Re: [Mailman-Developers] List of list admins

2001-03-21 Thread Barry A. Warsaw
Juan Carlos, I like this! I'm going to add it to the Mailman 2.1 tree (with a few modifications). Thanks! -Barry ___ Mailman-Developers mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/mailman-developers

[Mailman-Developers] Easily customisable webmin templating

2001-03-21 Thread Larry Reckner
Hello: I've seen this touced upon while searching through the various mailing lists for mailman, however I don't know if I've seen a solution (if so, plesae point me in the right direction and I'll be more than happy to run with that). Anyway, my situation is that I sysadmin for a web hosting com

Re: [Mailman-Developers] Wildly OT - qmail and mangling (was: mailman and the web)

2001-03-21 Thread J C Lawrence
On Tue, 20 Mar 2001 00:38:35 -0500 Jay R Ashworth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Mar 19, 2001 at 08:36:26PM -0800, J C Lawrence wrote: >> > Typical djb mistake. >> >> While he reinvented common practice (a definite DJB-ism) he >> hardly violated any standard -- +-addressing is still mostl

Re: [Mailman-Developers] Mailman + DB: Snag

2001-03-21 Thread Chris Ryan
I have uploaded the patch on to Sourceforge.net as requested and in context format. Thanks for the heads up and info on these. Chris Ryan [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thomas Wouters wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 20, 2001 at 10:40:12PM +0100, Ricardo Kustner wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 20, 2001 at 11:32:01AM -

Re: [Mailman-Developers] Mailman + DB: Snag

2001-03-21 Thread Thomas Wouters
On Tue, Mar 20, 2001 at 10:40:12PM +0100, Ricardo Kustner wrote: > On Tue, Mar 20, 2001 at 11:32:01AM -0500, Chris Ryan wrote: > > I worked through the problem (as described below) that I was > > encountering for the datasource driver stuff. I've attached a patch for > > your approval to be ap