Hi all, I started converting my stuff to Hadoop 0.20, since a lot was
deprecated in the mapreduce portion.
For what it's worth, attached is the fruit of a couple hours of
research on how to translate into new APIs. Maybe it helps.
I have not verified it works. Once I get it working, others can
co
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-122?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12728034#action_12728034
]
Deneche A. Hakim commented on MAHOUT-122:
-
I forgot to mention that I used Kdd50% i
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-122?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Deneche A. Hakim updated MAHOUT-122:
Attachment: refimp_Jul7.diff
I did some tests on the "poker hand" dataset from UCI, it cont
Are you referring to MAHOUT-143?
On Jul 7, 2009, at 7:07 AM, Sean Owen wrote:
Hi all, I started converting my stuff to Hadoop 0.20, since a lot was
deprecated in the mapreduce portion.
For what it's worth, attached is the fruit of a couple hours of
research on how to translate into new APIs. M
Oh I guess I am, now that I looked at the issue list (MAHOUT-142 right?)
So far I am just migrating "my" stuff (o.a.m.cf.taste) since I know it
and wanted to share some intermediate result.
On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 12:43 PM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
> Are you referring to MAHOUT-143?
I had tried to port my code to .mapreduce.* library. There are a lot of
helper classes which was developed for mapred.* library which is still not
there for the new API. I went as fast as completely modifying driver mapper
reducer only to find out the MultipleFileOutputFormat (splitting Reduce
outp
Hi,I have gone as far as i can in testing Bayes Code using
20Newsgroups. It would be great if we can test the code
over Wikipedia dump. But my laptop is no match for it :). If any test
cluster is available for mahout developers, i would certainly like to get my
hands on it for some
David Hall (JIRA) wrote:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-123?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
David Hall updated MAHOUT-123:
--
Attachment: MAHOUT-123.patch
Tests included, wiki page is created
I downlo
There is a new name for something very similar (which I now forget).
On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 5:43 AM, Robin Anil wrote:
> I had tried to port my code to .mapreduce.* library. There are a lot of
> helper classes which was developed for mapred.* library which is still not
> there for the new API. I
The students mid-term survey is available online. I'm posting this because I
almost forgot it =P
--- En date de : Mer 17.6.09, Grant Ingersoll a écrit :
> De: Grant Ingersoll
> Objet: [GSOC] July 6 is mid-term evaluations
> À: mahout-dev@lucene.apache.org
> Date: Mercredi 17 Juin 2009, 15h54
My bad. Once I ran mvn install the 1.2 version was downloaded into my
repository. I should have noticed the pom was modified by the patch.
David Hall wrote:
On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 8:04 AM, Jeff Eastman wrote:
David Hall (JIRA) wrote:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT
On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 8:04 AM, Jeff Eastman wrote:
> David Hall (JIRA) wrote:
>>
>> [
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-123?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
>> ]
>>
>> David Hall updated MAHOUT-123:
>> --
>>
>> Attac
I filled out one for Deneche.
On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 9:32 AM, deneche abdelhakim wrote:
>
> The students mid-term survey is available online. I'm posting this because
> I almost forgot it =P
>
> --- En date de : Mer 17.6.09, Grant Ingersoll a
> écrit :
>
> > De: Grant Ingersoll
> > Objet: [GSOC
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-124?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12728311#action_12728311
]
Isabel Drost commented on MAHOUT-124:
-
Some initial comments on the patch:
org/apache/
On Tuesday 07 July 2009 20:34:09 Ted Dunning wrote:
> I filled out one for Deneche.
I submitted the one for Robin yesterday evening.
Isabel
--
QOTD: Produtos desenvolvidos para todo tipo de idiota * Impresso no fundo,
embaixo, de uma sobremesa tiramisudo Tesco: ``N�o vire de ponta cabe�a.''
On Tuesday 07 July 2009 15:50:05 Robin Anil wrote:
> If any test cluster is available for mahout developers, i would certainly
> like to get my hands on it for some time. So would others on the list.
Committers do get credits for Amazon EC2 - however I wonder whether there is
anything we can do f
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-124?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12728325#action_12728325
]
stack commented on MAHOUT-124:
--
Here's a few small comments Robin:
In HybridCache, you import
In CXF and XMLSchema, we use both checkstyle and eclipse to enforce
coding style and standards. There is technology to run this stuff from
maven and to cause the maven-eclipse-plugin to configure it into
eclipse.
There's no telling if the exact set of style rules in use there will
seem attractive
I am for it. I think most people are here too. The problem is, as
ever, which standards to choose. Maybe we can figure out where there
is agreement, enforce that, and not sweat smaller stuff (or add it
over time).
For example I might suggest we bother drawing up guidelines on:
- Line length (max
I could help knock down some of these. With IntelliJ it goes pretty
quickly.
On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 1:14 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
> The first time this is tried, it will call forth a big raft of picky
> complaints.
>
I could make a patch that has the checkstyle and PMD stuff in an
optional profile. You could apply it and see what you think of the
results.
On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 4:58 PM, Ted Dunning wrote:
> I could help knock down some of these. With IntelliJ it goes pretty
> quickly.
>
> On Tue, Jul 7, 2009
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-65?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12728466#action_12728466
]
M. Arshad Khan commented on MAHOUT-65:
--
The patch seems to work for me. However, I get
On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 2:04 AM, Sean Owen wrote:
> I am for it. I think most people are here too. The problem is, as
> ever, which standards to choose. Maybe we can figure out where there
> is agreement, enforce that, and not sweat smaller stuff (or add it
> over time).
>
> For example I might su
23 matches
Mail list logo
