Re: [jira] Commented: (MAHOUT-238) Further Dependency Cleanup

2010-01-25 Thread Grant Ingersoll
We put it up there. On Jan 23, 2010, at 11:25 AM, Drew Farris wrote: How was the current hbase deployed to the apache repo under the mahout package name? I'd be happy to help get these (and a newer hadoop) rolled in, I'm just unsure of the process. On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 5:07 PM, Ted

Re: [jira] Commented: (MAHOUT-238) Further Dependency Cleanup

2010-01-25 Thread Isabel Drost
On Mon Grant Ingersoll gsing...@apache.org wrote: We put it up there. http://www.lucidimagination.com/search/document/621471200d2182bb/dependencies_outside_maven_central_was_oh_joy#621471200d2182bb is the link to the posting by Jukka explaining exactly how it was done. Isabel

Re: [jira] Commented: (MAHOUT-238) Further Dependency Cleanup

2010-01-25 Thread Drew Farris
Great, I suspected someone within Mahout had deployed them, it is nice to have the reference. Thanks Isabel. It looks like a committer will need to take care of this. I propose we deploy the following artifacts under the mahout repo: A time-stamped snapshot of hadoop 0.20.2, possibly including

Fwd: [jira] Commented: (MAHOUT-238) Further Dependency Cleanup

2010-01-23 Thread Ted Dunning
Michael, Can you follow up on mahout-dev? -- Forwarded message -- From: Drew Farris drew.far...@gmail.com Date: Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 8:25 AM Subject: Re: [jira] Commented: (MAHOUT-238) Further Dependency Cleanup To: mahout-dev@lucene.apache.org How was the current hbase

Re: [jira] Commented: (MAHOUT-238) Further Dependency Cleanup

2010-01-23 Thread Stack
From: Drew Farris drew.far...@gmail.com Date: Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 8:25 AM Subject: Re: [jira] Commented: (MAHOUT-238) Further Dependency Cleanup To: mahout-dev@lucene.apache.org How was the current hbase deployed to the apache repo under the mahout package name? I'd be happy to help get

Re: [jira] Commented: (MAHOUT-238) Further Dependency Cleanup

2010-01-23 Thread Kay Kay
On 01/23/2010 11:44 AM, Stack wrote: From: Drew Farrisdrew.far...@gmail.com Date: Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 8:25 AM Subject: Re: [jira] Commented: (MAHOUT-238) Further Dependency Cleanup To: mahout-dev@lucene.apache.org How was the current hbase deployed to the apache repo under the mahout package

Re: [jira] Commented: (MAHOUT-238) Further Dependency Cleanup

2010-01-22 Thread Drew Farris
Neither hbase 0.20.2 nor zookeeper (any version) appear to be in a maven repo at this point, so Mahout would have to roll and deploy these. What was the process that was followed to build and deploy the mahout-packaged hadoop 0.20.1 and hbase artifacts? Is this something I could submit a patch to

Re: [jira] Commented: (MAHOUT-238) Further Dependency Cleanup

2010-01-22 Thread Ted Dunning
Feedback from ZK and hbase folks: Mahadev Konar said: Unfortunately no.. We are planning to deploy 3.3 as the first version on maven repo. StAck said: We're working on hbase 0.21 as being the first hbase that shows up in a maven repo. It looks like we are on our own. On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at

Re: [jira] Commented: (MAHOUT-238) Further Dependency Cleanup

2010-01-21 Thread zhao zhendong
Hi Drew, I propose to 1) update hbase-0.20.0.jar to hbase-0.20.2.jar due to the later is stable and hbased-platform is based on this version, 2) and add zookeeper-3.2.1.jar. Cheers, Zhendong On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 12:36 PM, zhao zhendong zhaozhend...@gmail.comwrote: Hi Drew, Including a

Re: [jira] Commented: (MAHOUT-238) Further Dependency Cleanup

2010-01-21 Thread Ted Dunning
I think that 3.2.2 is the current release for ZK On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 2:12 AM, zhao zhendong zhaozhend...@gmail.comwrote: 2) and add zookeeper-3.2.1.jar. -- Ted Dunning, CTO DeepDyve

Re: [jira] Commented: (MAHOUT-238) Further Dependency Cleanup

2010-01-18 Thread zhao zhendong
Hi Drew, Including a source code in snapshots that will be great. Currently, the HDFS reader does not work in 0.20.2. Without source code, it's not convenient for me to debug the code. Cheers, Zhendong On Sat, Jan 9, 2010 at 12:25 AM, Drew Farris drew.far...@gmail.com wrote: I wonder if we

Re: [jira] Commented: (MAHOUT-238) Further Dependency Cleanup

2010-01-08 Thread Drew Farris
First, apologies for propagating a problem here. Since 0.20.2 is a snapshot, there's no release of hadoop that corresponds directly to it. In maven terms, a snapshot could be anything after 0.20.1 but prior to a formal release of 0.20.2. In the repo, they are timestamped. We're pulling this jar

Re: [jira] Commented: (MAHOUT-238) Further Dependency Cleanup

2010-01-08 Thread zhao zhendong
Thanks Drew, +1 for me to maintain a stable hadoop release, such as 0.20.1. The reason is obvious :) Cheers, Zhendong On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 10:23 PM, Drew Farris drew.far...@gmail.com wrote: First, apologies for propagating a problem here. Since 0.20.2 is a snapshot, there's no release of

[jira] Commented: (MAHOUT-238) Further Dependency Cleanup

2010-01-07 Thread Sean Owen (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-238?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12797628#action_12797628 ] Sean Owen commented on MAHOUT-238: -- A complete delete and reinstall fixed everything. Yes

[jira] Commented: (MAHOUT-238) Further Dependency Cleanup

2010-01-07 Thread Drew Farris (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-238?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12797719#action_12797719 ] Drew Farris commented on MAHOUT-238: Thanks Sean. Further Dependency Cleanup

[jira] Commented: (MAHOUT-238) Further Dependency Cleanup

2010-01-06 Thread Sean Owen (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MAHOUT-238?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12797547#action_12797547 ] Sean Owen commented on MAHOUT-238: -- For some reason I can't apply the patch but again