Re: [Mageia-dev] Updates testing

2011-07-08 Thread Samuel Verschelde
Le vendredi 8 juillet 2011 06:22:38, Ahmad Samir a écrit : On 7 July 2011 22:04, philippe makowski makowski.mag...@gmail.com wrote: 2011/7/7 nicolas vigier bo...@mars-attacks.org: Yes, for the test about the bug fixed. But isn't there tests to check for regressions ? when you push a

Re: [Mageia-dev] Updates testing

2011-07-08 Thread David W. Hodgins
On Fri, 08 Jul 2011 00:22:38 -0400, Ahmad Samir ahmadsamir3...@gmail.com wrote: IMHO, for big packages like libreoffice, we'll have to rely on the free-cost-daily-usage QA, i.e. pushing it to Cauldron users for 1-2month, and waiting till the dust settles before pushing to older stable

Re: [Mageia-dev] Updates testing

2011-07-08 Thread Samuel Verschelde
Le vendredi 8 juillet 2011 10:20:16, Samuel Verschelde a écrit : Le vendredi 8 juillet 2011 06:22:38, Ahmad Samir a écrit : On 7 July 2011 22:04, philippe makowski makowski.mag...@gmail.com wrote: 2011/7/7 nicolas vigier bo...@mars-attacks.org: Yes, for the test about the bug fixed. But

Re: [Mageia-dev] Updates testing

2011-07-08 Thread nicolas vigier
On Thu, 07 Jul 2011, andre999 wrote: nicolas vigier a écrit : On Thu, 07 Jul 2011, Damien Lallement wrote: Le 07/07/2011 14:18, nicolas vigier a écrit : On Wed, 06 Jul 2011, José Jorge wrote: Le mercredi 6 juillet 2011 18:12:44, nicolas vigier a écrit : Hello, A few package updates need

Re: [Mageia-dev] Updates testing

2011-07-08 Thread philippe makowski
2011/7/8 nicolas vigier bo...@mars-attacks.org: I think the goal is not to do full regression tests, as we don't have time for this. But do minimal testing, in 1 or 2 minutes, to check that basic functionality is still working, to check that the update didn't break everything. For LibreOffice

Re: [Mageia-dev] Updates testing

2011-07-08 Thread andre999
philippe makowski a écrit : 2011/7/8 nicolas vigierbo...@mars-attacks.org: I think the goal is not to do full regression tests, as we don't have time for this. But do minimal testing, in 1 or 2 minutes, to check that basic functionality is still working, to check that the update didn't break

Re: [Mageia-dev] Updates testing

2011-07-07 Thread nicolas vigier
On Wed, 06 Jul 2011, José Jorge wrote: Le mercredi 6 juillet 2011 18:12:44, nicolas vigier a écrit : Hello, A few package updates need testing on x86_64 (they have been tested on i586, thanks to Dave Hodgins) : https://bugs.mageia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1944

Re: [Mageia-dev] Updates testing

2011-07-07 Thread Damien Lallement
Le 07/07/2011 14:18, nicolas vigier a écrit : On Wed, 06 Jul 2011, José Jorge wrote: Le mercredi 6 juillet 2011 18:12:44, nicolas vigier a écrit : Hello, A few package updates need testing on x86_64 (they have been tested on i586, thanks to Dave Hodgins) :

Re: [Mageia-dev] Updates testing

2011-07-07 Thread nicolas vigier
On Thu, 07 Jul 2011, Damien Lallement wrote: Le 07/07/2011 14:18, nicolas vigier a écrit : On Wed, 06 Jul 2011, José Jorge wrote: Le mercredi 6 juillet 2011 18:12:44, nicolas vigier a écrit : Hello, A few package updates need testing on x86_64 (they have been tested on i586, thanks to

Re: [Mageia-dev] Updates testing

2011-07-07 Thread philippe makowski
2011/7/7 nicolas vigier bo...@mars-attacks.org: Yes, for the test about the bug fixed. But isn't there tests to check for regressions ? when you push a new minor version (only bugfix) for softwares like LibreOffice, Postgresql or Firebird for example, will the Mageia QA team run tests for

Re: [Mageia-dev] Updates testing

2011-07-07 Thread Stew Benedict
On 07/07/2011 07:38 PM, andre999 wrote: All tested, but without a testcase, some are hard to test. Yes, testcase need to be done for each package. Maybe we could have a wiki page to save all test cases, and use them when the same package is updated again ? No need to put this on the wiki

Re: [Mageia-dev] Updates testing

2011-07-07 Thread Eugeni Dodonov
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 21:01, Stew Benedict stewbi...@gmail.com wrote: There once was a project at Mandriva where each packager was to supposed to come up with a basic functionality test for his/her package(s), although I don't think it got much traction aside from those of us who were getting

Re: [Mageia-dev] Updates testing

2011-07-07 Thread andre999
Stew Benedict a écrit : On 07/07/2011 07:38 PM, andre999 wrote: All tested, but without a testcase, some are hard to test. Yes, testcase need to be done for each package. Maybe we could have a wiki page to save all test cases, and use them when the same package is updated again ? No need to

Re: [Mageia-dev] Updates testing

2011-07-07 Thread Ahmad Samir
On 7 July 2011 22:04, philippe makowski makowski.mag...@gmail.com wrote: 2011/7/7 nicolas vigier bo...@mars-attacks.org: Yes, for the test about the bug fixed. But isn't there tests to check for regressions ? when you push a new minor version (only bugfix) for softwares like LibreOffice,

Re: [Mageia-dev] Updates testing

2011-07-06 Thread Wolfgang Bornath
2011/7/6 nicolas vigier bo...@mars-attacks.org: Hello, A few package updates need testing on x86_64 (they have been tested on i586, thanks to Dave Hodgins) : https://bugs.mageia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1944 Successfully tested on Mageia 1 x86_64 (reported also in the bug report) -- wobo

Re: [Mageia-dev] Updates testing

2011-07-06 Thread José Jorge
Le mercredi 6 juillet 2011 18:12:44, nicolas vigier a écrit : Hello, A few package updates need testing on x86_64 (they have been tested on i586, thanks to Dave Hodgins) : https://bugs.mageia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1944 https://bugs.mageia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1485