On 12/02/2010 1:17 PM, Drew Farris wrote:
Regardless, of these points, I can make the change locally, but I
think that generally slf4j -> slf4j-jcl -> log4j is probably the right
way to go.
Here are my unsolicited 2c.
slf4j-jcl is merely an slf4j adapter for jcl. So, when the SLF4J API is
i
On 12/02/2010 3:09 PM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
On Feb 12, 2010, at 9:01 AM, Ceki Gülcü wrote:
On 12/02/2010 1:17 PM, Drew Farris wrote:
Regardless, of these points, I can make the change locally, but I
think that generally slf4j -> slf4j-jcl -> log4j is probably the right
way
