yes its meant to be run twice, one time selecting the training samples
and the next time the testing samples. It assumes that RNG will return
the exact same numbers twice.
On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 1:54 PM, Sean Owen wrote:
> I rolled it back. So the reader depends on the seed and the exact
> behav
I rolled it back. So the reader depends on the seed and the exact
behavior of the RNG? I have no doubt it is needed if intended, just
checking that it's intended.
(I also fixed build-reuters.sh)
On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 1:55 PM, Sean Owen wrote:
> Sorry I will investigate when back at my workstat
On Fri, 18 Sep 2009 08:19:48 -0700
Grant Ingersoll wrote:
> I usually just kick 'em off and go fill in docs or do something else.
Like answering questions on the mailing list ;)
Cheers,
Isabel
On Fri, 18 Sep 2009 07:28:47 -0700
Grant Ingersoll wrote:
> Is it possible to setup the tests to run in parallel? I know Ant
> has this option. This could speed things up.
That sounds like an interesting option.
> As for integration vs units. Are you suggesting then, that most of
> the ti
