[Mailman-Developers] Re: Reply-To: handling

2001-10-20 Thread J C Lawrence
On Sat, 20 Oct 2001 17:59:37 -0500 David Champion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Mutt 1.3.23, the current development version (and 1.4 beta) > creates replies only to the *first* address in a multi-reply-to > message. It does permit sending such messages, though, so > internally it minimally suppo

[Mailman-Developers] Feature request

2001-10-20 Thread Steve
Hello all, Great job you guys!! Ever since I test use it, I love it, and been using it ever since. I was just wondering if you guru can add one more action button to the menu of "Posting Held for Approval"? This selection button is called "Ban/Spammers" The reason of doing is because I've bee

[Mailman-Developers] Re: Reply-To: handling

2001-10-20 Thread Jay R. Ashworth
On Sat, Oct 20, 2001 at 05:59:37PM -0500, David Champion wrote: > Jay's using a truly old version of mutt, so I'm going to jump in here. Thanks, David. > Mutt 1.3.23, the current development version (and 1.4 beta) creates > replies only to the *first* address in a multi-reply-to message. It > do

Re: [Mailman-Developers] Reply-To: handling

2001-10-20 Thread Jay R. Ashworth
On Sat, Oct 20, 2001 at 01:47:54PM -0700, John W Baxter wrote: > At 0:56 -0400 10/20/2001, Jay R. Ashworth wrote: > >If multiple headers are not supported, then I submit that we should > >assume that a multi address Reply-to may well be a bug in the spec; > >other address headers may appear multip

[Mailman-Developers] Re: Reply-To: handling

2001-10-20 Thread David Champion
On 2001.10.20, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "J C Lawrence" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > BTW: Have you checked Mutt's behaviour yet? Could/would someone > check Outlook's behaviour? Jay's using a truly old version of mutt, so I'm going to jump in here. Mutt 1.3.23, the current development

Re: [Mailman-Developers] Reply-To: handling

2001-10-20 Thread John W Baxter
At 22:15 -0700 10/19/2001, J C Lawrence wrote: >BTW: Have you checked Mutt's behaviour yet? Could/would someone >check Outlook's behaviour? Eudora 5.1 beta for Mac OS X (wherein I am at the moment) honors multiple address Reply-To: headers. It's highly likely that Eudora has done so from the be

Re: [Mailman-Developers] Reply-To: handling

2001-10-20 Thread John W Baxter
At 0:56 -0400 10/20/2001, Jay R. Ashworth wrote: >If multiple headers are not supported, then I submit that we should >assume that a multi address Reply-to may well be a bug in the spec; >other address headers may appear multiple times, may they not? No more a bug than the legal multi-address Fro

Re: [Mailman-Developers] Bug in mail->news gateway in 2.0.5 (and *simple* fix)

2001-10-20 Thread Barry A. Warsaw
> "BAW" == Barry A Warsaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: BAW> Many months ago... > "jae" == Jürgen A Erhard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: jae> Bug: in Mailman/Handlers/ToUsenet.py, there are spaces jae> inserted after colons where they are missing ("NNTP is strict jae> about

Re: [Mailman-Developers] Bug in mail->news gateway in 2.0.5 (and *simple* fix)

2001-10-20 Thread Barry A. Warsaw
Many months ago... > "jae" == Jürgen A Erhard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: jae> Bug: in Mailman/Handlers/ToUsenet.py, there are spaces jae> inserted after colons where they are missing ("NNTP is strict jae> about spaces after the colon in headers"). jae> If a colon appears i

Re: [Mailman-Developers] Reply-To: handling

2001-10-20 Thread Barry A. Warsaw
> "JCL" == J C Lawrence <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: JCL> I suspect the bullet lists I've been posting recently JCL> could/would do it if touched up a bit. Sure, I'll do it. Great! They should be augmented with the exact variable names and settings to accomplish the goal. Most lik

[Mailman-Developers] unsuscribe webmaster@pymagen.com

2001-10-20 Thread andres gomez
please don´t send more messages. Thanks ___ GO.com Mail Get Your Free, Private E-mail at http://mail.go.com ___ Mailman-Developers mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] htt