hi,
perl 5.14.0 should arrive soon. it compiles fine on both i586 x86_64,
and it seem we fixed the only problem
