Hi Zhao,
The best way to share this is to generate a patch and attach it to an issue in
JIRA. See the How To Contribute section on the wiki. I think many of us are
interested, so it would be easier to have the discussion on the mailing list or
JIRA instead of trying to manage it privately.
-
Hi all,
I have finished a draft of proposal on Parallel Pegasos SVM solover.
I need some comments. If any one interested in this proposal, contact me
please.
By the way, is it a good idea to attach this proposal in this mail session.
Cheers,
Zhendong
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 1:16 AM, Ted Dunnin
I have half of an SGD logistic regression written. There might be some code
to share. I will put up a patch shortly so that others can follow progress.
There is also a group of four (very quiet) developers who are working on
something related to SVM. I will be meeting with them tomorrow morning
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 5:02 AM, Jake Mannix wrote:
> I really feel like I should respond to this, but seeing as I live on the
> west coast
> of the US, going to bed might be more advisable.
>
> On a very specific topic of SVMs, I can certainly look into this, but David,
> were you interested in h
On Dec 11, 2009, at 7:40 AM, Sean Owen wrote:
> This is a timely message, since I'm currently presuming to close some
> old Mahout issues at the moment and it raises a related concern.
>
> There's lots of old JIRA issues of the form:
> 1) somebody submits a patch implementing part of something
>
On Fri Sean Owen wrote:
> Sure is there a mailing list or something for this? I'd like to be
> looped into talking about issues like this.
d...@community.apache.org
Isabel
Sure is there a mailing list or something for this? I'd like to be
looped into talking about issues like this.
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 3:59 PM, Isabel Drost wrote:
> Attracting new committers and integrating contributors is a topic that
> is not only relevant for Mahout but for many, if not all A
On Fri Sean Owen wrote:
> On Fri Isabel Drost wrote:
> > If you are interested in a broader discussion, it might make sense
> > to include the people over at the newly founded community
> > development project in the discussion?
>
> What's this?
Attracting new committers and integrating contribu
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 2:08 PM, Isabel Drost wrote:
> I would guess that your question is not really restricted to Mahout but
> the same question appears on other projects as well. Basically the
> question is on "how to mentor developers to become new project members".
The first question is how
On Fri Sean Owen wrote:
> 1) Is SVM in scope for Mahout? (I am guessing so.)
Yes.
> 2) Who is nominally committing to shepherd the code into the code base
> and fix bugs and answer questions? (Jake?)
>
> I'm not really bothered about this particular patch, but the more
> general question.
I
I really feel like I should respond to this, but seeing as I live on the
west coast
of the US, going to bed might be more advisable.
On a very specific topic of SVMs, I can certainly look into this, but David,
were you interested in helping bring this into Mahout and help maintain it?
You are ofte
This is a timely message, since I'm currently presuming to close some
old Mahout issues at the moment and it raises a related concern.
There's lots of old JIRA issues of the form:
1) somebody submits a patch implementing part of something
2) some comments happen, maybe
3) nothing happens for a yea
Hi Zhao,
I would certainly love to see a nice parallel SVM on hadoop. Submit a
patch, let's
get it in Mahout!
-jake
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 3:52 AM, zhao zhendong wrote:
> True, I am still wondering about whether it is valuable to implement a
> parallel SVM on hadoop? I really wanna join i
True, I am still wondering about whether it is valuable to implement a
parallel SVM on hadoop? I really wanna join in mike's group.
Just like Olivier concerned, some linear version of SVM solvers can handle
large-scale data sets ( several seconds for 100K-level samples). It's true
that the linear
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 2:12 AM, Olivier Grisel wrote:
> 2009/12/3 Ted Dunning :
>> Very interesting results, particularly the lack of dependence on data size.
>>
>> On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 12:02 AM, David Hall wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 2:35 AM, Isabel Drost wrote:
>>> > On Fri Grant I
2009/12/3 Ted Dunning :
> Very interesting results, particularly the lack of dependence on data size.
>
> On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 12:02 AM, David Hall wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 2:35 AM, Isabel Drost wrote:
>> > On Fri Grant Ingersoll wrote:
>> >> On Nov 19, 2009, at 1:15 PM, Sean Owen w
Very interesting results, particularly the lack of dependence on data size.
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 12:02 AM, David Hall wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 2:35 AM, Isabel Drost wrote:
> > On Fri Grant Ingersoll wrote:
> >> On Nov 19, 2009, at 1:15 PM, Sean Owen wrote:
> >> > Post a patch if you'
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 2:35 AM, Isabel Drost wrote:
> On Fri Grant Ingersoll wrote:
>> On Nov 19, 2009, at 1:15 PM, Sean Owen wrote:
>> > Post a patch if you'd like to proceed, IMHO.
>> +1
>
> +1 from me as well. I would love to see solid svm support in Mahout.
And another +1 from me. If you wa
On Fri Grant Ingersoll wrote:
> On Nov 19, 2009, at 1:15 PM, Sean Owen wrote:
> > Post a patch if you'd like to proceed, IMHO.
> +1
+1 from me as well. I would love to see solid svm support in Mahout.
Isabel
+1
On Nov 19, 2009, at 1:15 PM, Sean Owen wrote:
> I agree that we should have some serious SVM support. I also just
> closed out a very old issue on this topic!
>
> I am all for it if you can submit some code, that you are basically
> willing to support. A Hadoop-based implementation is ideal,
I agree that we should have some serious SVM support. I also just
closed out a very old issue on this topic!
I am all for it if you can submit some code, that you are basically
willing to support. A Hadoop-based implementation is ideal, but
anything consistent is good in my book.
Post a patch if
Mike,
Good to hear from you.
A solid Java implementation of SVM would be of interest. A highly scalable
implementation would be even more interesting.
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 9:15 AM, mike bowles wrote:
> I’m a newbie here and am a little timid about raising my hand, but I do
> want to be he
I'm a newbie here and am a little timid about raising my hand, but I do want
to be helpful, so here goes. If I'm making some mistake in etiquette,
please let me know (but be gentle).
The most commonly used algorithm for SVM is based on work done be John Platt
at Microsoft Reasearch (used for
23 matches
Mail list logo
