[jira] Updated: (MAHOUT-153) Implement kmeans++ for initial cluster selection in kmeans

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-153?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Pallavi Palleti updated MAHOUT-153: --- Attachment: Mahout-153.patch Removed making lengthSquared instance variable to transient. Use

Re: [jira] Commented: (MAHOUT-337) Don't serialize cached length squared in JSON vector representation

Hi Sean, I have used equivalent() in all the places and this worked perfectly fine with me. Yes. As Jake said, probably this needs a documentation rather a bug. Thanks Pallavi On 03/16/2010 02:17 AM, Jake Mannix (JIRA) wrote: [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-337?page=com.

Re: [DISCUSS] Mahout TLP Board Resolution

close, actually: عبد الحكيم =D On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 6:41 PM, Benson Margulies wrote: > Or perhaps: > > عبدل حكيم > > ? > > > On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 1:34 PM, deneche abdelhakim > wrote: >> should be "Abdelhakim Deneche <...>" cause my first name is 'Abdelhakim >> >> On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 a

[jira] Commented: (MAHOUT-338) Simplify maven structure

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-338?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12847198#action_12847198 ] Benson Margulies commented on MAHOUT-338: - Progress: there is a distribution dir. T

[jira] Commented: (MAHOUT-338) Simplify maven structure

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-338?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12847197#action_12847197 ] Benson Margulies commented on MAHOUT-338: - revision 925075. > Simplify maven stru

[jira] Commented: (MAHOUT-338) Simplify maven structure

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-338?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12847192#action_12847192 ] Benson Margulies commented on MAHOUT-338: - revisions: 925070, 925071 > Simplify ma

Re: Significance of "name" in AbstractVector

I concur. It also makes it much harder for us to introduce an outside package. Labeling as a layer is just fine. In some sense, this is analogous to the distinction between data.frame and matrix in R (there are other historical diff's as well). The point is that labeling the mathematical object

Re: [DISCUSS] Mahout TLP Board Resolution

Updated for Abdelhakim's name: X. Establish the Apache Mahout Project WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best interests of the Foundation and consistent with the Foundation's purpose to establish a Project Management Committee charged with the creation and maintenance o

Re: [DISCUSS] Mahout TLP Board Resolution

On Mar 18, 2010, at 1:34 PM, deneche abdelhakim wrote: > should be "Abdelhakim Deneche <...>" cause my first name is 'Abdelhakim Sorry, was going by your email "from" tag. Will correct. > > On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 1:07 PM, Grant Ingersoll wrote: >> So here's the update: >> >> X. Establish

Re: [DISCUSS] Mahout TLP Board Resolution

Or perhaps: عبدل حكيم ? On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 1:34 PM, deneche abdelhakim wrote: > should be "Abdelhakim Deneche <...>" cause my first name is 'Abdelhakim > > On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 1:07 PM, Grant Ingersoll wrote: >> So here's the update: >> >> X. Establish the Apache Mahout Project >> >>

Re: [DISCUSS] Mahout TLP Board Resolution

should be "Abdelhakim Deneche <...>" cause my first name is 'Abdelhakim On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 1:07 PM, Grant Ingersoll wrote: > So here's the update: > > X. Establish the Apache Mahout Project > >   WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best >   interests of the Foundation and c

Re: Significance of "name" in AbstractVector

Hi Pallavi, I personally agree that keeping the name as part of the mathematical vector is wrong, because it leads to not only the issues you've brought up, but also means we still have these *4* different ways of saying that two vectors are "the same": ==, equals(), equivalent(), and strictEqui

[jira] Resolved: (MAHOUT-321) Rationalize use of similarity metrics as weights in user-based, item-based recommendation

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-321?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Sean Owen resolved MAHOUT-321. -- Resolution: Fixed Committed > Rationalize use of similarity metrics as weights in user-based, item-bas

Re: commons-lang version conflict

Good change indeed then -- yes core shouldn't depend on this now, right. I'm not seeing errors now, thanks. On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 11:18 AM, Benson Margulies wrote: > I removed the 'dependency' from collections to collections-codegen. It > should never have been there, I was flailing around tryi

Re: [DISCUSS] Mahout TLP Board Resolution

So here's the update: X. Establish the Apache Mahout Project WHEREAS, the Board of Directors deems it to be in the best interests of the Foundation and consistent with the Foundation's purpose to establish a Project Management Committee charged with the creation and maintenance of

Re: commons-lang version conflict

I removed the 'dependency' from collections to collections-codegen. It should never have been there, I was flailing around trying to explain your mysterious problems. Now the codegen is in its own little bubble, and the two versions should not interact. On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 7:13 AM, Sean Owen

Re: commons-lang version conflict

Yes that'd be nice I imagine, to force use of 2.4. Separately, I made changes to use long[1] and double[1] as a simplistic version of MutableLong/MutableDouble. I don't entirely like it but it works fine and doesn't have any library dependency. But, that really only dodges the problem that we hav

[ANN] Apache Mahout 0.3 Released

Apache Mahout 0.3 has been released and is now available for public download at http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/lucene/mahout Up-to-date maven artifacts can be found in the Apache repository at https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/releases/org/a

[jira] Commented: (MAHOUT-153) Implement kmeans++ for initial cluster selection in kmeans

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-153?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12846785#action_12846785 ] Pallavi Palleti commented on MAHOUT-153: Forgot to mention. In this patch, I made t

[ANNOUNCE] Apache Mahout 0.3 Released

> > Apache Mahout 0.3 has been released and is now available for public > download at http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/lucene/mahout > Up-to-date maven artifacts can be found in the Apache repository at > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/re

Re: Can someone please mark 0.3 release in JIRA?

I am sending the announcement in a short while Robin On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 9:23 AM, Robin Anil wrote: > Just woke up. I think no one did the announcement. @Grant. ready to make > one? > > Robin > > > > On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 6:44 AM, Grant Ingersoll wrote: > >> Has the release been sent out?

Re: [DISCUSS] Mahout TLP Board Resolution

I'm in too On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 2:31 AM, Benson Margulies wrote: > Oh, sorry. I'm in. > > On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 9:17 PM, Grant Ingersoll wrote: >> >> On Mar 17, 2010, at 9:43 AM, Grant Ingersoll wrote: >> >>> Formalizing a bit more and updating the resolution based on the "opt-in" >>> emai