So far, I think it's a great idea to resize the proposal to porting
LIBLINEAR to Mahout with compatible interface with Pegasos implementation.
I will mail the author of JAVA-LIBLINEAR and discuss about the licenses
stuff.
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 4:54 AM, Ted Dunning wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 21, 20
On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 1:49 AM, zhao zhendong wrote:
> ...
> That's true. Do you think whether porting a LIBLINEAR to Mahout is good
> enough for this proposal, I really don't know How big is big enough:) If
> Yes, I can move the rest part for the future work.
>
Porting liblinear would probably
Hi,
See the response below:
On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 3:53 AM, Ted Dunning wrote:
> This seems like a good idea for a project, but I see two issues:
>
> a) it seems very ambitious for one summer. This is good and bad. Good
> because you are excited and want to accomplish something grand, bad if
This seems like a good idea for a project, but I see two issues:
a) it seems very ambitious for one summer. This is good and bad. Good
because you are excited and want to accomplish something grand, bad if it is
too ambitious and would cause you to officially fail while still
accomplishing parts
Hi all,
Robin told me such great chance for continuous contributing code here (many
thanks to Robin). Because I still work on Sequential SVM (Mahout-232) and I
prefer to extend it to a unified framework that incorporates some other
state-of-the-art linear SVM classifiers, I propose "Linear Support
