Re: [Mailman-Developers] Re: 2006 archives already online!

2001-04-30 Thread Barry A. Warsaw
> "JRA" == Jay R Ashworth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: JRA> Use the farts, Luke. JRA> or, alternatively: JRA> Luke... *I* am your farter. Ah, that's the spirit! Mailman's new motto: The Better Smelling List Server -Barry ___ Mailma

Re: [Mailman-Developers] Re: 2006 archives already online!

2001-04-30 Thread Jay R. Ashworth
On Tue, May 01, 2001 at 01:00:14AM -0400, Barry A. Warsaw wrote: > Ah some new entries for my X-Oblique-Strategy file: > Trust the Butt > The Butt Knows Best > When in Doubt, ButtThink Use the farts, Luke. or, alternatively: Luke... *I* am your farter. Cheers, -- jra -- Jay R. Ash

Re: [Mailman-Developers] Re: 2006 archives already online!

2001-04-30 Thread Barry A. Warsaw
> "JRA" == Jay R Ashworth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: JRA> Well, the implication was that your brain wasn't involved in JRA> the thing. Ah some new entries for my X-Oblique-Strategy file: Trust the Butt The Butt Knows Best When in Doubt, ButtThink ? :) -Barry

Re: [Mailman-Developers] Re: 2006 archives already online!

2001-04-30 Thread Barry A. Warsaw
> "OT" == Owen Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: OT> What I did for the gnome.org archives (using mhonarc plus OT> custom perl) is to used the Received: header for the date. Ah, but which one? :) There's going to have a Received: header for each hop that message takes. By the tim

Re: [Mailman-Developers] Re: 2006 archives already online!

2001-04-30 Thread Jay R. Ashworth
On Tue, May 01, 2001 at 12:27:16AM -0400, Barry A. Warsaw wrote: > > "JRA" == Jay R Ashworth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > JRA> That sounds good to me, although, as someone noted, perhaps > JRA> 90 days is a bit long. Did you pull that number out of your > JRA> butt, or was there

Re: [Mailman-Developers] Re: 2006 archives already online!

2001-04-30 Thread Owen Taylor
Marc MERLIN <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Mon, Apr 30, 2001 at 09:28:51PM +0200, Fil wrote: > > @ Darrell Fuhriman ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) : > > > That's why under "archival options" you'll find: > > > > > > "Set date in archive to when the mail is claimed to have been > > > sent, or to the ti

Re: [Mailman-Developers] Re: 2006 archives already online!

2001-04-30 Thread Barry A. Warsaw
> "JRA" == Jay R Ashworth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: JRA> That sounds good to me, although, as someone noted, perhaps JRA> 90 days is a bit long. Did you pull that number out of your JRA> butt, or was there a specific motivation for it? See my other message. Although I'd like

Re: [Mailman-Developers] Re: 2006 archives already online!

2001-04-30 Thread Barry A. Warsaw
> "OW" == Ousmane Wilane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: OW> So far so good as usual! Thanks! BAW> ARCHIVER_CLOBBER_DATE_POLICY = 2 BAW> ARCHIVER_ALLOWABLE_SANE_DATE_SKEW = days(90) OW> IMHO 90 It's too long as default! Why? I figure most of the outrageous headers are somethi

Re: [Mailman-Developers] Re: 2006 archives already online!

2001-04-30 Thread Jay R. Ashworth
On Mon, Apr 30, 2001 at 11:46:16PM -0400, Barry A. Warsaw wrote: > > "BAW" == Barry A Warsaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > BAW> So my proposal is to > BAW> - get rid of clobber_date as a list-specific variable > BAW> - add a site variable ARCHIVER_CLOBBER_DATE_POLICY which > BA

Re: [Mailman-Developers] Delivering messages to scripts/post

2001-04-30 Thread Barry A. Warsaw
> "JJ" == Jesper Jensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: JJ> We have been running Mailman on Windows for about two weeks JJ> now and most things seem to work very well. Very cool! JJ> To make it run I had to make some changes - all of them minor JJ> - and most of them relate

Re: [Mailman-Developers] Re: 2006 archives already online!

2001-04-30 Thread Jay R. Ashworth
On Mon, Apr 30, 2001 at 03:41:46PM -0700, Marc MERLIN wrote: > > "When sent" is the default. How do you change the default to "When Resent"? > > Shouldn't it be changed in the mailman's Defaults.py ? > > I very firmly believe this, and so do all the people who have archives > showing messages wit

Re: [Mailman-Developers] Re: 2006 archives already online!

2001-04-30 Thread Ousmane Wilane
On Mon, 30 Apr 2001, Barry A. Warsaw wrote: So far so good as usual! BAW>ARCHIVER_CLOBBER_DATE_POLICY = 2 BAW>ARCHIVER_ALLOWABLE_SANE_DATE_SKEW = days(90) IMHO 90 It's too long as default! Why? O. W. Kind regards. ___ Mailman-Developers mailing l

Re: [Mailman-Developers] Re: 2006 archives already online!

2001-04-30 Thread Barry A. Warsaw
> "BAW" == Barry A Warsaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: BAW> So my proposal is to BAW> - get rid of clobber_date as a list-specific variable BAW> - add a site variable ARCHIVER_CLOBBER_DATE_POLICY which BAW> - add a site variable ARCHIVER_ALLOWABLE_SANE_DATE_SKEW which Oh y

Re: [Mailman-Developers] Re: 2006 archives already online!

2001-04-30 Thread Barry A. Warsaw
> "F" == Fil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: F> "When sent" is the default. How do you change the default to F> "When Resent"? Shouldn't it be changed in the mailman's F> Defaults.py ? > "MM" == Marc MERLIN <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: MM> I very firmly believe this, and s

Re: [Mailman-Developers] Delivering messages to scripts/post

2001-04-30 Thread J C Lawrence
On Tue, 01 May 2001 00:54:39 +0200 Jesper Jensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I fully understand and respect that this is a Linux project... Actually its a GNU project, which is not at all Linux specific. Mailman in its current incarnation is Unix-centric in a number of ways (which subtley diff

[Mailman-Developers] Delivering messages to scripts/post

2001-04-30 Thread Jesper Jensen
We have been running Mailman on Windows for about two weeks now and most things seem to work very well. To make it run I had to make some changes - all of them minor - and most of them related to opening files ('b'). Mailmanwin (as I have named it) is probably not useful for anyone but me (and

Re: [Mailman-Developers] Re: 2006 archives already online!

2001-04-30 Thread Marc MERLIN
On Mon, Apr 30, 2001 at 09:28:51PM +0200, Fil wrote: > @ Darrell Fuhriman ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) : > > That's why under "archival options" you'll find: > > > > "Set date in archive to when the mail is claimed to have been > > sent, or to the time we resend it?" > > > > If you leave it on 'when se

Re: [Mailman-Developers] Re: 2006 archives already online!

2001-04-30 Thread Fil
@ Darrell Fuhriman ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) : > That's why under "archival options" you'll find: > > "Set date in archive to when the mail is claimed to have been > sent, or to the time we resend it?" > > If you leave it on 'when sent', you deserve the mess you'll get > in your archives. "When sen

Re: [Mailman-Developers] Re: 2006 archives already online!

2001-04-30 Thread Darrell Fuhriman
Bill Bumgarner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > This appears to be a fairly common problem; I suspect that > MailMan is using a header to set the date and some folks have > their client set to preposterous dates. See: That's why under "archival options" you'll find: "Set date in archive to whe

[Mailman-Developers] Re: 2006 archives already online!

2001-04-30 Thread Bill Bumgarner
This appears to be a fairly common problem; I suspect that MailMan is using a header to set the date and some folks have their client set to preposterous dates. See: http://www.omnigroup.com/mailman/archive/webobjects-dev/ The above is from a mailing list managed with 2.0b3. b.bum On Mo

[Mailman-Developers] small fix for admindb.py

2001-04-30 Thread Tollef Fog Heen
It seems like admindb.py doesn't escape the body of html emails properly, which can make it impossible to do anything to the post. This patch should fix it. --- mailman/Mailman/Cgi/admindb.py~ Mon Apr 30 17:53:15 2001 +++ mailman/Mailman/Cgi/admindb.py Mon Apr 30 17:56:09 2001 @@ -228,