On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 06:15:52PM +0100, philippe makowski wrote:
Hi,
I though that I can find more time to work on this week end, but
unfortunately it was not the case.
The Mandriva doc is really not a good starter
(http://wiki.mandriva.com/en/Python_packaging_policy)
That's just a
On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 12:32:24PM +0100, Samuel Verschelde wrote:
Le dimanche 16 janvier 2011 11:26:54, Angelo Naselli a écrit :
In data domenica 16 gennaio 2011 00:07:56, Anssi Hannula ha scritto:
Hi all!
Should we have a %mdkversion (and %mdkver/%mdvver) that is hardcoded to
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 09:49:24AM +0100, Romain d'Alverny wrote:
On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 02:07, Olivier Thauvin
nanar...@nanardon.zarb.org wrote:
I am supposed to be the maintainers of this software, required by base
of the system:
perl-MDV-Distribconf-4.02-1mdv2010.1.src.rpm
On 17 January 2011 10:44, Michael scherer m...@zarb.org wrote:
As Hoyt points out, it would be more relevant to change the tag
if/when/once this code base grows independantly from the original one.
Well, we can also ( and I think we should ) aim for keeping compatibility,
and in fact, try to
Le samedi 15 janvier 2011 à 11:08 +0100, Remy CLOUARD a écrit :
Patches must be named in a very explicit manner to make it very clear to
what version it was originally applied. To that end, a patch needs to
follow the convention of
[package_name]-[version]-[description].patch:
*
On 27 September 2010 18:17, Robert Xu rob...@gmail.com wrote:
Now, I don't know how Mandriva did its build system, but we will
ALWAYS need physical access to servers. If something goes so terribly
wrong that one has to reinstall the whole freaking OS, that's not
going to help Magiea unless we
'Twas brillig, and Michael scherer at 17/01/11 08:40 did gyre and gimble:
On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 12:32:24PM +0100, Samuel Verschelde wrote:
Le dimanche 16 janvier 2011 11:26:54, Angelo Naselli a écrit :
In data domenica 16 gennaio 2011 00:07:56, Anssi Hannula ha scritto:
Hi all!
Should we
On 17 January 2011 16:58, Colin Guthrie mag...@colin.guthr.ie wrote:
Given the fact that rpm5 is drifting away from the usage of %mkrel for using
%distepoch,
I truly doubt this will happen.
I think the mkrels will stay for a while tho' (for ease of backporting)
so I think we'll have some
Op maandag 17 januari 2011 18:23:55 schreef Thierry Vignaud:
On 17 January 2011 16:58, Colin Guthrie mag...@colin.guthr.ie wrote:
Given the fact that rpm5 is drifting away from the usage of %mkrel for
using %distepoch, I truly doubt this will happen.
I think the mkrels will stay for a
2011/1/17 Michael scherer m...@zarb.org:
On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 06:15:52PM +0100, philippe makowski wrote:
Hi,
I though that I can find more time to work on this week end, but
unfortunately it was not the case.
The Mandriva doc is really not a good starter
Am 13.01.2011 20:52, schrieb Michael Scherer:
Le jeudi 13 janvier 2011 à 20:21 +0100, Marcello Anni a écrit :
and what's better than bittorrent protocol to use user
available bandwith to do this? i would like to know:
And I do know that bittorrent was said to overload the routing
Am 15.01.2011 11:08, schrieb Remy CLOUARD:
http://mageia.org/wiki/doku.php?id=spec_syntax
Please review this page as it’s one of the most important one for the
beginning of the mentoring process, with the RPM Howto page (yet to be
imported).
I have one comment, or more of a question: Why is
'Twas brillig, and Florian Hubold at 17/01/11 21:53 did gyre and gimble:
Am 15.01.2011 11:08, schrieb Remy CLOUARD:
http://mageia.org/wiki/doku.php?id=spec_syntax
Please review this page as it’s one of the most important one for the
beginning of the mentoring process, with the RPM Howto page
2011/1/17 Florian Hubold doktor5...@arcor.de:
Am 15.01.2011 11:08, schrieb Remy CLOUARD:
http://mageia.org/wiki/doku.php?id=spec_syntax
Please review this page as it’s one of the most important one for the
beginning of the mentoring process, with the RPM Howto page (yet to be
imported).
I
2011/1/12 Marcello Anni marcello.a...@alice.it:
Thanks Olivier, for saying this much better than I could
wobo, yet another mirror maintainer
yes wobo, but except Per Øyvind no one has really answered to my question...
PS: you should really look into the research papers pointed to before
even
Le lundi 17 janvier 2011 à 21:03 +0100, philippe makowski a écrit :
2011/1/17 Michael scherer m...@zarb.org:
On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 06:15:52PM +0100, philippe makowski wrote:
Hi,
I though that I can find more time to work on this week end, but
unfortunately it was not the case.
The
On Monday, January 17, 2011 11:45:24 am Maarten Vanraes wrote:
Op maandag 17 januari 2011 18:23:55 schreef Thierry Vignaud:
On 17 January 2011 16:58, Colin Guthrie mag...@colin.guthr.ie wrote:
Given the fact that rpm5 is drifting away from the usage of %mkrel for
using %distepoch, I truly
Op dinsdag 18 januari 2011 02:07:32 schreef Thomas Spuhler:
On Monday, January 17, 2011 11:45:24 am Maarten Vanraes wrote:
Op maandag 17 januari 2011 18:23:55 schreef Thierry Vignaud:
On 17 January 2011 16:58, Colin Guthrie mag...@colin.guthr.ie wrote:
Given the fact that rpm5 is
However I feel that
4) It is reasonable for downloaders to use multiple connexions per
mirror, as long as they don't bypass the controls put in place by the
mirror. Not only reasonable, but actually desirable in terms of using
otherwise unused download capacity that occurs from time to
2011/1/18 Michael Scherer m...@zarb.org:
We can merge part of their policy , I am not against it, I just think we
should not adopt everything :)
Fine
So I'll try to
Hi
Could we set up a mailing list for new uploaded RPMs like we had in Mandriva?
See you
21 matches
Mail list logo
