Re: 0.1

2008-09-12 Thread Robin Anil
I need to do the much needed process flow diagram and description for the Classifier. Hoping to finish it off this weekend. -- Robin Anil Blog: http://techdigger.wordpress.com -- On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 8:27 PM, Sean Owen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Cool by me. I have made all my major

Re: 0.1

2008-09-12 Thread Grant Ingersoll
+1. On Sep 12, 2008, at 10:57 AM, Sean Owen wrote: Cool by me. I have made all my major refactorings I wanted to do before Mahout 0.1, and have had some time to fix bugs and documentation, etc. I am fine with a freeze Monday and ready for release. There's sure more work to do, but my piece is q

Re: 0.1

2008-09-12 Thread Sean Owen
Cool by me. I have made all my major refactorings I wanted to do before Mahout 0.1, and have had some time to fix bugs and documentation, etc. I am fine with a freeze Monday and ready for release. There's sure more work to do, but my piece is quite fine for "0.1". On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 3:45 PM,

Re: LUCENE-1039

2008-09-12 Thread Karl Wettin
I honestly don't know, that's why I'm posting ;) It sort of fits Lucene more given the matrix and the fact it is a non scaling implementation, but on the other hand Mahout is a subproject of Lucene.. karl 12 sep 2008 kl. 08.25 skrev Ted Dunning: Sounds good to me. (until I looked a

Re: LUCENE-1039

2008-09-12 Thread Grant Ingersoll
You might see how it fits in w/ the existing (C)NB stuff. I started w/ Toby's approach for that, but I know Robin took it several steps beyond. On Sep 12, 2008, at 2:25 AM, Ted Dunning wrote: Sounds good to me. (until I looked at who sent the email, I was about to say we should ask Karl