Re: Hadoop upgrade

2009-03-18 Thread Grant Ingersoll
D'oh! Thanks! On Mar 18, 2009, at 4:32 AM, Sean Owen wrote: (I upgraded to 0.19.1 last week.) On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 10:41 PM, Grant Ingersoll gsing...@apache.org wrote: OK, pending MAHOUT-110, I think we are good to go on the release. Not sure who volunteered to upgrade Hadoop, so go

Re: Hadoop upgrade

2009-03-17 Thread Grant Ingersoll
OK, pending MAHOUT-110, I think we are good to go on the release. Not sure who volunteered to upgrade Hadoop, so go for it now, or it will wait until after 0.1. -Grant On Mar 12, 2009, at 12:25 PM, Otis Gospodnetic wrote: While poking around poms I noticed we are still depending on

Re: Hadoop upgrade

2009-03-12 Thread Sean Owen
Upgrade sounds good, I can do that. What is the packaging issue? is it anything that can be worked around by simplifying or dropping part of the build temporarily. 'Good enough' is good enough for 0.1. On Mar 12, 2009 5:04 PM, Grant Ingersoll gsing...@apache.org wrote: +1. I think the only

Re: Hadoop upgrade

2009-03-12 Thread Grant Ingersoll
On Mar 12, 2009, at 2:28 PM, Sean Owen wrote: Upgrade sounds good, I can do that. What is the packaging issue? is it anything that can be worked around by simplifying or dropping part of the build temporarily. 'Good enough' is good enough for 0.1. Yeah, I was just thinking I would drop

Re: Hadoop upgrade

2009-03-12 Thread Grant Ingersoll
On Mar 12, 2009, at 3:14 PM, Grant Ingersoll wrote: On Mar 12, 2009, at 2:28 PM, Sean Owen wrote: Upgrade sounds good, I can do that. What is the packaging issue? is it anything that can be worked around by simplifying or dropping part of the build temporarily. 'Good enough' is good