[Mailman-Developers] pc°ü·ÃÁ¤º¸ÀÔ´Ï´Ù

ÃÖ½ÅÇüPC CPU¡¦¡¦¡¦.933 (ÀÎÅÚ) RAM¡¦¡¦¡¦128 (»ï¼ºÁ¤Ç°133) HDD¡¦¡¦¡¦30 G MONITER.17"(»ï¼º77E) ¸ðµÎ43¸¸¿ø °ü½ÉÀÖÀ¸¼¼¿ä http://comzon.atozpia.com/news/news.html À̸®·Î ¿À¼¼¿ä ___ Mailman-Developers mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.python.org

[Mailman-Developers] hotmail & MIME-digests

I don't know if this has been discussed before, but am I correct to assume that hotmail.com (and maybe other webmail services too?) doesn't correctly handle MIME digests send by Mailman? I always thought some people just didn't "see" the attached messages, but now I test it myself in hotmail i n

Re: [Mailman-Developers] 2.0.5 and python 2.1?

> "RJ" == Ron Jarrell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: RJ> My old machine was running 1.5.2, and I thought I'd turned RJ> everything on, but given the module config file has about RJ> 174,000 poorly documented bits to flip on or off, apparently I RJ> didn't. I just went back to t

Re: [Mailman-Developers] 2.0.5 and python 2.1?

At 10:38 AM 6/26/01 -0400, Barry A. Warsaw wrote: > > "RJ" == Ron Jarrell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > RJ> Python Information -] admin(25762): sys.version = 2.1 (#1, > >Oops, should have looked closer at your output. I bet something's >messed up with your crypt library. Like, you

Re: [Mailman-Developers] 2.0.5 and python 2.1?

At 10:36 AM 6/26/01 -0400, Barry A. Warsaw wrote: >> "RJ" == Ron Jarrell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >RJ> I thought 2.0.5 was safe under python 2.1? I just copied my >RJ> mailman installation over to a new machine, which had 2.1 >RJ> installed on it. Most stuff works, although

Re: [Mailman-Developers] 2.0.5 and python 2.1?

> "RJ" == Ron Jarrell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: RJ> Python Information -] admin(25762): sys.version = 2.1 (#1, Oops, should have looked closer at your output. I bet something's messed up with your crypt library. Like, your older Python installation didn't have crypt, but your ne

Re: [Mailman-Developers] 2.0.5 and python 2.1?

> "RJ" == Ron Jarrell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: RJ> I thought 2.0.5 was safe under python 2.1? I just copied my RJ> mailman installation over to a new machine, which had 2.1 RJ> installed on it. Most stuff works, although cron is giving me RJ> a slew of warnings about dep

[Mailman-Developers] 2.0.5 and python 2.1?

I thought 2.0.5 was safe under python 2.1? I just copied my mailman installation over to a new machine, which had 2.1 installed on it. Most stuff works, although cron is giving me a slew of warnings about deprecated things and syntax warnings. But admin passwords are failing entirely.. I'm