'Twas brillig, and eatdirt at 25/02/12 16:13 did gyre and gimble:
Hi people,
xinit has no maintainer, I am happy to do so but the spec is a bit scary
as it has a lot of patches, some quite old and maybe no longer needed?
I have just upgraded it to the latest keeping (and fixing) all orignal
On 27/02/12 12:17, Colin Guthrie wrote:
I don't think it's a problem and the commit looks good to me. I wouldn't
have changed the %patch0 line, but that's just a very minor comment.
Cool, thanks!
Ah ok, you mean the suffix?
I though it was a bit unclear as the file itself is called startx.
Hi people,
xinit has no maintainer, I am happy to do so but the spec is a bit scary
as it has a lot of patches, some quite old and maybe no longer needed?
I have just upgraded it to the latest keeping (and fixing) all orignal
patches; please if you have a request of warning, make a comment
