+1
-Yonik
On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 5:49 AM, Grant Ingersoll gsing...@apache.org wrote:
[Take 2. I fixed the NOTICE file, but did not change the artifact
generation issue for now.]
Please review and vote for releasing Mahout 0.1. This is our first release
and is all new code.
The
Jukka,
I get:
md5 mahout-0.1-project.tar.gz
MD5 (mahout-0.1-project.tar.gz) = f7341a0eb773d9f96ea87914f3c845dc
cat mahout-0.1-project.tar.gz.md5
f7341a0eb773d9f96ea87914f3c845dc
cat mahout-0.1-project.tar.gz.sha1
5c84eb607c07119aceb1f3824e38205474dabc08
openssl sha1
Hi,
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 5:36 PM, Grant Ingersoll gsing...@apache.org wrote:
Am I doing something wrong? Seems like everything is right. This stuff is
all done automatically by Maven. I downloaded those files today from
+1
Jeff
Grant Ingersoll wrote:
[Take 2. I fixed the NOTICE file, but did not change the artifact
generation issue for now.]
Please review and vote for releasing Mahout 0.1. This is our first
release and is all new code.
The artifacts in are located in:
I only briefly scanned through and viewed the package files and ran
tests on a couple of boxes. Looks good though, +1.
28 mar 2009 kl. 10.49 skrev Grant Ingersoll:
[Take 2. I fixed the NOTICE file, but did not change the artifact
generation issue for now.]
Please review and vote for
Here's my +1
On Mar 28, 2009, at 5:49 AM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
[Take 2. I fixed the NOTICE file, but did not change the artifact
generation issue for now.]
Please review and vote for releasing Mahout 0.1. This is our first
release and is all new code.
The artifacts in are located
+1
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 6:50 PM, Grant Ingersoll gsing...@apache.org wrote:
Here's my +1
On Mar 28, 2009, at 5:49 AM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
[Take 2. I fixed the NOTICE file, but did not change the artifact
generation issue for now.]
Please review and vote for releasing Mahout 0.1.
Hi,
On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 11:49 AM, Grant Ingersoll gsing...@apache.org wrote:
Please review and vote for releasing Mahout 0.1.
-1 I'm getting conflicting checksums for the mahout-0.1-project.tar.gz
package that I'm using to review the sources. The checksums of my
download are:
MD5:
On Mar 30, 2009, at 12:53 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 11:49 AM, Grant Ingersoll
gsing...@apache.org wrote:
Please review and vote for releasing Mahout 0.1.
-1 I'm getting conflicting checksums for the mahout-0.1-project.tar.gz
package that I'm using to review the
[Take 2. I fixed the NOTICE file, but did not change the artifact
generation issue for now.]
Please review and vote for releasing Mahout 0.1. This is our first
release and is all new code.
The artifacts in are located in:
On Mar 22, 2009, at 10:31 PM, Jukka Zitting wrote:
Hi,
Based on a quick look all the licensing stuff seems to be pretty much
in order. However, note the following:
* The copyright year in NOTICE.txt should be 2009, not 2007
* The main purpose of the NOTICE.txt file is to list the copyright
Hi,
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 8:51 AM, Grant Ingersoll gsing...@apache.org wrote:
I will fix these and generate a new candidate
OK, good. Let me know if you need a hand with those, I have a lot (too
much :-) of experience digging through license files.
You mean about the size? I figured this
Hi,
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 10:36 PM, Grant Ingersoll gsing...@apache.org wrote:
Please review and vote for releasing Mahout 0.1. This is our first release
and is all new code.
-0 I get the following test failures on mvn install:
Running
that
doesn't contain spaces.
--- En date de : Dim 22.3.09, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com a écrit :
De: Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com
Objet: Re: [VOTE] Mahout 0.1
À: gene...@lucene.apache.org
Cc: mahout-dev@lucene.apache.org
Date: Dimanche 22 Mars 2009, 22h31
Hi,
On Thu, Mar 19
Just realized, I didn't add my +1, although it seems implied since I
produced the candidate.
Anyway, +1
-Grant
On Mar 19, 2009, at 5:36 PM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
Please review and vote for releasing Mahout 0.1. This is our first
release and is all new code.
The artifacts in are
Hi guys. Not much activity from me -- really ashamed of it, but swamped in other
duties. Anyway, downloaded mahout-0.1-project.tar.bz2 and (OpenSuSE 10.3):
tar -jxf *.bz2
gives a warning:
tar: A lone zero block at 14473
Running mvn:install (Maven 2.0.9) hangs for a long time on one of the
On Mar 20, 2009, at 10:02 AM, Dawid Weiss wrote:
Hi guys. Not much activity from me -- really ashamed of it, but
swamped in other duties. Anyway, downloaded mahout-0.1-
project.tar.bz2 and (OpenSuSE 10.3):
tar -jxf *.bz2
gives a warning:
tar: A lone zero block at 14473
I assume you
tar: A lone zero block at 14473
I assume you are on a Mac? I get that too, but it always seems to be fine.
Nope, it's OpenSuSE (Linux), 64-bit. I've seen these warnins with gzip and
bzip-compressed tar files occasionally, but they never meant anything that would
indicate data corruption.
You have to do mvn install from the top first, see:
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/MAHOUT/BuildingMahout
On Mar 19, 2009, at 5:57 PM, Jeff Eastman wrote:
I downloaded the tarball and extracted it, then ran mvn test. It
seems to be missing one artifact. Here's the output:
[INFO]
It's still building / installing for me (anybody have a clue what is
taking so long to package?), but assuming that passes, +1. It is most
certainly 'close enough' for an 0.1 release in my book.
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 10:00 PM, Grant Ingersoll gsing...@apache.org wrote:
You have to do mvn
20 matches
Mail list logo
