Re: [VOTE] Release 0.2

On Monday 16 November 2009 19:44:38 Ted Dunning wrote: > Congrats. Congratulations from me as well! Isabel -- |\ _,,,---,,_ Web: /,`.-'`'-. ;-;;,_ |,4- ) )-,_..;\ ( `'-' '---''(_/--' `-'\_) (fL) IM: signature.asc Description: Thi

Re: [VOTE] Release 0.2

Congrats. This was a rocky one which make the relief of completion all the more sweet. On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 8:38 AM, Grant Ingersoll wrote: > Yep, will do this afternoon, will send the release announcement tomorrow. > > On Nov 16, 2009, at 10:17 AM, Sean Owen wrote: > > > That looks like a q

Re: [VOTE] Release 0.2

Yep, will do this afternoon, will send the release announcement tomorrow. On Nov 16, 2009, at 10:17 AM, Sean Owen wrote: > That looks like a quorum -- 3 days, +4, no objections. I say push it out. > > On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 3:02 PM, Grant Ingersoll wrote: >> +1 from me.

Re: [VOTE] Release 0.2

That looks like a quorum -- 3 days, +4, no objections. I say push it out. On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 3:02 PM, Grant Ingersoll wrote: > +1 from me.

Re: [VOTE] Release 0.2

+1 from me. On Nov 12, 2009, at 4:58 PM, Grant Ingersoll wrote: > Please vote on releasing the artifacts at: > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-002/org/apache/mahout/ > > KEYS file is in the Mahout root trunk. > > Things to do before voting: > > 1. Download a

Re: [VOTE] Release 0.2

On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 8:31 AM, Grant Ingersoll wrote: > > On Nov 15, 2009, at 11:03 PM, Drew Farris wrote: > >> It should be a matter of adding an execution to the top level assembly >> plugin in the release profile to build binary artifacts, but I'm a bit >> rusty with the setting up binary ass

Re: [VOTE] Release 0.2

On Nov 15, 2009, at 11:03 PM, Drew Farris wrote: > It should be a matter of adding an execution to the top level assembly > plugin in the release profile to build binary artifacts, but I'm a bit > rusty with the setting up binary assemblies for multi-module projects. > It is likely that it needs

Re: [VOTE] Release 0.2

Done, I agree this should not be a blocker. +1 again to release. Any other votes? On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 11:07 AM, Jukka Zitting wrote: >  core/pom.xml >  core/src/main/java/overview.html >  core/src/main/java/org/apache/mahout/df/data/DescriptorUtils.java >  core/src/test/java/org/apache/mahout

Re: [VOTE] Release 0.2

Hi, On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 10:58 PM, Grant Ingersoll wrote: > Please vote on releasing the artifacts at: > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-002/org/apache/mahout/ +1 to release > Things to do before voting: > > 1. Download and verify signatures on all the ar

Re: [VOTE] Release 0.2

It should be a matter of adding an execution to the top level assembly plugin in the release profile to build binary artifacts, but I'm a bit rusty with the setting up binary assemblies for multi-module projects. It is likely that it needs a custom assembly descriptor to put everything in its prop

Re: [VOTE] Release 0.2

I don't think it includes binary .jar files. You build them but I agree, would be much more convenient to provide them. Is this easy to do? I don't know. That said I am still +1 on the release as is. It has been 2 months since we started trying to pull this together and think it's well in good eno

Re: [VOTE] Release 0.2

For what it's worth I downloaded all of the artifacts and verified their signatures using gpg -- everything checked out. I'm curious about the binary release. I couldn't seem to find a binary tarball/zip in the repo anywhere. For example, I unrolled mahout-0.2-project.tar.gz and there were no jar

Re: [VOTE] Release 0.2

That's all but identical to me. Not sure what's up. I use the 64-bit JVM by default, maybe that's it? Don't think you even need to reroll. It's not a code issue, at best a test issue, and really not even that. On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 1:20 PM, Grant Ingersoll wrote: > OK, check it and I'll reroll

Re: [VOTE] Release 0.2

OK, check it and I'll reroll today. Here's mine: mvn --version Apache Maven 2.2.1 (r801777; 2009-08-06 15:16:01-0400) Java version: 1.6.0_15 Java home: /System/Library/Frameworks/JavaVM.framework/Versions/1.6.0/Home Default locale: en_US, platform encoding: MacRoman OS name: "mac os x" version: "

Re: [VOTE] Release 0.2

Mac OS X 10.6.2, Java 6, Maven 2.2.1. The usual. It's consistently reproducible. My 'fix' can't really hurt and I committed it. This should already be something the tests do anyway, so that a difference in the 17th decimal place doesn't fail the test (except in some very special case where it is s

Re: [VOTE] Release 0.2

And which mvn? On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 5:07 PM, Grant Ingersoll wrote: > Hmm, I'm on a Mac and running on the command line. What version of OS X > and what JVM? > > On Nov 12, 2009, at 5:49 PM, Sean Owen wrote: > > > I still see that test failure I mentioned, but only happens on the > > command

Re: [VOTE] Release 0.2

Hmm, I'm on a Mac and running on the command line. What version of OS X and what JVM? On Nov 12, 2009, at 5:49 PM, Sean Owen wrote: > I still see that test failure I mentioned, but only happens on the > command line (and perhaps only on a Mac). It is to do with a double > value being compared f

Re: [VOTE] Release 0.2

I still see that test failure I mentioned, but only happens on the command line (and perhaps only on a Mac). It is to do with a double value being compared for exact equality. I "fixed" it but it's hardly a blocker. Otherwise +1 On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 9:58 PM, Grant Ingersoll wrote: > Please vot

[VOTE] Release 0.2

Please vote on releasing the artifacts at: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachemahout-002/org/apache/mahout/ KEYS file is in the Mahout root trunk. Things to do before voting: 1. Download and verify signatures on all the artifacts. 2. Try out the tests, examples, etc. 3.