On 6 May 2001, at 21:44, Barry A. Warsaw wrote:
> > "BAW" == Barry A Warsaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> BAW> I've uploaded the Mailman 2.0.5 patch and tarball to
> BAW> SourceForge. Please check out
>
> The 2.0.5 tarball had a bug in the admindb.py. Thanks to Phil Barnett
> wh
> "MM" == Marc MERLIN <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
MM> Just for info: No stale locks showed up over the weekend with
MM> 2.0.5, and messages are still happily flowing.
MM> 2.0.5 looks good.
Yay!
MM> Thanks Barry
MM> Marc
You're very welcome, thanks for the feedback. A
> "BAW" == Barry A Warsaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
BAW> I've uploaded the Mailman 2.0.5 patch and tarball to
BAW> SourceForge. Please check out
The 2.0.5 tarball had a bug in the admindb.py. Thanks to Phil Barnett
who helped discover this. The patch file did not have the bug.
On Fri, May 04, 2001 at 12:14:00PM -0700, Marc MERLIN wrote:
> I'll try to remember to check it again on sunday night and report back.
Just for info:
No stale locks showed up over the weekend with 2.0.5, and messages are still
happily flowing.
2.0.5 looks good.
Thanks Barry
Marc
--
Microsoft i
